War on terror?

2007-04-20 02:00:03

#1

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6740|Éire

"A 79-year-old anti-Castro Cuban exile and former C.I.A. operative linked to the bombing of a Cuban airliner was released on bail yesterday and immediately returned to Miami to await trial on immigration fraud charges."

I can already hear usmarine typing 'yawn' but let's just look at this for a moment ...The US claims to be fighting a 'war on terror' and yet this TERRORIST has just been released on bail to await trial on immigration charges ...WTF!? Shouldn't this butcher be on trial for the people he killed in the bombing of that Cuban airliner and not immigration charges. How would the US feel if another country had a 9/11 bomber in it and that country refused to extradite the bomber back to the US for trial and to add insult to injury tried to get the guy done on immigration charges as though that was all he was guilty of?

Is it only specific parts of 'terror' the US are at war with?

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/20/world … mp;emc=rss
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? … cleId=5404
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Posada_Carriles

Last edited by Braddock (2007-04-20 02:01:26)

2007-04-20 02:13:20

#2

Sanjaya: Banned; +40|6677

Braddock wrote:
"A 79-year-old anti-Castro Cuban exile and former C.I.A. operative linked to the bombing of a Cuban airliner was released on bail yesterday and immediately returned to Miami to await trial on immigration fraud charges."

I can already hear usmarine typing 'yawn' but let's just look at this for a moment ...The US claims to be fighting a 'war on terror' and yet this TERRORIST has just been released on bail to await trial on immigration charges ...WTF!? Shouldn't this butcher be on trial for the people he killed in the bombing of that Cuban airliner and not immigration charges. How would the US feel if another country had a 9/11 bomber in it and that country refused to extradite the bomber back to the US for trial and to add insult to injury tried to get the guy done on immigration charges as though that was all he was guilty of?

Is it only specific parts of 'terror' the US are at war with?

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/20/world … mp;emc=rss
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? … cleId=5404
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Posada_Carriles

The US has long supported Cuban anti-Castro terrorists. It's nothing new.

2007-04-20 02:17:38

#3

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|7005

He was trained by the CIA to carry out the airliner hit. When I was in Cuba I saw Carriles' face all over the daily news every day and on billboards - he is the most hated figure in the whole of Cuba. This is just another example of US hypocrisy and lack of principles. Ironically if he was Muslim they'd probably have no trouble extraditing him to Cuba - to Guantanamo Bay that is!

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-04-20 02:18:21)

2007-04-20 02:19:07

#4

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6740|Éire

Sanjaya wrote:
The US has long supported Cuban anti-Castro terrorists. It's nothing new.

I know, that's my point ...they are hypocrites. It just annoys me that the US attempts to insult the world's intelligence by claiming to be this incredible force for good when they are every bit as active in terrorism as the countries they accuse. They are equally as bad as all the countries that they claim are part of the 'axis of evil'.

Last edited by Braddock (2007-04-20 02:20:37)

2007-04-20 03:10:05

#5

mcminty: Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.; +879|7171|Sydney, Australia

He is in the middle of court proceedings for the court case, but was released on bail while he awaits the next stage of the trial. The other immigration thing is a totally different case...

Hard?

Mcminty.

2007-04-20 03:24:04

#6

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|7005

mcminty wrote:
He is in the middle of court proceedings for the court case, but was released on bail while he awaits the next stage of the trial. The other immigration thing is a totally different case...

Hard?

Mcminty.

You don't release self-confessed terrorists on bail McMinty. I don't think they're trying him for any acts of terrorism either.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-04-20 03:55:25)

2007-04-20 03:26:13

#7

Mason4Assassin444: retired; +552|7112|USA

War on terror, war on drugs, war on communism. Funny none if this shit ends, it justs makes a small amount of people in the US rich. Next up, War on Liberals.

2007-04-20 03:32:02

#8

lowing: Banned; +1,662|7101|USA

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
War on terror, war on drugs, war on communism. Funny none if this shit ends, it justs makes a small amount of people in the US rich. Next up, War on Liberals.

That would be easy to win, we can just walk up to them and shoot them in the ass while they have their heads in the sand.

2007-04-20 03:35:33

#9

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6740|Éire

lowing wrote:
That would be easy to win, we can just walk up to them and shoot them in the ass while they have their heads in the sand.

I get the impression you've only ever seen pictures of liberals in books.

2007-04-20 03:54:27

#10

Mason4Assassin444: retired; +552|7112|USA

lowing wrote:
Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
War on terror, war on drugs, war on communism. Funny none if this shit ends, it justs makes a small amount of people in the US rich. Next up, War on Liberals.
That would be easy to win, we can just walk up to them and shoot them in the ass while they have their heads in the sand.

So witty.

2007-04-20 04:32:37

#11

lowing: Banned; +1,662|7101|USA

Braddock wrote:
lowing wrote:
That would be easy to win, we can just walk up to them and shoot them in the ass while they have their heads in the sand.
I get the impression you've only ever seen pictures of liberals in books.

yeah, like Cat in the Hat, and Peter Pan, as well as many other fantasies.

2007-04-20 06:04:25

#12

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7011

Braddock wrote:
lowing wrote:
That would be easy to win, we can just walk up to them and shoot them in the ass while they have their heads in the sand.
I get the impression you've only ever seen pictures of liberals in books.

Yeah, in reality we all have our heads up our asses.

2007-04-20 06:40:35

#13

m3thod: All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz; +2,197|7121|UK

lowing wrote:
Braddock wrote:
lowing wrote:
That would be easy to win, we can just walk up to them and shoot them in the ass while they have their heads in the sand.
I get the impression you've only ever seen pictures of liberals in books.
yeah, like Cat in the Hat, and Peter Pan, as well as many other fantasies.

Don't forget Penthouse.

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.

2007-04-20 18:36:07

#14

lowing: Banned; +1,662|7101|USA

Bubbalo wrote:
Braddock wrote:
lowing wrote:
That would be easy to win, we can just walk up to them and shoot them in the ass while they have their heads in the sand.
I get the impression you've only ever seen pictures of liberals in books.
Yeah, in reality we all have our heads up our asses.

In reality, you sure do.

2007-04-20 18:46:58

#15

m3thod: All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz; +2,197|7121|UK

lowing wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
Braddock wrote:

I get the impression you've only ever seen pictures of liberals in books.
Yeah, in reality we all have our heads up our asses.
In reality, you sure do.

We Lowing! WE.

Anyway, you remind me of ferocious Ness.

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.

2007-04-21 07:08:53

#16

lowing: Banned; +1,662|7101|USA

m3thod wrote:
lowing wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:

Yeah, in reality we all have our heads up our asses.
In reality, you sure do.
We Lowing! WE.

Anyway, you remind me of ferocious Ness.

great!!, whateverthehell that is.

2007-04-21 15:49:35

#17

m3thod: All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz; +2,197|7121|UK

lowing wrote:
m3thod wrote:
lowing wrote:
In reality, you sure do.
We Lowing! WE.

Anyway, you remind me of ferocious Ness.
great!!, whateverthehell that is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxjqMZd-BVE

I loved this shit when i was a kid

Last edited by m3thod (2007-04-21 15:50:06)

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.

2007-04-21 17:46:40

#18

lowing: Banned; +1,662|7101|USA

m3thod wrote:
lowing wrote:
m3thod wrote:

We Lowing! WE.

Anyway, you remind me of ferocious Ness.
great!!, whateverthehell that is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxjqMZd-BVE

I loved this shit when i was a kid

oooooooooooooooooooooooooook. lol

2007-04-21 18:07:13

#19

san4: The Mas; +311|7138|NYC, a place to live

Braddock wrote:
I know, that's my point ...they are hypocrites. It just annoys me that the US attempts to insult the world's intelligence by claiming to be this incredible force for good when they are every bit as active in terrorism as the countries they accuse. They are equally as bad as all the countries that they claim are part of the 'axis of evil'.

You can't seriously say the U.S. is as bad as North Korea?

Wikipedia wrote:
International human rights organizations Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, among others, accuse North Korea of having one of the worst human rights records of any nation, with a severe restriction on political and economic freedoms. North Korean defectors have testified as to the existence of detention camps with an estimated 150,000 to 200,000 inmates, and have reported torture, starvation, rape, murder and forced labor.

Or as bad as Holocaust-denying Iran, which gives money to suicide bombers (Hamas) and is ruled by religious authorities?

2007-04-21 18:48:47

#20

Scorpion0x17: can detect anyone's visible post count...; +691|7216|Cambridge (UK)

m3thod wrote:
lowing wrote:
m3thod wrote:

We Lowing! WE.

Anyway, you remind me of ferocious Ness.
great!!, whateverthehell that is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxjqMZd-BVE

I loved this shit when i was a kid

Thankyou m3thod. For putting a smile on my face. The Family Ness rocks!

2007-04-22 15:51:07

#21

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6740|Éire

san4 wrote:
Braddock wrote:
I know, that's my point ...they are hypocrites. It just annoys me that the US attempts to insult the world's intelligence by claiming to be this incredible force for good when they are every bit as active in terrorism as the countries they accuse. They are equally as bad as all the countries that they claim are part of the 'axis of evil'.
You can't seriously say the U.S. is as bad as North Korea?
Wikipedia wrote:
International human rights organizations Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, among others, accuse North Korea of having one of the worst human rights records of any nation, with a severe restriction on political and economic freedoms. North Korean defectors have testified as to the existence of detention camps with an estimated 150,000 to 200,000 inmates, and have reported torture, starvation, rape, murder and forced labor.
Or as bad as Holocaust-denying Iran, which gives money to suicide bombers (Hamas) and is ruled by religious authorities?

I won't bother trying to defend North Korea because A: we don't get nearly enough insight into that country's situation to make an informed judgement and B: I actually think Kim Jong Il is a muppet and probably is a tyrant who is not worth defending.

But...

Iran treated those British captives a hell of a lot nicer than the Americans treat the captives at Guantanamo bay, who are treated with no regard to Internationally accepted human rights, are not given a fair legal process and IF they ever do get released have to sign contracts agreeing never to accuse the US of abuse, torture and maltreatment.

By the way Iran did not deny the holocaust Ahmedinijad did. Should we presume every word that comes out of George Bush's mouth reflects the exact thoughts of the American people themselves as a whole (for the American people's sake I sure hope not). I believe Ahmedinijad took a lot of flak for saying that in his own country.

PS ...giving money to suicide bombers you say?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl … rsity.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? … cleId=4931
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh … iran25.xml

Last edited by Braddock (2007-04-22 15:51:46)

2007-04-22 15:53:29

#22

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|7094

has it not occured to people that Iran snatching, holding and then releasing the hostages was part of a huge propaganda campaign that succeeded wholeheartedly.

Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2007-04-22 15:56:37)

2007-04-22 16:16:59

#23

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi: Why walk when you can dance?; +77|7037|sWEEDen

the war on terror aimed at american interests ....is the right thing too call it.

2007-04-22 16:19:34

#24

Scorpion0x17: can detect anyone's visible post count...; +691|7216|Cambridge (UK)

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
has it not occured to people that Iran snatching, holding and then releasing the hostages was part of a huge propaganda campaign that succeeded wholeheartedly.

No, it had not.

/sarcasm.

2007-04-22 23:50:31

#25

=OBS= EstebanRey: Member; +256|7000|Oxford, England, UK, EU, Earth

I'm surprised no one's mentioned Orlando Bosch yet....

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,1 … 13,00.html

BF2S Forums War on terror?

Braddock wrote:

Sanjaya wrote:

mcminty wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

lowing wrote:

lowing wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Braddock wrote:

lowing wrote:

Braddock wrote:

lowing wrote:

lowing wrote:

Braddock wrote:

lowing wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Braddock wrote:

lowing wrote:

lowing wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Braddock wrote:

m3thod wrote:

lowing wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

lowing wrote:

m3thod wrote:

lowing wrote:

m3thod wrote:

lowing wrote:

m3thod wrote:

Braddock wrote:

Wikipedia wrote:

m3thod wrote:

lowing wrote:

m3thod wrote:

san4 wrote:

Braddock wrote:

Wikipedia wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Board footer