rhetorical answer.l-aLeX-l wrote:
Besides it was hardly meant to be side-splitting was it? (Rhetorical Question)
Wow...okay. Way to make Americans look like idiots. I think I'm going to go now.CoronadoSEAL wrote:
rhetorical answer.l-aLeX-l wrote:
Besides it was hardly meant to be side-splitting was it? (Rhetorical Question)
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Second letter 's' ? hmm... that's not sounding right - that would mean the first letter has to be a vowel... and it means scrutinize?-=]NS[=-Eagle wrote:
The second letter may be "s" but no promisesScorpion0x17 wrote:
you got any of the letters?
'asks' is only thing I can think of.
Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2007-03-29 15:01:29)
Ummmm, I think your word crossing it may not be right. "espy" comes to mind, but that is not really that close to "scrutinize"-=]NS[=-Eagle wrote:
The second letter may be "s" but no promisesScorpion0x17 wrote:
you got any of the letters?
To the first one, 'test'.
To the second question, HOW MANY LETTERS DAMMIT!
To the second question, HOW MANY LETTERS DAMMIT!
If I were you i'd go to bed and re-read this thread in the morning when you're not so tiredSkorpy-chan wrote:
To the first one, 'test'.
To the second question, HOW MANY LETTERS DAMMIT!