Lieutenant_Jensen
Your cops are corrupt.
+200|6837|fåking denmark
This is about "Ungdomshuset" (The House Of Youth) on Jagtvej 69 (Nørrebro) in Copenhagen day for day .

It starts in september as I remember. Back then, Copenhagen Council sat the house for sale.  On the house their was a banner that said: "til salg - inklusiv 500 stenkastende autonome unge fra Helvede!" (For sale - inclusive 500 stone-throwing autonomous young from Hell!). Was an religious group called "Faderhuset" (The Father House), that bought the house.
Dates that is importen about "Ungdomshuset" :


31/11 - 1982: Copenhagen Council gave the House to the youth of Copenhagen. Many mean that thay got the House, other mean they only got the right to use the house..
2001: "Faderhuset" bought "Ungdomshuset".
28/8 - 06: The young from "Ungdomshuset" lose in court in a case that was about the young wouldn't give away their house.
16/12 - 06: The young from "Ungdomshuset" demonstrate for keeping their house. Police meet the young with teargas and the young throws cobblestones and molotov cocktails and it ends up in streetfighing, the young vs. the police. The young stop the traffic by taking out containers and other things like that, and puts fire on it. 273 is arrested in the end, among these activists from Germany, Norway, Sweden and Holland.
14/1 - 07: The young occupies an empty building on Dortheavej in the northwestern part of Copenhagen.
16/1 - 07: The police of Copenhagen clears the occupied house. 94 is arrested.
3/2 - 07: More young from a young group occupies a new house on Grøndalsvænge Allé in the northwestern part of Copenhagen. 82 is arrested when cleared.
9/2 - 07: The youth have do agree before the date of 10 days later if they want to move to Stevnsgades closed down school.
1/3 - 07: The police of Copenhagen clears "Ungdomshuset" by landing on the roof with a chopper and drop of the police Action Force (The Danish police anti-terror force, former named "Politiets Anti-Terror korps, now Politiets Aktionsstyrke, AKS). 35 young that were in the house are arrested.
2/3-4/3 - 07: In the night young activists are in a fight vs. the police again, like 16/12 - 06. The youngs throws cobblestones and Molotov cocktails at the police. The police take teargas in action. A total of over 600 arrested after the fighing.
5/3 - 06: "Faderhuset" starts thedemolition of "Ungdomshuset". Mange young supporters of "Ungdomshuset" laying flowers at a crossroad at Nørrebro Runddel.
6/3 - 07: Machines keep up demolition of "Ungdomshuset". The young supporters are still at the crossroad at Nørrebro Runddel.
7/3 - 06: The Manager of "Københavns Bymuseum" (Copenhagen City Museum), starts an exhibition about "Ungdomshuset". He had got a brick and dust from "Ungdomshuset" and the ground it layed on. He also had got a burnt car tire, and other things from the streetfighing of the streets around Nørrebro (In Copenhagen).


If you have heard about it, then what do you think about it? Give your opinion about it.
Personally do I think it was stupid it all, and its Copenhagen Council fault the hole thing!


https://www.indymedia.dk/cache/imagecache/local/attachments/dec2006/300_0___20_0_0_0_0_0_img_4507.jpg
Demonstration in the streets of Copenhagen. The start of the riot in Copenhagen, in the streets of Nørrebro.
https://www.dr.dk/NR/rdonlyres/B17147C3-3714-4F0B-A670-1CE0549BCE68/399717/f34700e8c06647c6a134233e41b6148b_inumineq1.jpg
The front of "Ungdomshuset".

Last edited by Lieutenant_Jensen (2007-06-08 12:44:46)

herrr_smity
Member
+156|7074|space command ur anus
i have no sympathy for them, they are nothing more then terrorists
Magpie
international welder....Douchebag Dude, <3 ur mom
+257|6973|Milkystania, yurop
They (the council) had given the house to the youth in 1982 if im correct, and then they decide to take it back wtf its a gift the youth have to have some were to go and as i have understood the youth house was being used for good things concerts etc....And to send in the antirerror police by dropping them on the roof by helicopter that's so wrong that's not the danish way.....
Magpie
international welder....Douchebag Dude, <3 ur mom
+257|6973|Milkystania, yurop

herrr_smity wrote:

i have no sympathy for them, they are nothing more then terrorists
U r an idiot, just cause there young that dosent make them terrorists moron
Freke1
I play at night... mostly
+47|6993|the best galaxy
You are anachists - just abide by the LAW or You are my enemy.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/7d11696e2ffd4edeff06466095e98b0fab37462c.png
stef10
Member
+173|6928|Denmark
Hej jensen, jeg er også dansker.
Lieutenant_Jensen
Your cops are corrupt.
+200|6837|fåking denmark

Magpie wrote:

They (the council) had given the house to the youth in 1982 if im correct, and then they decide to take it back wtf its a gift the youth have to have some were to go and as i have understood the youth house was being used for good things concerts etc....And to send in the antirerror police by dropping them on the roof by helicopter that's so wrong that's not the danish way.....
Correct. It was given to them in 1982 . But the police drop police of on the roof by chopper.

http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Indland/2007/0 … m?rss=true (on danish)
BVC
Member
+325|7142
So they were given the house by the council, and then it was taken away?
Magpie
international welder....Douchebag Dude, <3 ur mom
+257|6973|Milkystania, yurop

Pubic wrote:

So they were given the house by the council, and then it was taken away?
A religious organisation bought the house from the council, and now they have torn the building down
madmurre
I suspect something is amiss
+117|7157|Sweden
Most of the idiots on the streets are only there for one reason and no it´s not the house, they are only their for fighting, vandalizing no sympathy with them at all.

