Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6802
Instead, Reality Game shows for the candidates.

There could be a series of contests or events that highlight their skills or lack thereof

Picture

Bush reading Shakespeare aloud
Hillary saying “Bush keeps fooling me”  during poker games
Obama trying to stay out of the sun.

Create your own examples
Cerpin_Taxt
Member
+155|6650
Bush trying to stay out of the sun.
Hillary reading Shakespeare aloud
Obama saying “Bush keeps fooling me” during poker games
Skorpy-chan
Member
+127|6792|Twyford, UK
How is this debate OR serious talk?
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6852|North Carolina
We could always use Canada's system.  Allow only federal funding for campaigns, and make sure all the major candidates receive the same amount of money.

This way, you can't buy an election.
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|7015|Mountains of NC

Turquoise wrote:

We could always use Canada's system.  Allow only federal funding for campaigns, and make sure all the major candidates receive the same amount of money.

This way, you can't buy an election.
I like this ^^^^^^^^^^ to a point, I don't want my federal money pumping into some campaign I don't support - I do like the point of candiates and same amount of money but maybe do what they do now by raising it and have set max amount they are allowed to have and then someone not associated with the candidate to regulate where the money goes (so we don't have a certain candidate spending that money on $400 haircuts)
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard