stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|7142|California

we all know that the new patch is bringing the officer class to the rank scale. do you think that it will/should have requrements for these new positions? i.e. 20 hours of commander, 50 hours squad leader to reach captain, per se. do you think that is fair or unreasonable?
Wildbill100372
Member
+1|7106
I think it would make sense that officers should have either minimum squad leader or commander times.
PFCStenzel
Check your AA alarm...
+82|7216|Idaho, USA / Age 30
Good Idea there Stryyker!!!!
FriiginChomper
Member
+41|7123
i read on this one page, i got the link from a forum here but i dont remember which one, but it said there was going to be ranks up to general? anyone heard otherwise or how much points it will take to reach these new ranks?
Ty
Mass Media Casualty
+2,398|7196|Noizyland

Agreed. I wonder what the requirements for the ultimate rank of 'General' would be. I bet it's going to be another one person gets it at a time type thing.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
TehMyke
8======D
+343|7131
I hope they have requirments like maybe... all expert badges or something for this... all blah blah blah for that...

(like you need all basics for first serg etc...)

so all the medic whores that play nothing but medic (sorry blazin ) will cry that they spent all that time doing nothing.

Last edited by TehMyke (2006-01-19 22:36:48)

» You guys are all old and wrinkly now, GG... | Steam | teHmyke.com | YouTube
stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|7142|California

its all the Field Officer ranks

examples, 1st Lt. 2nt. Captain, Major, General, and all inbetween

http://www.military-quotes.com/ranks/ma … signia.htm

Last edited by stryyker (2006-01-19 22:37:13)

A.Aho
Member
+0|7111|Finland
If I remember right, when BF2SF was born, they dropped the score limits for the ranks...Do I remember right?
I wonder are they gonna do that again?
notorious
Nay vee, bay bee.
+1,396|7169|The United Center

A.Aho wrote:

If I remember right, when BF2SF was born, they dropped the score limits for the ranks...Do I remember right?
I wonder are they gonna do that again?
they did that before SF.  the requirements were lowered with the 1.03 patch.

stryyker, i really like that idea.  i think it would separate those who are good all-around players from those who only play in armor and jets or those who only play as medic or commander.  although you can medic whore it up on karkand and get a ton of points, theres no way you can pad your way to 100 hours for each kit.
F.Rabshaw
Member
+37|7104

ThomasMorgan wrote:

theres no way you can pad your way to 100 hours for each kit.
Its called being idle, dude.

Last edited by F.Rabshaw (2006-01-20 12:20:53)

divided
Clear!
+3|7195
I would be very surprised if the enormous gap inbetween sergeant major and 2nd lt. wasn't narrowed.  Or maybe put a warrant officer rank in between them.
SAS-Lynx
Scottish Moderator!!!
+13|7198|Scotland!!!
i think thats a great idea stryyker! and quite a possible way they might do that because cmon, lots of new ranks...  more then 200,000 points    thats insane to go higher than that (imo), so the "hours as" an "required awards" is a great way forward
Raxor
Enemy Boat Spotted
+17|7266|United Kingdom
expert everything for general rank
should have them by the time you get that many points anwyay
VeNg3nCe^
¦Tactics Øver Principles¦
+314|7127|Antarctica
hmmm, the only problem with this would be, everyone in the top ten(much less the top 50) has over 700 hrs played, so the time req's would have to be huge, like 300 or 400 hrs as each position for it to even effect most ppl.  I also dislike the idea because, the medals have time req's on them, I don't think the ranks should.  I do like the idea of making the ranks have a large point requirement, maybe 500,000 or 750,000 for the top rank or something.  It would be stupid to see dozens of generals running around on Karkand.


I would personally like the ranks to go like this:

50,000 sgt major
80,000 2nd Lt
160,000 1st Lt
250,000 captain
300,000 major
350,000 Lt. Col.
400,000 Colonel
450,000 Brig. Gen (1 star)
500,000 Maj. Gen (2 star)
550,000 Lt. Gen (3 star)
650,000 4 star general, and you should need so many expert badges.



although you can medic whore it up on karkand and get a ton of points, theres no way you can pad your way to 100 hours for each kit.
what?

Last edited by VeNg3nCe^ (2006-01-20 13:02:05)

Teckademics
Member
+1|7147|Savannah GA
hell no put them lower then that. think about the people who have a life and want unlocks.
SAS-Lynx
Scottish Moderator!!!
+13|7198|Scotland!!!

VeNg3nCe^ wrote:

I would personally like the ranks to go like this:

50,000 sgt major
80,000 2nd Lt
160,000 1st Lt
250,000 captain
300,000 major
350,000 Lt. Col.
400,000 Colonel
450,000 Brig. Gen (1 star)
500,000 Maj. Gen (2 star)
550,000 Lt. Gen (3 star)
650,000 4 star general, and you should need so many expert badges
650,000   some of us (that like to rank up) have more to life than play that amount of time to get 650,000
Kobrakai
Weirdo
+152|7210|England

SAS-Lynx wrote:

VeNg3nCe^ wrote:

I would personally like the ranks to go like this:

50,000 sgt major
80,000 2nd Lt
160,000 1st Lt
250,000 captain
300,000 major
350,000 Lt. Col.
400,000 Colonel
450,000 Brig. Gen (1 star)
500,000 Maj. Gen (2 star)
550,000 Lt. Gen (3 star)
650,000 4 star general, and you should need so many expert badges
650,000   some of us (that like to rank up) have more to life than play that amount of time to get 650,000
That’s why they lowered the non-officer ranks for you. Now the higer score players need something to work towards. I agree with VeNg3nCe on those numbers.
SAS-Lynx
Scottish Moderator!!!
+13|7198|Scotland!!!
yeah but people that dont play all there days still wana rank up now and then, which is why the time requirement an required awards is a good idea it will also make the amazing "top 10" that everyone is so botherd about more accurate because you will have to have the skill to get the awards rather than just points
Lib-Sl@yer
Member
+32|7135|Wherever the F**k i feel like
I will just wait till the summer then non-stop bf2
slidero
points
+31|7198

SAS-Lynx wrote:

yeah but people that dont play all there days still wana rank up now and then, which is why the time requirement an required awards is a good idea it will also make the amazing "top 10" that everyone is so botherd about more accurate because you will have to have the skill to get the awards rather than just points
I can't see why you want pointless ranks if you don't want to spend a lot of time getting them.  You're a "casual player" and already have all the unlocks, why do you care?  These new ranks that require a ton of points are just for the people with no lives
SAS-Lynx
Scottish Moderator!!!
+13|7198|Scotland!!!
lol i gues your right, i like to be a rank i like (dont ask y ) an i like gunny sgt (my current rank) an first sergeant. the only new rank coming i gues i would like would be major or maby captain. officer ranks isnt my thing but getting priority for commander is lol
dragon102
Member
+0|7117|Elyria OH
I think they should be selected for ranks above captain and done by performance not by points.
stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|7142|California

i got some info from my cousin in EA canada, she didnt say much, but that new ranks were added, and requirements lowered, so who knows?
(BRU)Timothy
Member
+5|7109|Pennsylvania - Hershey!
I Just became a Sargent Major.  I would'nt mind if they would add more ranks between that and 2nd leutenet. Be nice to rank up again so quickly!  When the 1.03 patch came out, I gained three ranks instantly, it was great!
Paladus902
The Last Man Standing
+1|7208
Stryyker that was an excellent idea!  While it would be nice to lower them, it would be nice for them to include certain attainment factors other than badges, like what has been said about time spent as a certain kit?  That would be nice to see.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard