Just a small, predictable vote. Just explain reasons why you prefer what you chose. I chose EU, i chose PAC, all vehicles, looks, and weapons are cooler in my opinion.
Poll
PAC or EU?
| Pac | 48% | 48% - 66 | ||||
| Eu | 21% | 21% - 29 | ||||
| I don't mind, i like them both. | 29% | 29% - 40 | ||||
| Total: 135 | ||||||
Come on EU (just because I'm from there)! We can take those Pan-Asians any day - lets stir-fry them (apologies for a terrible joke)!
Last edited by TheDarkRaven (2007-02-17 03:10:16)
PAC-Krylov
Eu bacause im patriotic
I don't really mind, the only reason that i would choose PAC would be because of the Krylov but i am from the EU and understand what they are saying so it kind of balances out.
i just seem to win more with EU
I like the Pac tank and the EU uniforms but all in all, I don't mind.
I seem to do well with the PAC. I like the foreign radio commands.
-[Silver.Inc* wrote:
PAC-Krylov
-[Silver.Inc* wrote:
PAC-Krylov
Seriously, without being patriotic, i mean your feelings (Lol) IN game, not in real life.
park 52 - PAC
-[Silver.Inc* wrote:
PAC-Krylov
The PAC have better weapons and gunzzzzz but the EU look waaay cooler.
EU for infantry weapons, PAC for vehicles - love the hover tank.
PAC because im asian and their weapon owns..
EU because those floating tanks are shit.
Eu because the PAC walker has half as many bullets.
PAC do have a few better guns,like the Shuko and Krylov.
Oh and the PAC Gunship is a bit better,only because running to get in at the start is easier because you can get in it from the back.
PAC do have a few better guns,like the Shuko and Krylov.
Oh and the PAC Gunship is a bit better,only because running to get in at the start is easier because you can get in it from the back.
Apparently you haven't learned how to maneuver them. I can take a Tiger all day long with a Nekomata.CameronPoe wrote:
EU because those floating tanks are shit.
I'm a hover tank whore for life. When you can mow down every motherf**ker on the map with a single tank, you know you're that damn good.
EU cause all the maps are unfairly biased in their favour...
PAC high points
- Nekomata
- Takao 20 Pistol
- Krylov AR(I personally don't like it, most do though)
- Doragon Gunship
- Malkov SMG
EU high points
- Bianchi LMG
- Moretti SR
- The APCs aren't so high off the ground, so they're a smaller target and harder to flip (don't ask)
IMO PAC is slightly better. Both are pretty balenced though.
- Nekomata
- Takao 20 Pistol
- Krylov AR(I personally don't like it, most do though)
- Doragon Gunship
- Malkov SMG
EU high points
- Bianchi LMG
- Moretti SR
- The APCs aren't so high off the ground, so they're a smaller target and harder to flip (don't ask)
IMO PAC is slightly better. Both are pretty balenced though.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
The EU smg is better, IMHO, but eveything else is good for PAC.haffeysucks wrote:
PAC high points
- Nekomata
- Takao 20 Pistol
- Krylov AR(I personally don't like it, most do though)
- Doragon Gunship
- Malkov SMG
EU high points
- Bianchi LMG
- Moretti SR
- The APCs aren't so high off the ground, so they're a smaller target and harder to flip (don't ask)
IMO PAC is slightly better. Both are pretty balenced though.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
PACs Nakomata hover tank is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay beter (yes that much) than the EU tank. But EUs walker is alot better than PACs. Guns are pretty much the same except krylov>scar.
So its PAC by a hair.
So its PAC by a hair.
Last edited by zeidmaan (2007-02-17 09:17:27)
EU-Revolver, and i can understand them better.+ they have higher chance of winning in every single conquest map
Last edited by Ned_Z (2007-02-17 10:30:37)