Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6995|San Diego, CA, USA
In the United States there is alot of the 'Cowboy' mentality.  We should not care what other people think, even if we have to go it alone.  (No need to for any examples )

There is also popular opinion that believes our reputation in the World stage is more vital own selfish national interests.


So I ask, what would the United States need to do to gain popularity on the 'World Stage'?

Would what you suggest violate any principals United States citizens value?  If so why should they go against their principals?

What would the United States gain?

Would this make the World safer?

Last edited by Harmor (2007-05-19 19:35:33)

Mr.Dude2
Member
+13|6771| Bay Area Calif. USA
Make Ricky Martin a US citizen 
Havok
Nymphomaniac Treatment Specialist
+302|7122|Florida, United States

Harmor wrote:

So I ask, what would the United States need to do to gain popularity on the 'World Stage'?
Isolationism.  Let them (the world) forget about us while we rebuild our economy and attack our tremendous debt.

Harmor wrote:

Would what you suggest violate any principals United States citizens value?  If so why should they go against their principals?
I don't think it would.  I don't know of any principles that my countrymen hold that would restrict the urge to become great again.

Harmor wrote:

What would the United States gain?
Respect.  Trust.

Harmor wrote:

Would this make the World safer?
I don't think the world is more dangerous/safer regardless of what the US does.  In recent events, our efforts to preserve peace in our nation has created chaos in other nations, so saying we're the world police doesn't apply anymore.

Last edited by Havok (2007-05-19 19:43:13)

SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|7015|Mountains of NC

Mr.Dude2 wrote:

Make Ricky Martin a US citizen 
https://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w253/SEREMAKER/ric.jpg
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
Havok
Nymphomaniac Treatment Specialist
+302|7122|Florida, United States

SEREMAKER wrote:

Mr.Dude2 wrote:

Make Ricky Martin a US citizen 
http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w253 … ER/ric.jpg
Read the bottom line of the picture...  THIEF! [/sarcasm]

Last edited by Havok (2007-05-19 20:00:51)

Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6915
Intelligent answer: Pull out of Iraq, stop military support of Israel.

doctastrangelove1964 answer: ask politely.
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|7015|Mountains of NC

Havok wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

Mr.Dude2 wrote:

Make Ricky Martin a US citizen 
http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w253 … ER/ric.jpg
Read the bottom line of the picture...  THIEF! [/sarcasm]
he owns me too
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+796|7132|United States of America
I'd say that finding bin Laden would be a big PR boost for the current administration and would show that we could follow something through.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7122|Canberra, AUS
Giving a tad more than 0.2% aid would be nice.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6841|The Gem Saloon
LOL @ "World Opinion".
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7208

Parker wrote:

LOL @ "World Opinion".
Ya...go piss up a rope wankers.
babak
Member
+2|6640
First of all pay attention to global warming and the most important: don't think about start another war.
RECONDO67
Member
+60|7083|miami FL
stop getting involved in shit that is not our business
Ridir
Semper Fi!
+48|7211
With the way world economics work, and the fact that the United States has large investments across the globe I'd say that pretty much anything it wants is its business.  Israel on the other hand is a friend of the USA and stopping the support of a friendly nation is rather backhanded.  Not to mention it would be like asking Iran, Syria, and a few other Islamic states to stop funding the organizations in Palestine, thats not going to happen either.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|7002
Close Gitmo. Withdraw from Iraq. Play fair on Israel. Be consistent and not hypocritical when it comes to the principle of encouraging 'democracy'. Stop undermining democratically elected governments. Completely rethink the way in which terrorism should be contained/policed. Stop going to pre-emptive war on extremely shoddy cases. That should just about do it.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-05-20 11:08:18)

jonsimon
Member
+224|6942

CameronPoe wrote:

Close Gitmo. Withdraw from Iraq. Play fair on Israel. Be consistent and not hypocritical when it comes to the principle of encouraging 'democracy'. Stop undermining democratically elected governments. Completely rethink the way in which terrorism should be contained/policed. Stop going to pre-emptive war on extremely shoddy cases. That should just about do it.
End military aid for private US interests.
Snake
Missing, Presumed Dead
+1,046|7013|England

Some thoughts:

1) Guantanamo Bay. Need I say anything else on that?

