unit401
Member
+4|6831
Im 20 years old,ive been playing BF2 for about a year.before that I played every game you can think of for every console and continually beat whatever game i was playing most,in a day or less there were a couple long ones but still beatable...not as fun.Then I found the BATTLEFIELD series and it was the greatest thing i have found in gaming.SO what I am saying is before you bitch about all the patches,glitches,late releases,etc. look at the crappy games that you used to play.so to all you people that say fuck EA,i say fuck you.And YOU should thank EA for what they gave us
san4
The Mas
+311|6960|NYC, a place to live
Personally, I complain because I think BF2 is a great game. I am amazed at how such a great game could have so many horrible bugs in it. The bugs don't ruin the game for me, they are just surprising. Like a surgeon who successfully completes an incredibly complex brain transplant and then leaves a sponge inside the patient.
.cat.
Member
+4|6612
EA didnt give us anything. We paid $$ for a game that theoretically is beta. Of course there will never be a perfect game and there are bugs in all games. BTW - Vietnam was, is the worst of the BF series followed by 2142. There was soemthing real special about 1942. You could tell the skilled players when you faced them unlike BF2 where a unlock can make you appear decent or an unNerfed J10 whoring around could make one assume you're a good pilot heh.

EA makes good games bottom line. Are they perfect? Far from so anyone that forks out $$ can bitch all they want because they are entitled to it :]
Fenris_GreyClaw
Real Хорошо
+826|6791|Adelaide, South Australia

.cat. wrote:

EA didnt give us anything. We paid $$ for a game that theoretically is beta. Of course there will never be a perfect game and there are bugs in all games.
True.

.cat. wrote:

BTW - Vietnam was, is the worst of the BF series followed by 2142.
False. BF:V didnt suck, I liked more than 1942.

.cat. wrote:

There was soemthing real special about 1942. You could tell the skilled players when you faced them unlike BF2 where a unlock can make you appear decent or an unNerfed J10 whoring around could make one assume you're a good pilot heh.
Unlocks make little to no difference and many people still get shot down in the J-10. Your logic is flawed.

.cat. wrote:

EA makes good games bottom line. Are they perfect? Far from so anyone that forks out $$ can bitch all they want because they are entitled to it
Everyone is entitled to an opinion whether they pay for the game of not.
AWSMFOX
Banned
+405|6735|A W S M F O X
Exactly, i agree with brain surgeon theory, makes sense. Brain style, the best way.
MagikTrik
yes.....but your still gay
+138|6643|Pittsburgh, PA USA
I apoligize to you unit401 for you obviously must be better than I....
aLi3nZ
Member
+138|6779|New Zealand
I don't complain much and all I will say is: Good Game, Bad Patches.
Andoura
Got loooollllll ?
+853|6911|Montreal, Qc, Canada
im sure theirs like 200 other post like that
Kamikaze17
Over the line!
+70|7021|Mark it zero.
i think the game was much better when it first came out than what it is now... i just hate how they changed so much gameplay. but unlike most people, i adapted, and didnt just sit there and complain.
im_in_heaven
Member
+27|6860
i dont mind allll the glitches i just hate when i have connection problems. Games are bound to have gltiches. But when it disconnects me or crashes me to desktop. I wouldnt buy a game if i knew it was going to do that.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard