nukchebi0 wrote:
NooBesT[FiN] wrote:
nukchebi0 wrote:
I understand what this topic is about perfectly fine. You made a claim that you could prove any claim wrong. You have used sketchy, nit picking reasons to do so. You get mad when we call you on it. It isn't complicated.
Why do I waste my time? I don't want you feeling as though you actually did prove it wrong.
In light of this, I make another claim:
The title of the thread I am posting this post in is incorrect.
Maybe you should check the section again... And then go to the section that is one up from this one. There you can find the shit you want. Maybe you want to waste your time with this, but I don't. Say whatever you want about being proven wrong or not...
I have found that. It shows you not proving it wrong. If you don't want to continue with this, I don't either. I'll just sit here knowing that I was never proven wrong.
But you have been proven wrong, you’ve attempted to re-word your statement, and include the term "label." That is against the rules, once proven wrong.
You are attempting to say “you know what I meant, not what I said.”
You know as I know there is no such thing as “atmosphere” independent of the members that make up the collection. Just as there is no such thing as team independent of the members (individuals) that make up the team. Atmosphere is not a label that describes itself - you know this. It is not a thing itself - nor is it a container things can be
in. You know that the gases described by the
label - describe a region of spacetime that has specific qualities and has certain members as part of the collection. Atmosphere does not describe itself - atmosphere describes something else: gases, water vapor, etc. existing
in space-time, gravitationally attracted to the mass of the Earth, a collection (of gases/etc) not blown off into space (over a long period of time), due to shielding provided by the Earth’s Magnetic field.
We know as a region it is
in spacetime. We know it is label for a collection that has members, and is dependent upon other physical qualities. Oxygen is
in the collection (of gases) known by the label: “atmosphere” may very well be - what you meant - but it is not what you said.
As I said: . . . you are attempting to say “you know what I meant, not what I said.”Anyways (IMO) this thread is about seeing things from a different perspective and that you can have fun with that. But of course I could be wrong. As this statement is subject to being disproved.
Last edited by topal63 (2007-04-16 13:53:57)