Not sure I understand. Would you compare them to the black civil rights movement, the Native Americans, or something else?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4270669.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4270669.stm
Compares to Native Americansusmarine2007 wrote:
Not sure I understand. Would you compare them to the black civil rights movement, the Native Americans, or something else?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4270669.stm
They didn't understand the concept of ownership. They didn't understand the concept of clothing, agriculture, written language or non-nomadic living (ie. housing), either.joker3327 wrote:
The original owners of Australia!!!
Last edited by Cheez (2007-01-12 17:56:25)
Well just because they didn't embrace European ideals doesn't mean they were backwards, they just had a different way of doing things. And we didn't help them get out of any shit, we (not my forefathers, the fucking English that came over) stole their land, massacred their people, destroyed their heritage and culture. If you think we "tried to help them" you are fucking deluded, either that or you read too much Andrew Bolt.Cheez wrote:
They didn't understand the concept of ownership. They didn't understand the concept of clothing, agriculture, written language or non-nomadic living (ie. housing), either.joker3327 wrote:
The original owners of Australia!!!
Compared to the Native Americans, they we're backwards. And we tried to help out but got into shit for it 100 years later.
Last edited by TeamZephyr (2007-01-12 18:21:12)
Exactly. They were living in a subsistence economy for over 15,000 years. And all of a sudden White Blokes rock up and starts taking their posessions, land and food. They definately would've been like "Zomg wtf 1337 hax?"TeamZephyr wrote:
Well just because they didn't embrace European ideals doesn't mean they were backwards, they just had a different way of doing things.
If they got the land they wanted, what would they do with it?ozzie_johnson wrote:
today most aborigines are on the doll or still bitching about there land which they will do nothing with.
Ah yes, thank for for your accurate commentary Mr Howard.ozzie_johnson wrote:
today most aborigines are on the doll or still bitching about there land which they will do nothing with.
Absolutely nothing.usmarine2007 wrote:
If they got the land they wanted, what would they do with it?ozzie_johnson wrote:
today most aborigines are on the doll or still bitching about there land which they will do nothing with.
Last edited by BF2Craglyeye (2007-01-12 19:46:36)
It is just a way of life for them.joker3327 wrote:
The original owners of Australia!!!
whoa. calm down there. they understood the concept of ownership, but their belief system is centred around respect for the land. they were also nomadic because they understood the cycle of the land, and moved when in need of food or water based on the change in season.Cheez wrote:
They didn't understand the concept of ownership. They didn't understand the concept of clothing, agriculture, written language or non-nomadic living (ie. housing), either.joker3327 wrote:
The original owners of Australia!!!
Compared to the Native Americans, they we're backwards. And we tried to help out but got into shit for it 100 years later.
Last edited by Flecco (2007-01-13 04:27:25)
I think you'll find that by the time Europeans arrived they were living in a fairly sustainable manner.Flecco wrote:
Aboriginals did not use sustainable techniques for hunting, despite popular belief. Most of Australia's prehistoric large marsupial mammals are extinct due to the impact they had on the land when they first arrived from PNG.
Yeah, any animals they could hunt easily were extinct by then.Bubbalo wrote:
I think you'll find that by the time Europeans arrived they were living in a fairly sustainable manner.Flecco wrote:
Aboriginals did not use sustainable techniques for hunting, despite popular belief. Most of Australia's prehistoric large marsupial mammals are extinct due to the impact they had on the land when they first arrived from PNG.
Last edited by Flecco (2007-01-13 04:29:50)
Yes, I just get sick of people claiming they had a sustainable lifestyle. The only reason that their methods were sustainable was because they couldn't build the necessary population to make it unsustainable. The conditions were too harsh. From what I know of them, they gave very little thought to sustaining the environment in the past, they just assumed that the animals would repopulate eventually.Bubbalo wrote:
Exactly. When any animal is added to anb ecosystem it takes time for the system to stabilise.
Last edited by Flecco (2007-01-13 04:48:18)
For a time - for a long time - they were the most advanced humans on the planet. They managed to build fairly long-distance boats long before anyone else. They had religion and religious ceremonies - such as burial and initiation (not to mention some of the more amazing ones) thousands of years before others.Macca wrote:
Australian Aborigines lived in a society where everything is everyones. The whole camp or group shared everything, except one or two items which one Aboriginal called his.
It is believed that they came to Australia over 20,000 years ago when there was an ice shelf between Asia and Oceania.
Whilst the British classed them as "savages", their knowledge on medicinal herbs and roots surrounding Australia was outstanding. Their natural medicine was believed to be alot better than what the Britains had at the time.
Now, In a sense you can relate to them more as Native Americans, mainly because of they way Aborignes and the Native Americans where treated at the time.