2) "Americanism". Seriously, Windows and everything is written in American English. That upsets a lot of the "English English" who are fed up of all the z's in words, or color instead of colour in programming languages etc etc. Provide the alternative that still works but gets changed per country and/or user.
Its not the official language and when English kids are brought up on computers they no longer know the English language - but an adapted version of it.

3) Stop trying to force democracy on other countries. Even though Saddam was a lunatic, he kept that country running. Smoothly. Now look at all of the uprisings and problems between Shia's and Sunnies. Didnt happen under Saddam - although that's because they were oppressed, thats not the point. Democracy doesn't and can't work everywhere.
(I know we went along with it, but we'll ignore that since Blair is/was Bush's puppet).

4) Views, opinions and all the rest of it with regards to pollution. It is a globally recognised problem, yet somehow the biggest superpower in the world (well, the heads anyway) dont recognise it?
I think the film "Day after tomorrow" shows perfectly the relationship of the science and politicians - not wanting to sacrifice the economy to save the world. Even though its only a film, to me, it is a solid point that seems too true for liking.

Last edited by Snake (2007-05-20 11:26:20)

Ridir
Semper Fi!
+48|7211

CameronPoe wrote:

Close Gitmo. Withdraw from Iraq. Play fair on Israel. Be consistent and not hypocritical when it comes to the principle of encouraging 'democracy'. Stop undermining democratically elected governments. Completely rethink the way in which terrorism should be contained/policed. Stop going to pre-emptive war on extremely shoddy cases. That should just about do it.
So close one of our deepwater ports or just the detainment center?

Withdrawing from Iraq leads to what? a larger more broad civil war that will more then likely suck in several neighboring countries? Oh and if we had just waited until Saddam had died there was the probability of this happening anyway (the Civil war, civil unrest and daily killings) seems to happen a lot after a facist leaves power, and he had two sons not one, so there would probably have been infighting there as well.

Play fair on Israel? So because you don't like the way things are done it is unfair?  I've read most of the Israel/Palestine/insurgent group post and you support the Palestine/insurgents 100% Israel 0% because it is the way you were brought up and your beliefs are nearly set in stone.  I on the other hand support Israel most of the time but there are some things that I see that could be done better, of course that is from an outside point of view without the suicide bombings, rockets, etc flying at my head.  Just because you think it doesn't make it fair.

Encouraging democracy is a lie in any way shape and form, we're a republic.  Besides the misnaming issue there is the issue of each case is unique and different.  If you expect everything to fall into neat little cookie cutter situations and one "fair & balanced" consistent way would work everytime then you are more niave then you first appeared.

For us to stop undermining democratically elected governments... well how about let's play fair.  They don't undermine what we try and do and we don't undermine them.  Oh and rigged elections don't count as democratically elected governments either.

Completely rethink the way that terriorism is contained and policed.  What do you want? Non-military action with kisses, hugs, and a few million dollars for a relief fund through the U.N. Of course it just would not end up like the food donations from the U.N., you know hijacked by the "freedom fighters" of the region and used for their ends not what the United Nations has in mind such as the poor starving people. 
Yea, sure, Iraq had a bad case.  Only evidence and testimonials from the previous adminstration (both Al Gore and Bill Clinton were caught on camera saying that Iraq had and would continue to research, develop, and maintain weapons of mass destruction).  The war against Iraq was an excellent example of military might.  The conflict sense then has been dragged on by outside forces such as terrorist organizations and other nations (Syria and Iran to name two) training and shipping in fighters.  Of all of the terrorist acts last year I believe 47% were in Iraq (according to either MSN or TIME magazine).  These aren't just going to stop if the US leaves, they will continue until either a new fasict regime is in place or Iraq becomes a puppet government for Iran, or part of Iran; much more likely a puppet government for a time until the hate between smoldering factions dies down due to propoganda.

