I guess that is what makes people different. I for one would not give a fuck what he had and would do what I could. Chances are just because he has one, doesn't mean he knows how to use it when someone is attacking him.SineNomine wrote:
Another thing: Maybe this people didn't help because they feared the probability of the robber having a gun. Also a typical American problem.
Last edited by usmarine2005 (2007-05-14 13:34:02)
That would actually be about the only reason for me not to step in. This might sound racist, but I can imagine if people see a black ghetto type dude trying to steal a car, they assume he's also got a gun.SineNomine wrote:
Another thing: Maybe this people didn't help because they feared the probability of the robber having a gun. Also a typical American problem.
Nothing wrong with ghetto dudes.LaidBackNinja wrote:
That would actually be about the only reason for me not to step in. This might sound racist, but I can imagine if people see a black ghetto type dude trying to steal a car, they assume he's also got a gun.SineNomine wrote:
Another thing: Maybe this people didn't help because they feared the probability of the robber having a gun. Also a typical American problem.
Why was the taxi driver lifting her out if there were ambulance people there?Rickard.Jarl- wrote:
I remember a car accident here, an taxi driver saw a car wich had crashed into a wall and he helped the girl inside the car into his taxi. Then the ambulance came and saw that she had someting wrong in her neck. They sawed of the roof on the cab and lifted her out, then it was a biiig trial if the taxi driver had to pay the damages on his car himself. Actualy he didnt get to pay it himself but, WHY EVEN TRY IT? Punish someone for helping another? What a world.
Trying to help a wounded person without having a First Aid certificate is a punishable offense here. The law is like: "If you don't know what you're doing, don't try to fucking help. Just stand there and watch while the victim bleeds to death, or something."Rickard.Jarl- wrote:
I remember a car accident here, an taxi driver saw a car wich had crashed into a wall and he helped the girl inside the car into his taxi. Then the ambulance came and saw that she had someting wrong in her neck. They sawed of the roof on the cab and lifted her out, then it was a biiig trial if the taxi driver had to pay the damages on his car himself. Actualy he didnt get to pay it himself but, WHY EVEN TRY IT? Punish someone for helping another? What a world.
Actually we have a law called the good samaritan law. It says that if you administer aid to someone and that person ends up dead or injured you can't be at fault unless you did something stupid like try to perform a tracheotomy with a pocket knife and pen.LaidBackNinja wrote:
Trying to help a wounded person without having a First Aid certificate is a punishable offense here. The law is like: "If you don't know what you're doing, don't try to fucking help. Just stand there and watch while the victim bleeds to death, or something."Rickard.Jarl- wrote:
I remember a car accident here, an taxi driver saw a car wich had crashed into a wall and he helped the girl inside the car into his taxi. Then the ambulance came and saw that she had someting wrong in her neck. They sawed of the roof on the cab and lifted her out, then it was a biiig trial if the taxi driver had to pay the damages on his car himself. Actualy he didnt get to pay it himself but, WHY EVEN TRY IT? Punish someone for helping another? What a world.
Actually, I don't know if it's a criminal offense, but if you try to help someone and they die because you didn't do the exact right thing, you can go to jail for manslaughter.
Last edited by rawls2 (2007-05-14 14:02:41)
A church outing?, you dont live around here, and its not a church outing, its a public carnival, exactly what you said, you dont have to go to the church to go to the carnival....ThomasMorgan wrote:
You can't honestly compare a church outing with a public carnival.HURLEY wrote:
I'm sorry, but tell me if this makes me a racist.
Ive noticed that black people are definitely more violent, and just like what fancy posted, is what mlk did, backfiring?
Last weekend we had the Valley of flowers, which is a pretty big carnival, and there was probably 2 fights and another kid that i just met this weekend, got hit in the face with a baseball bat by some black person.
While the next week we have a Parish picnic at my church(Basically a carnival), with almost just as many people, minus the black people, and guess what, no fights.
I'm not saying that I hate all black people, because I play basketball and I've got to know some of them and they're really kool, but it just seems to me that they have no respect for anyone they don't know.
...oh wait, you just tried to.
Last edited by HURLEY (2007-05-14 14:55:37)
Pot heads don't start fights for a start, and why are there no black people there? Does your church lynch black people or something?HURLEY wrote:
A church outing?, you dont live around here, and its not a church outing, its a public carnival, exactly what you said, you dont have to go to the church to go to the carnival....ThomasMorgan wrote:
You can't honestly compare a church outing with a public carnival.HURLEY wrote:
I'm sorry, but tell me if this makes me a racist.
Ive noticed that black people are definitely more violent, and just like what fancy posted, is what mlk did, backfiring?
Last weekend we had the Valley of flowers, which is a pretty big carnival, and there was probably 2 fights and another kid that i just met this weekend, got hit in the face with a baseball bat by some black person.
While the next week we have a Parish picnic at my church(Basically a carnival), with almost just as many people, minus the black people, and guess what, no fights.
I'm not saying that I hate all black people, because I play basketball and I've got to know some of them and they're really kool, but it just seems to me that they have no respect for anyone they don't know.
...oh wait, you just tried to.
its the exact same thing, same rides, same games, theres the same pot heads there
Just no black people.
I suggest you watch the full video version. It shows 4 or 5 people standing around a car RIGHT NEXT to him.Vernedead wrote:
also mabye because a man being punched in the face repeatedly isn't the best source on what everybody else is doing, its possible he was distracted.
Last edited by usmarine2005 (2007-05-14 15:03:32)
maybeghettoperson wrote:
Pot heads don't start fights for a start, and why are there no black people there? Does your church lynch black people or something?HURLEY wrote:
A church outing?, you dont live around here, and its not a church outing, its a public carnival, exactly what you said, you dont have to go to the church to go to the carnival....ThomasMorgan wrote:
You can't honestly compare a church outing with a public carnival.
...oh wait, you just tried to.
its the exact same thing, same rides, same games, theres the same pot heads there
Just no black people.
Last edited by HURLEY (2007-05-16 15:27:45)
so jerry and the gang went to prison for nothing?Snake wrote:
If it was on camera, the people who were to attack the theif would have been sued themselves. Thats the brilliance of the justice system - even the criminals can get their would-be preventers put behind bars.Vilham wrote:
what a 91 year old was driving???
as to the OP, they probably didnt want to be sued by the robber or they were pussy's.
The entire system is totally fucked up.
People like him and the one in this thread deserve the worst, most painful and degrading death possbile IMO.DooM wrote:
http://www.yourdailymedia.com/media/1126537580
Theres another one, I don't care if that idiot is broke or whatever, that is uncalled for, should be shot tbh.
He wouldn't win in FL. Shit, I may have been able to shoot him down here.Snake wrote:
If it was on camera, the people who were to attack the theif would have been sued themselves. Thats the brilliance of the justice system - even the criminals can get their would-be preventers put behind bars.Vilham wrote:
what a 91 year old was driving???
as to the OP, they probably didnt want to be sued by the robber or they were pussy's.
The entire system is totally fucked up.
Well hopefully this piece of useless shit gets shipped to Florida.DBBrinson1 wrote:
He wouldn't win in FL. Shit, I may have been able to shoot him down here.Snake wrote:
If it was on camera, the people who were to attack the theif would have been sued themselves. Thats the brilliance of the justice system - even the criminals can get their would-be preventers put behind bars.Vilham wrote:
what a 91 year old was driving???
as to the OP, they probably didnt want to be sued by the robber or they were pussy's.
The entire system is totally fucked up.
http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0306/
We do...sort of. It all depends on the judge in most cases. Unfortunately it comes down to a personal viewpoint, not the law.Gawwad wrote:
Atleast in Finland the legal system can annul charges, if the 'criminal' act was done to prevent a bigger vrime from happening. ie. you could have beaten that guy who stole the car in Finland and would have gotten thanks instead of going to prison.
Don't you have this kind of system in the USA?