Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7180
http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=130154

newzhunter wrote:

NVIDIA'S Geforce 8600 cards, based on the G84 die, should score about 4500 points in famous 3Dmark06. This mainstream card will go into production in March or April time and it will still use the 128-bit memory interface.
The card is of course DirectX 10 compatible and with it Nvidia will beat ATI to market in this sub-$200 market segment. This card will compete ATI's Radeon X2600 cards also known as RV630s.

Our little source also told us that this Nvidia card has 160 square mm die and compared to ATI's 65 nanometre competitor it will end up bigger. We don’t know about the yields but the numbers will settle prior to the launch.

G84 is all Vista DirectX 10 ready and we hope that Nvidia can make the WHQL Vista driver before that date.

We are sure Graphzilla can do it but we thought we should give it a pinch before it finally gets its finger out. µ

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37697
Sounds like it's around the same power as a 7900GS.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7064|132 and Bush

The card is of course DirectX 10 compatible and with it Nvidia will beat ATI to market in this sub-$200 market segment.
Wow.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
The#1Spot
Member
+105|7003|byah
I am very disappointed that its a sissy 128bit 256 memory card. I saved up $165 thinking that its a 256bit and 512 memory. I guess im going to wait for ati line up or spend it on something more worth while.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7180

Kmarion wrote:

The card is of course DirectX 10 compatible and with it Nvidia will beat ATI to market in this sub-$200 market segment.
Wow.
For now
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Cheez
Herman is a warmaphrodite
+1,027|6902|King Of The Islands

What's that in DownUnderBucks?
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7180

Cheez wrote:

What's that in DownUnderBucks?
Meh I'm saying around 270 aus.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
The Stillhouse Kid
Licensed Televulcanologist
+126|7105|Deep In The South Of Texas

The#1Spot wrote:

I am very disappointed that its a sissy 128bit 256 memory card. I saved up $165 thinking that its a 256bit and 512 memory. I guess im going to wait for ati line up or spend it on something more worth while.
I'm pretty sure this is for the 8600GT. The Ultra will most likely be 256-bit memory.
Sup3r_Dr4gon
Boat sig is not there anymore
+214|6791|Australia
It says it scores 4500 in 06 - but with what CPU and RAM?
BigglesPiP
Whirlybird Guy
+20|7012|Windermere, GB
Erm, there is one gaping hole in this report.


It's by "The Enquirer". They are always wrong, they can't do simple maths, and they've only just realised that the R600 isn't 65nm.
Brasso
member
+1,549|7094

Yeah, I'd like to see 8600 Ultra scores.  That's what I'm waiting for.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7180

haffeysucks wrote:

Yeah, I'd like to see 8600 Ultra scores.  That's what I'm waiting for.
Probably something like that, maybe 300 points more. But I think the problem is the drivers, they need to make them a lot better.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7045|SE London

More bullshit from the Enquirer. I'll hold out for some real benchmarks.
cospengle
Member
+140|6950|Armidale, NSW, Australia

The#1Spot wrote:

I am very disappointed that its a sissy 128bit 256 memory card. I saved up $165 thinking that its a 256bit and 512 memory. I guess im going to wait for ati line up or spend it on something more worth while.
But what could be more worth while than a new video card?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard