Pages: 1 2 3

 

2007-03-18 12:10:17
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7046|SE London

David.Podedworny wrote:

Mad Ad wrote:

No I firmly belive that an Nvidia cpu would be dead in the water if they try to compete with AMD/INTEL head on without their own fabs to drive the shrink too, theyd be too reliant on the spare capacity of 3rd party manufacturers and always be playing catchup on every front.
But theres a difference between the 2 one's big and one's small and the latter can afford a bigger R&D department. Example Core 2 is just a super charged P3 case closed.
lol.

You're so right. They're all just supercharged 8086s really (by that logic at least).

The C2D is vastly different from the P3.
2007-03-18 14:22:28
David.P
Banned
+649|6738

Bertster7 wrote:

lol.

You're so right. They're all just supercharged 8086s really (by that logic at least).

The C2D is vastly different from the P3.
Perhaps that was the wrong metaphor to use? What i meant is that i few something that is complex in it's most simple form's. I'll explain later gotta go.
2007-03-18 14:52:45
killinzero1
Member
+14|6852
i still think intel is better in way because they do comebacks
2007-03-18 18:43:34
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7230|Cambridge (UK)

Bertster7 wrote:

David.Podedworny wrote:

Mad Ad wrote:

No I firmly belive that an Nvidia cpu would be dead in the water if they try to compete with AMD/INTEL head on without their own fabs to drive the shrink too, theyd be too reliant on the spare capacity of 3rd party manufacturers and always be playing catchup on every front.
But theres a difference between the 2 one's big and one's small and the latter can afford a bigger R&D department. Example Core 2 is just a super charged P3 case closed.
lol.

You're so right. They're all just supercharged 8086s really (by that logic at least).

The C2D is vastly different from the P3.
Computers are just supercharged abacuses (abacii?).

 

Pages: 1 2 3

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard