BF2S Forums Is Nudity Really Bad?

I think it's only bad because children are not exposed to nude adults very often in this society. I personally don't want my children to see naked adults, at least until they are masturbation age.

Not wrote:

It's certainly not as bad as letting them play GTA where they can kill prostitutes after fucking em in the back of their Hummer to get their money back.

Indeed... yet the latter is more likely.
If my girlfriend ever heard what they say on "Saints Row"(similar game) she'd kick my ass..

PBAsydney wrote:

I started looking at internet pr0n when I was around 10 or 11, and surely I'm pretty normal.

I was climbing trees and shit..lol It's probably a generation gap. Kids went outside when I was younger.. .

Last edited by Kmarion (2007-01-17 16:39:07)

PBAsydney wrote:

I started looking at internet pr0n when I was around 10 or 11, and surely I'm pretty normal.

lol unfortunantly i am with you in that age group. a couple years later everyone at my school talks about it sex and porn and whatever...there is no real way from stopping them imho because i know a very large number of kids know what it is...some even have sex already...

Nudity is not bad in the correct context.  Like my wife's nudity when the two of us are alone . . . woohoo!   Sex certainly is natural and fortunately I see most of us agree kids don’t need to see sex and nudity.  Why?  Children haven’t matured enough to understand a mature body.  They understand that their sexual organs function in the bathroom and that’s about it.  When parents find that their kids are the right age to handle the info, the kids should be educated about the sexual nature of their bodies.  That way, as some one else mentioned, their curiosity doesn’t get them in trouble and they end up being perverts.   

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Nudity is associated with the propriety aspect of certain cultures . . . Just mostly tasteless...ugh, I hate seeing beer bellies and ass cracks in restaurants. Think I want to see the whole deal?  And using "caveman kids" as a basis for social comparison to the modern world is also invalid.

Agree.  Beer bellies and buttcrack . . .yuck.

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

How about every other animal in the kingdom is nude along with there own special attributes and acts that we dont neccesarily have to copy.

Exactly, even if one believes we’re animals, we don’t have to act like them. 

Cubanpenguin wrote:

The sad thing though is if we were all allowed to walk around naked and we saw naked woman on TV all the time it wouldn't be nearly as fun when we are finally able to take a chicks clothes off. So if the government wants to censer it, go ahead as long as I can still do it at home.

This is actually a good point.  If full nudity surrounded us every day, it would lose it’s intrigue and special nature. 

Ridir wrote:

On a serious note, nudity is an American Social Taboo due to lobbiest representing over protective parents.  This is the same reason why you could be sued for just about anything, they want to restrict the freedoms you have.  A topless woman is going to do less harm to someone of any age then seeing murder, slaughter, and combat in tv and movies.  In my personal opinion nudity is fine for everyone, but porn and the act of sex isn't for the youngest.

Overprotective parents?  Hmmm.  If you have a daughter someday perhaps you will understand the instinct to protect her.  Safety is a factor to be considered here.  If a girl is showing off a lot of assets they’re much more likely to attract the wrong kind of attention.  I, for one, do not see it as an advance in society that girls from 12-16 are having sex because they're not mature enough to make that decision yet.  I feel bad for them when they're stuck dealing with all the consequences and the horny little guy they just had sex with is long gone.

some_random_panda wrote:

Uh...someone gave me Karma with the message
"+ 1 u, u + 1 me, pea....tear...griffen"
As there is no name, sadly I cannot return the favour.

that's the guys name, pea-tear-griffen

PBAsydney wrote:

I started looking at internet pr0n when I was around 10 or 11, and surely I'm pretty normal.

I am jealous.  We had to hide a playboy in the woods in order too look at porn at that age.

chittydog wrote:

This whole phobia of nudity is a leftover from the Puritans. Why would it hurt someone to see people the way they were made? Sex is a whole different story though. Kids don't need to see that.

Because some women just need to cover up!!!!!

Nudity is bad, baby jesus would never approve.

Stealth42o wrote:

Nudity is bad, baby jesus would never approve.

but mostly naked woman with their hands down their pants are a-okay

If a kid sees a naked woman or man, I don't think he will think sexually about it..
I mean; boys are running around showing their pennisses to random people because all they know about it is; "I have it and girls don't" ..

IMO;
Nudity (normal nudity, like someone stepping out of a shower, someone changing clothes, etc.) with under-aged children = no problem, 'cause they (normally) don't realize the sexual aspect of it..
Nudity (again normal nudity) with adults or adolescents = not really a problem 'cause I doubt that they will go "OMG WTF OMG OMG!!!!" Of course if they aren't mature enough to know the sexual aspect of nudity, and to handle it..
Nudity (like in porn-alike pictures) with under-aged children = not good.. Their minds aren't yet ready to understand in a correct way what sex etc. is..
Nudity (like in porn-alike pictures) with adults or adolescents = ok by me.. they can handle it..

Of course I'm talking about nudity in places you can expect it or in private.. You won't see me aproving when some guy/girl is walking around naked in a shopping street..

Last edited by D34TH_D34L3R (2007-01-18 07:05:51)