BF2S Forums A woman president? PFFFF!!

ha

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

Ha. A woman president...

A. How embarrasing
B. A woman does not have the knowledge nor attitude it takes to run a country and make life threatening decisions
C. We would lose a LOT of respect from other countries. Not to mention all the places like Saudi Arabia that look down on women and have no respect for them.
D. Hilary Clinton is a communist. If i wanted the country run by a commie i would move to fuckin Russia.
E. Shes a woman... She doesn't have the balls it takes to go to war when neccesary. Her "Oh lets give everyone a hug and talk it over" attitude works in fantasy world, but not in the real world.

Those are my reasons.

ha...A women can be the ultimate, the ultimate BITCH, don't short sell them.. PS.. Hilary is useless

B. Margaret Thatcher.
D. Russian Federation != Soviet Union.

But please don't let her win.

Some professions are better to have a woman, and some for man

but for president, i agree with you in every way

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

Ok. Lets divide this a little bit further. Lets see if you agree with this:

The white male is best for a demanding and important job, because he is not partial to his own kind. Such as a woman, she might elect a female because "She believes more females should be in the job and they are getting a bad rap and your a sexist if you disagree!!"
And a black man might elect another black because he feels "there should be more blacks because they are getting a bad rap and your a racist if you disagree!!"

But, on the other hand the white male cannot say "I think there needs to be more white men in the administration......." because we all no theres no such thing as racism against whites or sexism against men... Its just non-existant.
Thats why theres a "United Negro College Fund" and not a "United White College Fund".... Sorry for getting off topic....
Discuss

Yes, I agaree to a small extent.  However, that should not prevent a woman or black person from taking office because there are much bigger issues I would look at over someone's race, such as their POLITICAL BELIEFS!

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

Ha. A woman president...
A. How embarrasing

Because..?

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

B. A woman does not have the knowledge nor attitude it takes to run a country and make life threatening decisions

And you know this how exactly? Neither do men.

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

C. We would lose a LOT of respect from other countries. Not to mention all the places like Saudi Arabia that look down on women and have no respect for them.

The President of my country is a woman. It was so embarrassing to the people, that they re-elected her.

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

D. Hilary Clinton is a communist. If i wanted the country run by a commie i would move to fuckin Russia.

..where you will find less communism than in the US.

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

E. Shes a woman... She doesn't have the balls it takes to go to war when neccesary. Her "Oh lets give everyone a hug and talk it over" attitude works in fantasy world, but not in the real world.

All women aren't like that. The ones that are in politics have had to endure a chauvinist atmosphere for so long that they usually have balls of steel. The one's who havent grown cojones don't run for presidency.

In my opinion, of course.

I don't hate Hillary Clinton because shes a woman, she might as well be a man with her attitude.

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

Ok. Lets divide this a little bit further. Lets see if you agree with this:

The white male is best for a demanding and important job, because he is not partial to his own kind. Such as a woman, she might elect a female because "She believes more females should be in the job and they are getting a bad rap and your a sexist if you disagree!!"
And a black man might elect another black because he feels "there should be more blacks because they are getting a bad rap and your a racist if you disagree!!"

But, on the other hand the white male cannot say "I think there needs to be more white men in the administration......." because we all no theres no such thing as racism against whites or sexism against men... Its just non-existant.
Thats why theres a "United Negro College Fund" and not a "United White College Fund".... Sorry for getting off topic....
Discuss

Jesus, this thread managed to be both stupid, and racist.
Nice going!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Merkel

Oh yeah, I will never take Germany seriously again.

Homeschtar wrote:

This thread is a joke, right? I thought the first post was a joke, but then when you went on to black people you seem to be serious. Please tell me I'm wrong.

i hope this is a joke thread. Neocons have no place in the new age.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaira-Vike_Freiberga

DonFck wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarja_Halonen

i thought she was gonna be hot...i was excited and then i saw it ewww

New Zealand has a female Prime Minister - has done since 1999. Sure she's ugly as sin, (sorry Helen but you bloody well are,) but she has done a pretty damn good job.
A while ago we had:
- A female PM
- A female Chief Justice
- A female Speaker of the House
- A female Governor General
- A female right and sovereign of New Zealand, (Queen Liz.)

The female takeover happened so gradually I didn't even notice.

Now the Govenor General has passed the role on so we have a male, (woo hoo!) Governor General by the name of Anand Satyanand. Nice bloke, a Fiji-Indian would you believe.

So by you're ideals, New Zealand is the mother of all fuckups, (possibly true, jokes aside of course,) yet so far we're not involved in any quagmire wars or getting threats from Saudi Arabian terrorists we trained in the art of war. Etcetera.

I honestly think America needs to wear a vagina for a while. It'd be good for you.