I hated that the hind in sf is also for russians, I think they should of atleast chose the mi-28 for russians or added the KA-50 Shark.
What do you guys think?
What do you guys think?
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Pages: 1
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Expansions/Mods »
- Special Forces »
- The Hind for russians
Err.
definitely, the russians arnt that crap
Indeed, your answer is correct 'Err'. And your prize is a trip to Google!polarbearz wrote:
Err.
http://images.google.com/images?svnum=1 … tnG=Search
But why put in that old relic of the past? There is also a mk2.
http://images.google.com/images?svnum=1 … tnG=Search
But back on topic. Putting in a KA-50 would be a good thing for the Russian Spetz as a force.
On the down side, the KA-50 has no controlable, as in turnable, gun (2 guns pods under each 'wing').
And to me it would be a challenge, but 90% of the BF2:SF players would start bitch'n over this if they had to fire the guns like the current missiles .
The KA-50 mk2. DOES have a turnable gun, but it is on one side only (right-side, underneath the 'wing').
http://flavioaap.vilabol.uol.com.br/hel … 0-2_03.jpg
It would be cool to hear the rumble of those two rotor blades coming closer .
And while we are at it, put in a Sikorsky SH3-Seaking instead of those blackhawks, on missions where there is a carrier involved. A UH-Tiger for the SAS forces (UH-Tiger is an european attack helicopter).
Let the MECSF keep their Mi-28 Havoc, but give the Insurgents and Rebels something else. Asfar as I can recall Afghanistan Rebels had nothing but RPG's to fight of the Russian Mi-24 Hind's.
Last edited by Bernadictus (2006-01-05 09:18:40)
there are a few problems with outdated equipment (just look at the chinese being armed with ak's for example) - the hinds are cool tho! the only problem is that they didn't give them their troop carrying capacity, and made their cannon weaker than the bloody hand guns
My biggest gripe is that they use US helos for SAS. It is conceivable that the insurgents, etc. would have Russian equipment, but the English have their own helicopters. If they thought it would be too difficult to add two new helos for the Brits, then they shouldn't have made SAS maps with Helos.
Yes it is odd the chinese armed with AK's. You would have thought that the MEC would have AK47's & the chinese AK-101's if anything. Its not so odd that The English side gets Apache's since the British did buy some from the Americans I heard. But it is odd that the SAS would be using them :s Then again its odd that medics & assault etc can fly planes, choppers, drive tanks APC's etc... Wow they must have ace basic training in 2007
true, i loathe the way it handles, but it goes up much faster than the other choppers, thanks to it's more powerful engines - which is a distinct advantge in chopper vs. choppers situations, because they are usually settled by a TV hit<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:
The Hind handles like a god damn troop transport... so they should allow 2 troops in the rear. The Apache is clearly much more maneuvrable and the firepower slightly greater than the hind.
Their engines are far more powerfull so their climbing speed is much higher, they weigh much more so they go down much faster, and last but not least, because of their weight and bigness they are ideal for sideways flying.<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:
The Hind handles like a god damn troop transport... so they should allow 2 troops in the rear. The Apache is clearly much more maneuvrable and the firepower slightly greater than the hind.
I have made numerous kills that way with the MI-24, but the same tactic with and AH-64 or AH-1Z results in an uncontrolable flight.
I love my big MI-24. Though it's big, fat and even ugly and not as streamlined as it's counterparts it packs a far more deadly punch than the Apache or Cobra combined (in real life that is).
Putting in a trooptransport function would be an option, since that is the original purpose of this behemoth.
A heavily armed troop transport.
Last edited by Bernadictus (2006-01-05 16:34:56)
i have always thought they looked awesome. second coolest looking chopper in the game, behind the havocBernadictus wrote:
I love my big MI-24. Though it's big, fat and even ugly
I don't have a problem with the Rebals, Insurgents, and MEC with having hind, after all, they do have outdated equipment, but the mi-28 replaced the mi-24 hind for the Russians.Bernadictus wrote:
It would be cool to hear the rumble of those two rotor blades coming closer .
And while we are at it, put in a Sikorsky SH3-Seaking instead of those blackhawks, on missions where there is a carrier involved. A UH-Tiger for the SAS forces (UH-Tiger is an european attack helicopter).
Let the MECSF keep their Mi-28 Havoc, but give the Insurgents and Rebels something else. Asfar as I can recall Afghanistan Rebels had nothing but RPG's to fight of the Russian Mi-24 Hind's.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
the ka-50 mk 2 was a joint venture between russia and israel. it never left the drawing board. those pictures you found are wooden mockups.Bernadictus wrote:
But why put in that old relic of the past? There is also a mk2.polarbearz wrote:
Err.
what i really would like to see in bf2:sf is the russian ka-56. it is perfect for night missions by the russian special forces.
http://avia.russian.ee/helicopters_eng/ka-56-r.html
http://avia.russian.ee/helicopters_eng/ka-56-r.html
Now that's funny. They could put straws on the sides to shoot spitballs as well, or rubberband guns.bigelectricat wrote:
what i really would like to see in bf2:sf is the russian ka-56. it is perfect for night missions by the russian special forces.
http://avia.russian.ee/helicopters_eng/ka-56-r.html
Don't worry about mock-ups and the like. This is the near future, after all. And consider the Mk3A1 Jackhammer- it too never really left the drawing board, but we get to use it in the game
you might get more kills with those than the dumbed down m95.psychotoxic187 wrote:
Now that's funny. They could put straws on the sides to shoot spitballs as well, or rubberband guns.
that is whats funny about the logic used by the game developer. they give us first generation nightvision goggles and then decide to include weapons still in development.fikraag7 wrote:
Don't worry about mock-ups and the like. This is the near future, after all. And consider the Mk3A1 Jackhammer- it too never really left the drawing board, but we get to use it in the game
Pages: 1
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Expansions/Mods »
- Special Forces »
- The Hind for russians