Calling them terrorists might be a little bit harsh but the line between anarchists and terrorists ain't that far.
Lieutenant_Jensen
Your cops are corrupt.
+200|6837|fåking denmark

madmurre wrote:

Most of the idiots on the streets are only there for one reason and no it´s not the house, they are only their for fighting, vandalizing no sympathy with them at all.

Calling them terrorists might be a little bit harsh but the line between anarchists and terrorists ain't that far.
Yes you are right, some many that were fighting were only there for trouble, but the largest part, were there for The Youth House .
And yes, the line between an anarchist and a terrorist is long . The youngs who throwed stone at the police, who were fighting for the House, were autonomous and activists .
motherdear
Member
+25|7098|Denmark/Minnesota (depends)
well they never got the house, they were allowed to stay until a buyer bought it, and when they bought it they refused to leave.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|7008

herrr_smity wrote:

i have no sympathy for them, they are nothing more then terrorists
They didn't attack civilians.
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6840|The Gem Saloon

Bubbalo wrote:

herrr_smity wrote:

i have no sympathy for them, they are nothing more then terrorists
They didn't attack civilians.
because a terrorist is some that HAS to attack civilians....lol
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|7008
Or threaten to attack, yes.
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6840|The Gem Saloon
not really, but its ok if thats what you think.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|7008
Well then what, pray tell, is a terrorist?
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6840|The Gem Saloon
well a terrorist is someone that uses militaristic means to accomplish a political end. they dont HAVE to attack civilians. it can even be asymmetrical warfare, no shots fired at anyone. or ok, a religious end in alot of cases, but you see what i mean.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|7008
So then national militaries consist of terrorists?
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6840|The Gem Saloon
no those are armies that have been given an order to do a job that has been decided by the country for which they fight for.
terrorists dont get orders, they do what they feel. and even if they do, its not like a "terrorist congress" passed a bill saying that they should go and attack people.
good effort, but no.
and no, a terrorist is not someone who attacks civilians or threatens it......if that were the case then all the gangbangers in america would be labeled terrorists.
herrr_smity
Member
+156|7074|space command ur anus

Magpie wrote:

herrr_smity wrote:

i have no sympathy for them, they are nothing more then terrorists
U r an idiot, just cause there young that dosent make them terrorists moron
no burning cars and trowing molotov cocktails at the police makes them terrorists

Last edited by herrr_smity (2007-03-07 14:39:55)

Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|7008

Parker wrote:

no those are armies that have been given an order to do a job that has been decided by the country for which they fight for.
terrorists dont get orders, they do what they feel. and even if they do, its not like a "terrorist congress" passed a bill saying that they should go and attack people.
good effort, but no.
and no, a terrorist is not someone who attacks civilians or threatens it......if that were the case then all the gangbangers in america would be labeled terrorists.
Just out of sheer curiosity...........you notice anything interesting about the word "terrorist".  Like, any other words within it that might hint at it's etymology?
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6840|The Gem Saloon

herrr_smity wrote:

Magpie wrote:

herrr_smity wrote:

i have no sympathy for them, they are nothing more then terrorists
U r an idiot, just cause there young that dosent make them terrorists moron
no burning cars and trowing molotov cocktails at the police makes them terrorists
honestly it sounds like rioters.....the same things happen when people win a big football game, or whatever the reason is for large groups of people to gather. throw in booze and you have one large stupid group of people that will act completely irrational because the person next to them is doing the same thing.
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6840|The Gem Saloon

Bubbalo wrote:

Parker wrote:

no those are armies that have been given an order to do a job that has been decided by the country for which they fight for.
terrorists dont get orders, they do what they feel. and even if they do, its not like a "terrorist congress" passed a bill saying that they should go and attack people.
good effort, but no.
and no, a terrorist is not someone who attacks civilians or threatens it......if that were the case then all the gangbangers in america would be labeled terrorists.
Just out of sheer curiosity...........you notice anything interesting about the word "terrorist".  Like, any other words within it that might hint at it's etymology?
ok well, i said my piece.
you are obviously grasping at straws to defend that silly statement so go ahead, ive made my point.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|7008
So, you don't notice that it includes the word "terror".

Terrorism is the use of force or threat of force against civilians to achieve political ends.  A paramilitary group is not, necessarily, a terrorist group.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard