Lest We Forget

2007-03-24 06:41:48

#351

Macca: Cylons' my kinda frak; +72|6892|Australia.

Dezerteagal5 wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
ATG wrote:
America does not offer up these most important sacrifices for nothing.
Yes, how kind of you to defend freedom as and when it suits you. Need I remind you that it wasn't until after Pearl Harbour that you joined WWII? And that in Vietnam you supported a corrupt government? Or that you supported an Iranian dictatorship (in fact, that you've supported many dictatorships)?

If there are any American soldiers who think that I owe them, fuck them. Australian soldiers don't declare that their people owe them. They merely expect the same rights as anyone else.

So, ATG, how about you go think about the fact that more Australians died per capita in WWI than any other nation, or the fact that even as the Japanese advanced on Australia our troops held Tobruk for our European allies. Then how about you stop telling me what I do or don't owe anyone.
Its not that soldiers demand you to 'owe' them, Just that you know they died helping your country and other countries. Face it, with out america, your puny little country, along with most other countries would be taken over by hitler now and you would be speaking german, BF2S wouldn't be here, and you wouldn't own a computer, nor possibly a house.
Respect America because without it the world would be shit.

AHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA

...what liez.

2007-03-24 08:20:48

#352

Liberal-Sl@yer: Certified BF2S Asshole; +131|6902|The edge of sanity

Bubbalo wrote:
Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:
I dont favor US policy at all. I think our policies are shit for the rest of the world, but the fact that you slam one country for fightin in a war without slaming all the countries that fought in that war is bullshit. Australia had much to gain or lose from the outcome of vietnam since most of its trade comes from southeast asia.
Uh-huh............so, the fact that when the US was being discussed I criticised US participation in Vietnam and not Australian participation is evidence of bias?

How about you admit that you were wrong, and that, even if we assume I do pick on the US, this wasn't evidence of it.

You notice how in the thread about the Cronulla riots I didn't comment on apartheid? Is that evidence that I favour South Africa?

It shows that you refuse to show both sides of the argument and ALL of the wrong doings by ALL of the countires which, yes, does in fact make you biased. Game set match

2007-03-24 21:47:56

#353

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7008

Uh...............what? You expect to list all wrongdoings of every country every time I post? Are you really that dense?

2007-03-24 21:49:38

#354

usmarine2007: Banned; +374|6814|Columbus, Ohio

Bubbalo wrote:
Uh...............what? You expect to list all wrongdoings of every country every time I post? Are you really that dense?

No need for a personal attack.

2007-03-25 02:06:49

#355

JaggedPanther: Member; +61|6920

golgoj4 wrote:
Pierre wrote:
deeznutz1245 wrote:

Very few countries have lost so many for a cause other than their own. America fights for humanity no matter what people say.
Sorry, that's a load of BS. US fights for it's own personal benefit, whether it be a political, economical or military goal, it's still "America first".
So fucking true. America only puts boot to ass for money. Otherwise we would have not given up on africa as a whole.

and besides me how many of u guys have even been near the service?

Nobody really believes that crap anyway. Self-delusional humanitarians lol, just wait until someone called 'arab-beater' or 'arab-killer' or some other neocon nazi prick comes and agrees with them (or if not here about 90% of other threads.

2007-03-25 07:48:39

#356

Liberal-Sl@yer: Certified BF2S Asshole; +131|6902|The edge of sanity

Bubbalo wrote:
Uh...............what? You expect to list all wrongdoings of every country every time I post? Are you really that dense?

Im just saying that you need to present more than a one sided argument. It dosent have to be destroing the country you like. In fact why not do a point counter point? Is that really much to ask? what it takes you like 3-4 to write a good point counter point post? and you will look a lot better writing something like that instead of "Are you really that dense?"

2007-03-25 07:53:29

#357

Varegg: Support fanatic :-); +2,206|7256|Nårvei

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
Uh...............what? You expect to list all wrongdoings of every country every time I post? Are you really that dense?
Im just saying that you need to present more than a one sided argument. It dosent have to be destroing the country you like. In fact why not do a point counter point? Is that really much to ask? what it takes you like 3-4 to write a good point counter point post? and you will look a lot better writing something like that instead of "Are you really that dense?"

And how often it that the case in DST ? .... most posts are one sided and not loosing its credibility for that sole reason, but i agree it would be a better debate if applied more often by more of the debatees !

Wait behind the line ..............................................................

2007-03-25 07:57:20

#358

daddyofdeath: A REAL Combat Engineer in the house; +187|6700|UK Bradford W,Yorks. Age 27

Aint this just a remember the fallen thread or an America vs the world thread now? We owe our freedom at the very least to those 'ordinary' men and women that die so we can have ours. That in my eyes gets my respect. Only the dead are the heroes. I for one thank all the heroes for that.

Last edited by daddyofdeath (2007-03-25 07:57:40)

2007-03-25 07:58:36

#359

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7008

usmarine2007 wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
Uh...............what? You expect to list all wrongdoings of every country every time I post? Are you really that dense?
No need for a personal attack.

You're a twit.

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:
Im just saying that you need to present more than a one sided argument. It dosent have to be destroing the country you like. In fact why not do a point counter point? Is that really much to ask? what it takes you like 3-4 to write a good point counter point post? and you will look a lot better writing something like that instead of "Are you really that dense?"

So, you're complaint is that I'm not arguing your side as well? In other words, you aren't dense, just lazy?

The point of a debate isn't to argue the other persons side, it's to argue yours. In a formal essay it's common to show the oppositions views, but that's because they aren't there to show it themselves. And, funnily enough, this isn't the place for formal essays.

2007-03-25 07:59:23

#360

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6976|Global Command

Still scratching my head as to why this thread is still alive.

2007-03-25 08:00:18

#361

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7008

You're so brilliant people just can't let your threads die, clearly.

2007-03-25 08:03:08

#362

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|7096

Bubbalo wrote:
usmarine2007 wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
Uh...............what? You expect to list all wrongdoings of every country every time I post? Are you really that dense?
No need for a personal attack.
You're a twat.

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:
Im just saying that you need to present more than a one sided argument. It dosent have to be destroing the country you like. In fact why not do a point counter point? Is that really much to ask? what it takes you like 3-4 to write a good point counter point post? and you will look a lot better writing something like that instead of "Are you really that dense?"
So, you're complaint is that I'm not arguing your side as well? In other words, you aren't dense, just lazy?

The point of a debate isn't to argue the other persons side, it's to argue yours. In a formal essay it's common to show the oppositions views, but that's because they aren't there to show it themselves. And, funnily enough, this isn't the place for formal essays.

C(orrected)FT

2007-03-25 08:06:19

#363

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6976|Global Command

Bubbalo wrote:
You're so retarded people just can't let your threads die, clearly.

Thats mean Lizard.

2007-03-25 08:08:39

#364

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7008

ATG wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
You're so retarded people just can't let your threads die, clearly.
You're the smartest person here Lizard.

Why thank you, thank you kindly.

2007-03-25 08:12:22

#365

Liberal-Sl@yer: Certified BF2S Asshole; +131|6902|The edge of sanity

Bubbalo wrote:
usmarine2007 wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
Uh...............what? You expect to list all wrongdoings of every country every time I post? Are you really that dense?
No need for a personal attack.
You're a twit.

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:
Im just saying that you need to present more than a one sided argument. It dosent have to be destroing the country you like. In fact why not do a point counter point? Is that really much to ask? what it takes you like 3-4 to write a good point counter point post? and you will look a lot better writing something like that instead of "Are you really that dense?"
So, you're complaint is that I'm not arguing your side as well? In other words, you aren't dense, just lazy?

The point of a debate isn't to argue the other persons side, it's to argue yours. In a formal essay it's common to show the oppositions views, but that's because they aren't there to show it themselves. And, funnily enough, this isn't the place for formal essays.

NO, in fact its to disregaurd the other side while saying you still respect a persons opinion. I have done this before in a lot of my post and am trying to do it more often. As for you bubbalo i see a ban in you immediate future.

2007-03-25 08:12:46

#366

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6976|Global Command

I think I'll have my Mod Slave change your forum title again, that be alright with you Bubs?

2007-03-25 08:12:57

#367

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7008

Disregard how?

2007-03-25 08:14:17

#368

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7008

ATG wrote:
I think I'll have my Mod Slave change your forum title again, that be alright with you Bubs?

Certainly. Have some fun with it!

2007-03-25 08:18:49

#369

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6976|Global Command

Bubbalo wrote:
ATG wrote:
I think I'll have my Mod Slave change your forum title again, that be alright with you Bubs?
Certainly. Have some fun with it!

Well, will you let it stay up for a few days.

2007-03-25 08:20:16

#370

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7008

I think I've lost all control over it, I've decided to just let the mods fight it out. Talk to them.

2007-03-25 08:23:43

#371

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6976|Global Command

So, you didn't ask the The Lizard be changed?

Oh, Bubs, your famous. View the topic in my sig.

Last edited by ATG (2007-03-25 08:24:32)

2007-03-25 08:24:29

#372

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7008

Wait, it was The Lizard? When?

2007-03-25 08:25:11

#373

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6976|Global Command

ATG wrote:
Oh, Bubs, your famous. View the topic in my sig.

It was up about 30 hours ago.

2007-03-25 08:28:55

#374

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7008

And I missed it.........that must have been before Ride the Snake......................

2007-03-26 06:32:08

#375

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|7163

Hypocracy ftl Bubbalo.

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

BF2S Forums Lest We Forget

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

ATG wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

golgoj4 wrote:

Pierre wrote:

deeznutz1245 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

ATG wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:

ATG wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

ATG wrote:

ATG wrote:

Board footer