goatsedont_be_ss wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback
@ Mostly TOP, why do you always post and derail our topics? I cant remember a sniper/wookie ever derailing your thread.
Why can't we just get along.

goatsedont_be_ss wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback
@ Mostly TOP, why do you always post and derail our topics? I cant remember a sniper/wookie ever derailing your thread.
Why can't we just get along.
bottleguyMarlboroman82 wrote:
goatsedont_be_ss wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback
@ Mostly TOP, why do you always post and derail our topics? I cant remember a sniper/wookie ever derailing your thread.
Why can't we just get along.
dont_be_ss wrote:
@ Mostly TOP, why do you always post and derail our topics? I cant remember a sniper/wookie ever derailing your thread.
Why can't we just get along.
Last edited by ']['error (2007-05-16 11:23:16)
Stryyker, me, terror, koala, and oakleaves are the only members of TOP that you know about that are under 20, and the youngest of us is 16, there are no "pre-pubescent" kids in here with nasal voices, because with our recruiting system they wouldn't last 30 seconds in our teamspeak.R0lyP0ly wrote:
.....and taking their pre-pubescent angers out..........Jameseyy wrote:
Jemme101 wrote:
They cannt, TOP stands for Talentless Overrated Players (except Patton), enuff said imo.
']['error wrote:
http://images.apple.com/moviesxml/s/wei … 172155.jpgdont_be_ss wrote:
@ Mostly TOP, why do you always post and derail our topics? I cant remember a sniper/wookie ever derailing your thread.
Why can't we just get along.
I have no beef with you. At all. Lets keep it that way ya?ssonrats wrote:
Can all the TOP guys leave the thread so we can get some mature, constructive responses.
I thought you knew better Stryykker, looks like you're like the rest of em' eh?
I already put in my 2 cents about the movie. My flaming was more directed at the nutjob that made the comparison a few posts above.dont_be_ss wrote:
Why can't we just get along.
Cool. I appreciate you posting this response stryyker. We are all here to have fun and not go off on tangents with eachother.stryyker wrote:
I have no beef with you. At all. Lets keep it that way ya?ssonrats wrote:
Can all the TOP guys leave the thread so we can get some mature, constructive responses.
I thought you knew better Stryykker, looks like you're like the rest of em' eh?I already put in my 2 cents about the movie. My flaming was more directed at the nutjob that made the comparison a few posts above.dont_be_ss wrote:
Why can't we just get along.
My argument in your thread. I apologize for that, but desperate times call for desperate measures.
i got da fanzTushers wrote:
top for the most part are good peeps i aint putting out who i dislike cuz then this would be a big hate war, and i wub my stryyker and patton
but besides that marb man ur a dick oh thanks for the comments
He got banned for typing like a moron.Marlboroman82 wrote:
Ok, hey hows that application for |TOP| coming along?
Tushers likes M's sig.OakLeaves wrote:
...whats going on here then.
LOLAudioAtomica wrote:
Wow at this whole thread.
Personally I thought that movie was lame. There were some good parts, but only a few. There wasn't anything the BF2 community hasn't seen before. The most impressive thing, was the editing, (dontbess?) +1 to you. And the music was pretty awful.
5/10
your name is "ClaymoreEverythingLikeaFag"???Chillin&killin wrote:
i never did have any problems with |TOP| so why do you have problems with us.
its not like i dont understand why you say snipers are useless, but when you consider the "skill" of a player defines how good a certain kit is then dont go around sturring it up.
after all the is a game and my name is what i do in the game.