Oh and the other fellow, "end of military aid for private US intrest."  Your suggestion for this then would be?  Do not protect the intrest of US government, corporations, citizens or economy?  What nation do you know would actually do that?  Yours?  I don't think so.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|7002

Ridir wrote:

So close one of our deepwater ports or just the detainment center?
Just the detainment centre. Charge those you have evidence against, free the rest.

Ridir wrote:

Withdrawing from Iraq leads to what? a larger more broad civil war that will more then likely suck in several neighboring countries? Oh and if we had just waited until Saddam had died there was the probability of this happening anyway (the Civil war, civil unrest and daily killings) seems to happen a lot after a facist leaves power, and he had two sons not one, so there would probably have been infighting there as well.
You asked what needed to be done to change opinion, I'm just giving you the newsflash. Are you suggesting remaining in Iraq forever? Because with the US there will NEVER be peace. Just consider that when you blow the overblown trumpet of 'stay the course'. As for what happens next in Iraq: that is a concern for Iraqis not us. Certainly not for a nation that lies 10,000 miles away from Iraq. Civil war is needed and must be allowed to play out naturally. The rest of the world dislikes it when a nation unnecessarily intervenes in other nations affairs. The only time that they condone it is when the mission is seen as almost totally selfless.

Ridir wrote:

Play fair on Israel? So because you don't like the way things are done it is unfair?  I've read most of the Israel/Palestine/insurgent group post and you support the Palestine/insurgents 100% Israel 0% because it is the way you were brought up and your beliefs are nearly set in stone.  I on the other hand support Israel most of the time but there are some things that I see that could be done better, of course that is from an outside point of view without the suicide bombings, rockets, etc flying at my head.  Just because you think it doesn't make it fair.
So supporting the idea of a two state solution is supporting Israel 0%. You might want to take a look at your fucking 'road map' to peace in the middle east. The US has vetoed practically every resolution condemning Israeli human rights abuses since the foundation of the state of Israel. A lot of time the entire world stands in unison against Israeli atrocities at the UN with one glaring exception: USA (Germany usually abstains). Remember the OP question. I'm just explaining why the US is seen as unfair in this regard and is an obstacle to peace between Israel and Palestine. You can support Israeli goals without wholeheartedly endorsing theft/human rights abuses. It is anothe double standard that irks people in 'the outside world'.

Ridir wrote:

Encouraging democracy is a lie in any way shape and form, we're a republic.  Besides the misnaming issue there is the issue of each case is unique and different.  If you expect everything to fall into neat little cookie cutter situations and one "fair & balanced" consistent way would work everytime then you are more niave then you first appeared.
Again - this is a major reason why 'world opinion' is currently anti-US. You spew lies at your press conferences and carry out hypocritical acts and expect people to be like 'Yeah! Go USA!'. France, the UK and Russia are just as big culprits but the US seems to have its grubby hands in more jars than the rest of them combined. People in the outside worlds generally assume the worst about true US intentions on the world stage from the mistrust built up from a) intransigent support for everything Israel does, b) pettiness with Cuba, c) undermining and subverting democracy throughout Latin America, d) turning a blind eye to the human rights abuses of stategic allies (e.g. Saudi Arabia), e) harping on about the Geneva Convention and then publishing photos of inmates at the draconian Gitmo detention centre. I think the duplicitness of recent US administrations have been exposed for all to see and people are now tired of it.

Ridir wrote:

For us to stop undermining democratically elected governments... well how about let's play fair.  They don't undermine what we try and do and we don't undermine them.  Oh and rigged elections don't count as democratically elected governments either.
Did your goverment tell you such and such election was rigged? All about who you believe. Shouldn't be any of your business anyway - it should be a matter for those in the country in question alone. And who the fuck is undermining the US government?

Ridir wrote:

What do you want? Non-military action with kisses, hugs, and a few million dollars for a relief fund through the U.N. Of course it just would not end up like the food donations from the U.N., you know hijacked by the "freedom fighters" of the region and used for their ends not what the United Nations has in mind such as the poor starving people. 
Yea, sure, Iraq had a bad case.  Only evidence and testimonials from the previous adminstration (both Al Gore and Bill Clinton were caught on camera saying that Iraq had and would continue to research, develop, and maintain weapons of mass destruction).  The war against Iraq was an excellent example of military might.  The conflict sense then has been dragged on by outside forces such as terrorist organizations and other nations (Syria and Iran to name two) training and shipping in fighters.  Of all of the terrorist acts last year I believe 47% were in Iraq (according to either MSN or TIME magazine).  These aren't just going to stop if the US leaves, they will continue until either a new fasict regime is in place or Iraq becomes a puppet government for Iran, or part of Iran; much more likely a puppet government for a time until the hate between smoldering factions dies down due to propoganda.
I've posted my tactics several times. Typical pro-war response: 'action with kisses, hugs, and a few million dollars for a relief fund'. This is getting really old.

1. Seal western borders watertight. Spend billions on border security, airport security, international rail-link security and seaport security. Employ Israeli standards of airport/seaport/border security (I've been subjected to it myself and can declare without reservation that it IS the best in the world) - they live in the midst millions of people who hate their guts and these days suicide bombings, etc. are very very few and far between.

2. Spend billions on domestic and international intelligence gathering and domestic policing/surveillance (within reasonable boundaries).

3. Never cede the moral high ground or abandon your principles. Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay are draconian and unjust stains on the free world and they do not promote trust or goodwill.

4. Face up to the fact that the west overlooks Israeli human rights violations and contravention of international law and address these issues. Boycott Israel and let them fend for themselves.

5. End economic imperialism and underhanded and opportunistic foreign policy. Adopt isolationism.

6. Spend billions on researching alternative fuel sources.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6976|Global Command

CameronPoe wrote:

Ridir wrote:

So close one of our deepwater ports or just the detainment center?
Just the detainment centre. Charge those you have evidence against, free the rest.

Ridir wrote:

Withdrawing from Iraq leads to what? a larger more broad civil war that will more then likely suck in several neighboring countries? Oh and if we had just waited until Saddam had died there was the probability of this happening anyway (the Civil war, civil unrest and daily killings) seems to happen a lot after a facist leaves power, and he had two sons not one, so there would probably have been infighting there as well.
You asked what needed to be done to change opinion, I'm just giving you the newsflash. Are you suggesting remaining in Iraq forever? Because with the US there will NEVER be peace. Just consider that when you blow the overblown trumpet of 'stay the course'. As for what happens next in Iraq: that is a concern for Iraqis not us. Certainly not for a nation that lies 10,000 miles away from Iraq. Civil war is needed and must be allowed to play out naturally. The rest of the world dislikes it when a nation unnecessarily intervenes in other nations affairs. The only time that they condone it is when the mission is seen as almost totally selfless.

Ridir wrote:

Play fair on Israel? So because you don't like the way things are done it is unfair?  I've read most of the Israel/Palestine/insurgent group post and you support the Palestine/insurgents 100% Israel 0% because it is the way you were brought up and your beliefs are nearly set in stone.  I on the other hand support Israel most of the time but there are some things that I see that could be done better, of course that is from an outside point of view without the suicide bombings, rockets, etc flying at my head.  Just because you think it doesn't make it fair.
So supporting the idea of a two state solution is supporting Israel 0%. You might want to take a look at your fucking 'road map' to peace in the middle east. The US has vetoed practically every resolution condemning Israeli human rights abuses since the foundation of the state of Israel. A lot of time the entire world stands in unison against Israeli atrocities at the UN with one glaring exception: USA (Germany usually abstains). Remember the OP question. I'm just explaining why the US is seen as unfair in this regard and is an obstacle to peace between Israel and Palestine. You can support Israeli goals without wholeheartedly endorsing theft/human rights abuses. It is anothe double standard that irks people in 'the outside world'.

