BF2S Forums this forum is funny

Defiance wrote:

Cougar wrote:

Defiance wrote:

Fair to say, but I wouldn't have posted if it wasn't against myself.

Come on, you and I both know what an annoying perfectionist you can be sometimes. 

I seem to remember you taking down our server a few times to correct extremely minor discrepancies.

"I can't block the door, wah wah, I can't move the couch, wah wah. Defiance fix it, wah wah."

And I am an annoying perfectionist, It's not very smart to diagnose myself but I do act a bit OCDish sometimes... most of the time... all of the time...

EDIT: "Not enough ammo for the shotgun, wah wah!!!"

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Wow you just fit into category 1 as well. You fight to the end dont you?

Shush, You're done.

Wouldn't have had to say those things if you would have shown me how to edit the server myself.  No, instead it was always, "Yeah, so you do it like.............well here I'll just do it.".  I finally had to sit there and figure it out for myself turd.

"I can't guys, my guild is in a massive WoW raid and I'll get in trouble..."

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Ender2309 wrote:

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Oh i'm number 7, except with a think outside of the box personality that happens to piss some people off.

you've just disproved your entire beginning post. thanks.

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

I can put all of the forums users into 7 categories.

Wow, another cateogry #1 user.

Wait a tick.  You can't make a post like this and categorize yourself into the "good group".

Fix that.

Cougar wrote:

Defiance wrote:

Cougar wrote:

Come on, you and I both know what an annoying perfectionist you can be sometimes. 

I seem to remember you taking down our server a few times to correct extremely minor discrepancies.

"I can't block the door, wah wah, I can't move the couch, wah wah. Defiance fix it, wah wah."

And I am an annoying perfectionist, It's not very smart to diagnose myself but I do act a bit OCDish sometimes... most of the time... all of the time...

EDIT: "Not enough ammo for the shotgun, wah wah!!!"

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Wow you just fit into category 1 as well. You fight to the end dont you?

Shush, You're done.

Wouldn't have had to say those things if you would have shown me how to edit the server myself.  No, instead it was always, "Yeah, so you do it like.............well here I'll just do it.".  I finally had to sit there and figure it out for myself turd.

"I can't guys, my guild is in a massive WoW raid and I'll get in trouble..."

I'm on xfire all the time and almost always am since I rarely turn my comp off, haven't gotten a message in months, least you could've done is ask through that if you needed me. Provided if I was playing wow I could still talk and it would've probobly been more motivation to talk you through it.

Plus I'm utter shit at trying to explain things to people, so I end up doing the work myself. Another bad quirk.

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Ender2309 wrote:

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Wow, another cateogry #1 user.

...digging yourself deeper....

1. Theres the group of people that try to look intelligent by breaking down every sentance of someones "factual" post and critiques every word of it with a bunch of shit that they probably spent hours researching to prove them wrong so they can look smart.

according to your own words, to be in category 1, i'd need to do hours of research, critique every word (i didn't critique a thing, do you need a definition to prove this?) and your post would actually have to be factual.

I never did mention over dramatization actually meant anything. Nice try now go back to category #1.

what the hell does this mean?

Ender2309 wrote:

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Ender2309 wrote:

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Wow, another cateogry #1 user.

...digging yourself deeper....


according to your own words, to be in category 1, i'd need to do hours of research, critique every word (i didn't critique a thing, do you need a definition to prove this?) and your post would actually have to be factual.

I never did mention over dramatization actually meant anything. Nice try now go back to category #1.

what the hell does this mean?

"Don't argue with fools, for they will drag you to their level and beat you with experience."

Although for the sake of entertainment, have at.

acEofspadEs6313 wrote:

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Sneaky.Russian wrote:

this is the Junk Drawer. were allowed to post anything as long as it doesnt break the forums rules, (+lolcats +gifspam).
and i don't seem to fit into any group listed in 1st post.

edit:grammzor

Yea you do, #7, your a forum user.

Since when are you the one who decides what "category" we all fall into?

Ender2309 wrote:

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Ender2309 wrote:

what the hell does this mean?

lol, own3d.

i think you missed my point.

you've effectively said nothing.

what does being "overly dramatic" have to do with anything? at all?
...unless of course you're sitting at home crying whilst slitting your wrists or something.

you "own3d" yourself.

You dolt.

You dont actually have to research for hours on end to prove somebody wrong. There are people that actually pay too much attention to things and know things that the average person doesnt know and then they call their bluff out immediatly. Or someone trying to prove another one wrong could have made a 5 minute google search to find a "fact". Hence my point over dramitization (searching for hours), doesnt mean shit. The person disecting anothers post proving them wrong is still doing what he does best, some dont need to research that long thats all. Too bad I had to point that out to you.

acEofspadEs6313 wrote:

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Sneaky.Russian wrote:

this is the Junk Drawer. were allowed to post anything as long as it doesnt break the forums rules, (+lolcats +gifspam).
and i don't seem to fit into any group listed in 1st post.

edit:grammzor

Yea you do, #7, your a forum user.

Since when are you the one who decides what "category" we all fall into?

i dont mind #7

Ender2309 wrote:

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Ender2309 wrote:

i think you missed my point.

you've effectively said nothing.

what does being "overly dramatic" have to do with anything? at all?
...unless of course you're sitting at home crying whilst slitting your wrists or something.

you "own3d" yourself.

You dolt.

You dont actually have to research for hours on end to prove somebody wrong. There are people that actually pay too much attention to things and know things that the average person doesnt know and then they call their bluff out immediatly. Or someone trying to prove another one wrong could have made a 5 minute google search to find a "fact". Hence my point over dramitization (searching for hours), doesnt mean shit. The person disecting anothers post proving them wrong is still doing what he does best, some dont need to research that long thats all. Too bad I had to point that out to you.

the only thing you had to point out was your incorrect definition.

you've pretty much group  oned yourself, by the way.

I dont think so. You just dont like the fact that I had to explain something that you didnt understand.

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Ender2309 wrote:

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

You dolt.

You dont actually have to research for hours on end to prove somebody wrong. There are people that actually pay too much attention to things and know things that the average person doesnt know and then they call their bluff out immediatly. Or someone trying to prove another one wrong could have made a 5 minute google search to find a "fact". Hence my point over dramitization (searching for hours), doesnt mean shit. The person disecting anothers post proving them wrong is still doing what he does best, some dont need to research that long thats all. Too bad I had to point that out to you.

the only thing you had to point out was your incorrect definition.

you've pretty much group  oned yourself, by the way.

I dont think so. You just dont like the fact that I had to explain something that you didnt understand.

no, i honestly don't mind that.

the fact of the matter is though, i attempted to disprove you...with fact...and you disproved me...with fact.


this qualifies you for group one. you're actually arguing with me now, rather than just telling me to enter a group. therefore, you're group one too.

don't worry though, the rest of us will accept you.

so what number am I?

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Ender2309 wrote:

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Oh i'm number 7, except with a think outside of the box personality that happens to piss some people off.

you've just disproved your entire beginning post. thanks.

Wow, another cateogry #1 user.

Wait a tick.  You can't make a post like this and categorize yourself into the "good group".

Fix that.

Last edited by Cougar (2007-02-06 22:34:56)

Cougar wrote:

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

Ender2309 wrote:

you've just disproved your entire beginning post. thanks.

Wow, another cateogry #1 user.

Wait a tick.  You can't make a post like this and categorize yourself into the "good group".

Fix that.

Why should I try to put myself into a group when I speak the truth about the majority of active users here? Besides, I already answered that question.


Maybe if you would have searched the thread out better you would have noticed that. Oh wait. i just purpously put myself in group 2 partially. (search nazi quote) 

Happy now dude?

Last edited by Drunken_Tankdriver (2007-02-06 22:40:27)