Actually, critique is a noun, criticizing is the verb... Sorry. Just had to point that out.Defiance wrote:
Critics? Critique is a verb, not a noun, you (well, not you) don't need research to know that.Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
I must have posted something right my karma just went from 48 to 52. Blow that out your ass critiques.
Oh, and you don't account for the fact that there's no more negative karma, or have you not been around long enough?
Oh, that's a hard one.Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
Somebody draw up a list of names of whos gonna close this thread first so we can start taking bets.
Bet-wise, that is.
Last edited by acEofspadEs6313 (2007-02-06 21:52:10)
thats because you fit into that category.iNeedUrFace4Soup wrote:
I question #6.
You was better off not even posting.
Last edited by Drunken_Tankdriver (2007-02-06 21:52:57)
I guess I sort of go in #7. But I've only had one thread closed and only one person has bitched at me, concerning something about testicles. Now who was that?
I must make sure that my demographic is represented fairly.Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
That makes perfect sense. +1 for you.Cougar wrote:
8: Users that hate everyone (almost). They only post because they love seeing people make asses of themselves or feel the need to smack someone with a logic/truth/reality bomb.
In his context, he was calling me and others "critiques" when a "critique" is not an adjective to describe a person. If he wanted to name someone in their act of criticizing or making a critique, that person would be a critic.Jello.01 wrote:
Actually, critique is a noun, criticizing is the verb... Sorry. Just had to point that out.Defiance wrote:
Critics? Critique is a verb, not a noun, you (well, not you) don't need research to know that.Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
I must have posted something right my karma just went from 48 to 52. Blow that out your ass critiques.
Oh, and you don't account for the fact that there's no more negative karma, or have you not been around long enough?
Oh Cougar... well said.Cougar wrote:
8: Users that hate everyone (almost). They only post because they love seeing people make asses of themselves or feel the need to smack someone with a logic/truth/reality bomb.
Last edited by Defiance (2007-02-06 21:55:55)
Everyone say hello to the youngest grammar nazi on the forums!Defiance wrote:
In his context, he was calling me and others "critiques" when a "critique" is not an adjective to describe a person. If he wanted to name someone in their act of criticizing or making a critique, that person would be a critic.Jello.01 wrote:
Actually, critique is a noun, criticizing is the verb... Sorry. Just had to point that out.Defiance wrote:
Critics? Critique is a verb, not a noun, you (well, not you) don't need research to know that.
Oh, and you don't account for the fact that there's no more negative karma, or have you not been around long enough?
Hi Grammar Nazi!
Hi.Cougar wrote:
Everyone say hello to the youngest grammar nazi on the forums!Defiance wrote:
In his context, he was calling me and others "critiques" when a "critique" is not an adjective to describe a person. If he wanted to name someone in their act of criticizing or making a critique, that person would be a critic.Jello.01 wrote:
Actually, critique is a noun, criticizing is the verb... Sorry. Just had to point that out.
Hi Grammar Nazi!
I concede. +1 I read it in a different context.Defiance wrote:
In his context, he was calling me and others "critiques" when a "critique" is not an adjective to describe a person. If he wanted to name someone in their act of criticizing or making a critique, that person would be a critic.Jello.01 wrote:
Actually, critique is a noun, criticizing is the verb... Sorry. Just had to point that out.Defiance wrote:
Critics? Critique is a verb, not a noun, you (well, not you) don't need research to know that.
Oh, and you don't account for the fact that there's no more negative karma, or have you not been around long enough?Oh Cougar... well said.Cougar wrote:
8: Users that hate everyone (almost). They only post because they love seeing people make asses of themselves or feel the need to smack someone with a logic/truth/reality bomb.
wait, where do the neocons sit? there's a solid contengent of neocons to argue with the bleeding heart liberals. i probably sit right between the two camps, so it makes me grin to see them fight.
Fair to say, but I wouldn't have posted if it wasn't against myself.Cougar wrote:
Everyone say hello to the youngest grammar nazi on the forums!Defiance wrote:
In his context, he was calling me and others "critiques" when a "critique" is not an adjective to describe a person. If he wanted to name someone in their act of criticizing or making a critique, that person would be a critic.Jello.01 wrote:
Actually, critique is a noun, criticizing is the verb... Sorry. Just had to point that out.
Hi Grammar Nazi!
Where do I fit in that fine categorization? As far as I could tell, I'm a little bit of all. (Even Cougs group).
I need around tree fiddy.
We made the neocons sit in the corner. They're on "time out".kilgoretrout wrote:
wait, where do the neocons sit? there's a solid contengent of neocons to argue with the bleeding heart liberals. i probably sit right between the two camps, so it makes me grin to see them fight.
Wow you just fit into category 1 as well. You fight to the end dont you?Defiance wrote:
In his context, he was calling me and others "critiques" when a "critique" is not an adjective to describe a person. If he wanted to name someone in their act of criticizing or making a critique, that person would be a critic.Jello.01 wrote:
Actually, critique is a noun, criticizing is the verb... Sorry. Just had to point that out.Defiance wrote:
Critics? Critique is a verb, not a noun, you (well, not you) don't need research to know that.
Oh, and you don't account for the fact that there's no more negative karma, or have you not been around long enough?Oh Cougar... well said.Cougar wrote:
8: Users that hate everyone (almost). They only post because they love seeing people make asses of themselves or feel the need to smack someone with a logic/truth/reality bomb.
Come on, you and I both know what an annoying perfectionist you can be sometimes.Defiance wrote:
Fair to say, but I wouldn't have posted if it wasn't against myself.Cougar wrote:
Everyone say hello to the youngest grammar nazi on the forums!Defiance wrote:
In his context, he was calling me and others "critiques" when a "critique" is not an adjective to describe a person. If he wanted to name someone in their act of criticizing or making a critique, that person would be a critic.
Hi Grammar Nazi!
I seem to remember you taking down our server a few times to correct extremely minor discrepancies.
Drunken_Tankdriver, surely you fit into one of these catagories. Please, wise one, tell us which one.
so what does that make you?Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
I can put all of the forums users into 7 categories.
1. Theres the group of people that try to look intelligent by breaking down every sentance of someones "factual" post and critiques every word of it with a bunch of shit that they probably spent hours researching to prove them wrong so they can look smart.
2. Then there is the tools that are wishing they were a forum admin or moderator. Jumping in everyones shit for not searching or not spelling worth a fuck so they can possibly get elected to spend their tons of spare time abusing their powers to fuel their power trip they just got becasue this is probably the first board they've ever had any power on. (Got to take a hard day of getting picked on in school out on somebody right?)
3. Then you got your future residents of canada. A bunch of extremely liberal pukes that dispise of their own country and deserve to get deported. They post their views on the internet because they know nobody can touch them out of retalliation against their retarded opinions. (USA residents only)
4. Then you got your damn foreigners that like to talk shit about america that they know nothing about, other than what opinions they can draw off of biased media.
5. You got your elected power trip guys that close threads because they well, um, can. and always like to put their last word in!
6. you always got your random idiot thats still going to question something, like this thread here basically. To those i say, fuck you.
7. then there is your regular users. Some dont post, some do. Some dont know nothin about a forum yet they still get bitched at, threads butchered/closed.
nuff said.
don't say number seven, by the way. because you're not.
regular users are not racist. nor do they embody the southern stereotype.
"I can't block the door, wah wah, I can't move the couch, wah wah. Defiance fix it, wah wah."Cougar wrote:
Come on, you and I both know what an annoying perfectionist you can be sometimes.Defiance wrote:
Fair to say, but I wouldn't have posted if it wasn't against myself.Cougar wrote:
Everyone say hello to the youngest grammar nazi on the forums!
Hi Grammar Nazi!
I seem to remember you taking down our server a few times to correct extremely minor discrepancies.
And I am an annoying perfectionist, It's not very smart to diagnose myself but I do act a bit OCDish sometimes... most of the time... all of the time...
EDIT: "Not enough ammo for the shotgun, wah wah!!!"
Shush, You're done.Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
Wow you just fit into category 1 as well. You fight to the end dont you?
Last edited by Defiance (2007-02-06 22:04:16)
You spelt "sentence" incorrectly.Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
1. Theres the group of people that try to look intelligent by breaking down every sentance of someones "factual" post and critiques every word of it with a bunch of shit that they probably spent hours researching to prove them wrong so they can look smart.
Darn, guess that puts me in category 1, lol.
Oh i'm number 7, except with a think outside of the box personality that happens to piss some people off.
Last edited by Drunken_Tankdriver (2007-02-06 22:05:26)
this is the Junk Drawer. were allowed to post anything as long as it doesnt break the forums rules, (+lolcats +gifspam).
and i don't seem to fit into any group listed in 1st post.
edit:grammzor
and i don't seem to fit into any group listed in 1st post.
edit:grammzor
Last edited by Sneaky.Russian (2007-02-06 22:05:35)
you've just disproved your entire beginning post. thanks.Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
Oh i'm number 7, except with a think outside of the box personality that happens to piss some people off.
Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
I can put all of the forums users into 7 categories.
Yea you do, #7, your a forum user.Sneaky.Russian wrote:
this is the Junk Drawer. were allowed to post anything as long as it doesnt break the forums rules, (+lolcats +gifspam).
and i don't seem to fit into any group listed in 1st post.
edit:grammzor
Since when are you the one who decides what "category" we all fall into?Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
Yea you do, #7, your a forum user.Sneaky.Russian wrote:
this is the Junk Drawer. were allowed to post anything as long as it doesnt break the forums rules, (+lolcats +gifspam).
and i don't seem to fit into any group listed in 1st post.
edit:grammzor
Wow, another cateogry #1 user.Ender2309 wrote:
you've just disproved your entire beginning post. thanks.Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
Oh i'm number 7, except with a think outside of the box personality that happens to piss some people off.Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:
I can put all of the forums users into 7 categories.