Ridir wrote:

Encouraging democracy is a lie in any way shape and form, we're a republic.  Besides the misnaming issue there is the issue of each case is unique and different.  If you expect everything to fall into neat little cookie cutter situations and one "fair & balanced" consistent way would work everytime then you are more niave then you first appeared.
Again - this is a major reason why 'world opinion' is currently anti-US. You spew lies at your press conferences and carry out hypocritical acts and expect people to be like 'Yeah! Go USA!'. France, the UK and Russia are just as big culprits but the US seems to have its grubby hands in more jars than the rest of them combined. People in the outside worlds generally assume the worst about true US intentions on the world stage from the mistrust built up from a) intransigent support for everything Israel does, b) pettiness with Cuba, c) undermining and subverting democracy throughout Latin America, d) turning a blind eye to the human rights abuses of stategic allies (e.g. Saudi Arabia), e) harping on about the Geneva Convention and then publishing photos of inmates at the draconian Gitmo detention centre. I think the duplicitness of recent US administrations have been exposed for all to see and people are now tired of it.

Ridir wrote:

For us to stop undermining democratically elected governments... well how about let's play fair.  They don't undermine what we try and do and we don't undermine them.  Oh and rigged elections don't count as democratically elected governments either.
Did your goverment tell you such and such election was rigged? All about who you believe. Shouldn't be any of your business anyway - it should be a matter for those in the country in question alone. And who the fuck is undermining the US government?

Ridir wrote:

What do you want? Non-military action with kisses, hugs, and a few million dollars for a relief fund through the U.N. Of course it just would not end up like the food donations from the U.N., you know hijacked by the "freedom fighters" of the region and used for their ends not what the United Nations has in mind such as the poor starving people. 
Yea, sure, Iraq had a bad case.  Only evidence and testimonials from the previous adminstration (both Al Gore and Bill Clinton were caught on camera saying that Iraq had and would continue to research, develop, and maintain weapons of mass destruction).  The war against Iraq was an excellent example of military might.  The conflict sense then has been dragged on by outside forces such as terrorist organizations and other nations (Syria and Iran to name two) training and shipping in fighters.  Of all of the terrorist acts last year I believe 47% were in Iraq (according to either MSN or TIME magazine).  These aren't just going to stop if the US leaves, they will continue until either a new fasict regime is in place or Iraq becomes a puppet government for Iran, or part of Iran; much more likely a puppet government for a time until the hate between smoldering factions dies down due to propoganda.
I've posted my tactics several times. Typical pro-war response: 'action with kisses, hugs, and a few million dollars for a relief fund'. This is getting really old.

1. Seal western borders watertight. Spend billions on border security, airport security, international rail-link security and seaport security. Employ Israeli standards of airport/seaport/border security (I've been subjected to it myself and can declare without reservation that it IS the best in the world) - they live in the midst millions of people who hate their guts and these days suicide bombings, etc. are very very few and far between.

2. Spend billions on domestic and international intelligence gathering and domestic policing/surveillance (within reasonable boundaries).

3. Never cede the moral high ground or abandon your principles. Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay are draconian and unjust stains on the free world and they do not promote trust or goodwill.

4. Face up to the fact that the west overlooks Israeli human rights violations and contravention of international law and address these issues. Boycott Israel and let them fend for themselves.

5. End economic imperialism and underhanded and opportunistic foreign policy. Adopt isolationism.

6. Spend billions on researching alternative fuel sources.
I concede all but #4
stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|7167|California

Drop trou and let the world shaft us with sanctions for fucking up their lives in some way or another
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7048|132 and Bush

Spark wrote:

Giving a tad more than 0.2% aid would be nice.
I guess you only consider what the government gives as US aide. Our private sector gives much more than any other country as well, which has a much greater direct impact than going through bureaucratic channels.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
derstralle
Iron Egg Skill, bitches!
+29|6662

Kmarion wrote:

I guess you only consider what the government gives as US aide. Our private sector gives much more than any other country as well, which has a much greater direct impact than going through bureaucratic channels.
Source?
Schwarzelungen
drunklenglungen
+133|6743|Bloomington Indiana

Mr.Dude2 wrote:

Make Ricky Martin a US citizen 
oh no...i think thatd get us klilled
konfusion
mostly afk
+480|6997|CH/BR - in UK

I agree with all CamPoe's points - plus this: Help get rid of the Veto option in the UN. That thing pisses me off, and is for sole benefit of the "major powers", on cost of the rest.

-konfusion

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard