Now I can take porn pictures of my sister! j/k
Now I can take porn pictures of my sister! j/k
...that doesn't look like a camera.
If it is, it aint that sweet!ThomasMorgan wrote:
...that doesn't look like a camera.
JK
Pics of your sis would be nice though.
Last edited by viper313 (2007-02-07 16:16:22)
I dont see any camera... its more like how you call it ??? oh yea a PC
Stop being ass holes its the image quality foos... !
That's actually rather bad. What camera is it? And did you take that at some high ISO setting? Cause there's more noise on that screen than when I try to tune my TV in to some Chinese over-the-air TV channel. Not trying to be a dick; it's a problem I have with my camera too when I zoom in fully on a file.
Looks good(PC & image), what kind did ya get?
I don't get it.
Quality isn't that good to me. And besides, it's not 3D. It's 2007 dude! LOL just messin.
If you guys only knew what camera I was using then you would know why I love this camera.
http://reviews.cnet.com/Polaroid_PDC_30 … 80069.html <--- Old camera.
http://reviews.cnet.com/Polaroid_PDC_30 … 80069.html <--- Old camera.
I have a Canon SD600. It's old but I love it! But you know, any digi is better than no digi. I remember the days of disposables. Oh man, you never knew if your thumb was covering the darn picture up until it got developed.
Pretty much anything other than full-frame is gonna do that to you though, of course the higher the quality of the camera's sensor/lenses, the higher the image quality & the higher the image quality = less noise & stuff at full-size.Hurricane wrote:
That's actually rather bad. What camera is it? And did you take that at some high ISO setting? Cause there's more noise on that screen than when I try to tune my TV in to some Chinese over-the-air TV channel. Not trying to be a dick; it's a problem I have with my camera too when I zoom in fully on a file.
nice pic for the camera, but that is it. If you compare it to better ones, yours gets owned.
So, you're saying better is better than not as good? I don't believe it.jcurts wrote:
nice pic for the camera, but that is it. If you compare it to better ones, yours gets owned.
It is a good camera, and the quality of the picture is ok. It is also a big difference compared to the one you had ( polaroid ).
I had a sony ( and it sucked ), after that, upgraded it to a olympus and now to a canon ( S2-IS ).
I dont really like the "small format" cameras, where you have to surf loads of menus to get something switched.
I had a sony ( and it sucked ), after that, upgraded it to a olympus and now to a canon ( S2-IS ).
I dont really like the "small format" cameras, where you have to surf loads of menus to get something switched.
is that good quality? i thought i've seen pics with better quality,Brizzzer wrote:
Stop being ass holes its the image quality foos... !
anyhow enjoy your new camera ;D
Hurry!!!Brizzzer wrote:
Now I can take porn pictures of my sister! j/k
You are not showing these noobs the true strength of the F20, indoor low-light people shooting. On that regard, porn pics of your sister would be better use for this camera.Brizzzer wrote:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16830122089
For best rig shots, you'll need a quality DSLR with a quality macro lens.
word i just bought a new macro lens and it should be in today. i will email my reply back asap tonight.Ilocano wrote:
You are not showing these noobs the true strength of the F20, indoor low-light people shooting. On that regard, porn pics of your sister would be better use for this camera.Brizzzer wrote:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16830122089
For best rig shots, you'll need a quality DSLR with a quality macro lens.
yea a pic of your SIS would be nice!