Lawyers.Fen321 wrote:
Well if that were the case why is it that in the states EVERYONE is assumed guilty of drug usage and subject to random drug test when in all fairness a vast majority are not "guilty" of doing anything of the like?
Put quite simply, without a basis like that, there is no need for a legal system. Suspected offenders would be shot on site.aardfrith wrote:
I believe this is one of the cornerstones to a decent, honourable legal system. Every man should be judged innocent until proof of guilt, beyond reasonable doubt, is produced to the contrary. And even then, he should have the chance to defend himself.
What do you think?
On Lawyers at 2:41usmarine2007 wrote:
Lawyers.Fen321 wrote:
Well if that were the case why is it that in the states EVERYONE is assumed guilty of drug usage and subject to random drug test when in all fairness a vast majority are not "guilty" of doing anything of the like?
Unfortunately many First World Countries do not respect the principle of "Innocent Until Proven Guilty" as well.Parker wrote:
ya i think society has covered all that............those that still havent caught on can be found on the "Third World Shithole Country" list.....