I'm doing a lot of procrastination these days...
Taken directly from BF2s.com. Hope some of you find it interesting.
Taken directly from BF2s.com. Hope some of you find it interesting.
Last edited by Marinejuana (2007-04-18 16:25:05)
Pages: 1 2
Last edited by Marinejuana (2007-04-18 16:25:05)
give it another lookwanderlost wrote:
You idiots... That's 1 in 6,982,000 and 1 in 508,000. Spend less time on BF2s and more time in math class. This graph is in 1,000 unit increments. You aren't so unique - sorry.
Last edited by Marinejuana (2007-04-18 05:20:46)
You really that stupid? Read again,---and again if you have to.wanderlost wrote:
You idiots... That's 1 in 6,982,000 and 1 in 508,000. Spend less time on BF2s and more time in math class. This graph is in 1,000 unit increments. You aren't so unique - sorry.
ReeeeeetardcMD-RR wrote:
neeeeerds
haha smartass ^^wanderlost wrote:
You idiots... That's 1 in 6,982,000 and 1 in 508,000. Spend less time on BF2s and more time in math class. This graph is in 1,000 unit increments. You aren't so unique - sorry.
you a college boy ???wanderlost wrote:
You idiots... That's 1 in 6,982,000 and 1 in 508,000. Spend less time on BF2s and more time in math class. This graph is in 1,000 unit increments. You aren't so unique - sorry.
hahaha retard. you need to spend more time interpreting a graph and less time trying to prove how "smart" you are. points on the horizontal and players on the vertical. its saying 508 people with approximately 225000pts. the extra info on above the point indications are just showing how many people are in that range because it would be too hard reading the bar corresponding to that number.wanderlost wrote:
You idiots... That's 1 in 6,982,000 and 1 in 508,000. Spend less time on BF2s and more time in math class. This graph is in 1,000 unit increments. You aren't so unique - sorry.
roflwanderlost wrote:
You idiots... That's 1 in 6,982,000 and 1 in 508,000. Spend less time on BF2s and more time in math class. This graph is in 1,000 unit increments. You aren't so unique - sorry.
JET_G raidensen wrote:
1 in 6982..............i feel so unique!
However realize that each bar is the number of people that have between a and b number of points. So your percentile is not calculated by doing 100(1-(1/508)). As in, you are one out of 508 people in that category, it doesnt mean youre ranked 508th. You probably realized this but I'm just clarifying.gene_pool wrote:
1 of 508, FTW
Because people want that percentile perspective (which isnt hard to calculate based on your rankings page here) I added maximum percentiles for most point categories in red.De_Jappe wrote:
Interesting! However, it's not easy to see in which Top-how-many you are now. maybe another curve/probability table?
Last edited by Marinejuana (2007-04-18 16:48:05)
Failwanderlost wrote:
You idiots... That's 1 in 6,982,000 and 1 in 508,000. Spend less time on BF2s and more time in math class. This graph is in 1,000 unit increments. You aren't so unique - sorry.
roflwanderlost wrote:
You idiots... That's 1 in 6,982,000 and 1 in 508,000. Spend less time on BF2s and more time in math class. This graph is in 1,000 unit increments. You aren't so unique - sorry.
If I understand the graphic right, instead of saying one of 6982, you could say you are in the top 5%. That sounds much better. Of course, it has been a while since I was at school, and I could be setting myself up to look like wanderlost.JET_G raidensen wrote:
1 in 6982..............i feel so unique!
lol dude I would never post again in these forums if I were you. I'll never forget this. lol over 7 million people playing BF2. roflwanderlost wrote:
You idiots... That's 1 in 6,982,000 and 1 in 508,000. Spend less time on BF2s and more time in math class. This graph is in 1,000 unit increments. You aren't so unique - sorry.
you,my good sir,are a douchebag.it makes me sad that you're a fellow Iowan.it's no wonder why everyone thinks we're a bunch of dumbass farmers.wanderlost wrote:
You idiots... That's 1 in 6,982,000 and 1 in 508,000. Spend less time on BF2s and more time in math class. This graph is in 1,000 unit increments. You aren't so unique - sorry.
Check out the edit. 6982 is the number of people that have between 100k and 125k points. Its not the total number of people that have more than 100k points. I did this so you could see how many people you are passing as you go from one point increment to another. I was curious if there were gaps in the leaderboard. I was thinking that maybe there are more colonels than lt. colonels, for example, because many people reach the colonel as a final goal. I was wrong though, the gaps dont really become dramatic until u get to around 250-300k points.TuataraDude wrote:
If I understand the graphic right, instead of saying one of 6982, you could say you are in the top 5%. That sounds much better. Of course, it has been a while since I was at school, and I could be setting myself up to look like wanderlost.JET_G raidensen wrote:
1 in 6982..............i feel so unique!
Pages: 1 2