Pages: 1 … 3 4 5

 

2007-05-24 11:16:49
GATOR591957
Member
+84|7074

ThomasMorgan wrote:

1. Bush didn't declare war on Iraq because of 9-11.

2. The president cannot declare war.  Congress does.
Congress did not declare war.  Congress authorized the use of force if the UN sanctions were not adhered to.  Bush took this and interpreted it to suit his means.  Like so many other freedoms and liberty's, he's attempted to interpret the constitution to meet his needs. 
In response to earlier posts: "2 years of war."   Where the hell have you been???

Puppet.  He is and always will be.  It doesn't matter who is or is not currently a puppet of their own regime. What matters is he is a instrument for Rumsfeld and Cheyney and the oil industry to play like a flute.
2007-05-24 11:23:06
GATOR591957
Member
+84|7074

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

Ryan wrote:

But imagine if you were in his position right now.

You are appointed the position of President of the United States of America.
September 11th rolls around, and you must do something to save your country.
You declare war on Iraq and begin dumping the troops in there.

Then we have all these people that hate Bush because of the way he is running our country.
Wouldn't you be the same if you ran it? Maybe he doesn't have a choice (ironic). Maybe the best thing he can think of is to use instinct and fight back.

So the next time you want to say "I hate Bush", just think about what you would be like if you were the president.

Sure, you may say "I would run the country much better than he does, and I would be extracting the troops as we speak." But actions speak louder than words.
Thats the problem with liberals, there quick to tell you whats wrong, but never provide an answer.
And the problem with Republicans is they think they have an answer and when it goes wrong, blame the Democrats.
2007-05-24 11:28:02
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6630|Ireland

GATOR591957 wrote:

Dezerteagal5 wrote:

Thats the problem with liberals, there quick to tell you whats wrong, but never provide an answer.
And the problem with Republicans is they think they have an answer and when it goes wrong, blame the Democrats.
Let's be realistic, both parties suck.  Just look at where the last 40 years of Democratic rule got us and 6 years of Republican rule.  Neither party does what is in the best interest of America unless the party can gain from it.  They represent their parties first, the electorate second, and America's interests last. 

This is so assbackwards that I don't see how a person could argue in favor of either party without knowing how foolish it sounds.
2007-05-24 12:59:06
JahManRed
wank
+646|7075|IRELAND

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

IED's are against the laws of war

non uniformed combatants are against the laws of war

recorded beheadings are against the laws of war

suicide bombing civilian areas of interest is against the laws of war.
Didn't Bush say the war was over when he stood on that boat and said so?

He declared war on terror, on terrorists and this is how terrorist fight. And this is why any gods amount of solders in Iraqi isn't going to win it.

This is an insurgency a guerrilla war and all the rule books go out the window I'm afraid.

The book needs rewrote. The British had plenty of practice over here and after decades beating their heads off a brick wall, had to go to the table and take and give concessions. Its the only way forward.

A good deed or action by a US solder or unit is forgotten very quickly when a bomb goes off causing carnage and these peoples rationale says "if the US wasn't in my country that bomb wouldn't have gone off". Sad but true.
2007-05-24 13:01:34
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|7109|USA

Ryan wrote:

But imagine if you were in his position right now.

You are appointed the position of President of the United States of America.
September 11th rolls around, and you must do something to save your country.
You declare war on Iraq and begin dumping the troops in there.

Then we have all these people that hate Bush because of the way he is running our country.
Wouldn't you be the same if you ran it? Maybe he doesn't have a choice (ironic). Maybe the best thing he can think of is to use instinct and fight back.

So the next time you want to say "I hate Bush", just think about what you would be like if you were the president.

Sure, you may say "I would run the country much better than he does, and I would be extracting the troops as we speak." But actions speak louder than words.
Yes I hate him and he is a fuckhead. Search. Im not repeating the same shit.

BTW if I were President, I'd appoint people with expertise and backgrounds rather than "daddy's old hunt club cohorts" and the 20 people I know from Texas.

FUck him and any thread justifying his fuck ups. As an American you have all been exploited.

Call EA.
2007-05-24 13:10:54
oChaos.Haze
Member
+90|6885

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Ryan wrote:

But imagine if you were in his position right now.

You are appointed the position of President of the United States of America.
September 11th rolls around, and you must do something to save your country.
You declare war on Iraq and begin dumping the troops in there.

Then we have all these people that hate Bush because of the way he is running our country.
Wouldn't you be the same if you ran it? Maybe he doesn't have a choice (ironic). Maybe the best thing he can think of is to use instinct and fight back.

So the next time you want to say "I hate Bush", just think about what you would be like if you were the president.

Sure, you may say "I would run the country much better than he does, and I would be extracting the troops as we speak." But actions speak louder than words.
Yes I hate him and he is a fuckhead. Search. Im not repeating the same shit.

BTW if I were President, I'd appoint people with expertise and backgrounds rather than "daddy's old hunt club cohorts" and the 20 people I know from Texas.

FUck him and any thread justifying his fuck ups. As an American you have all been exploited.

Call EA.
QFT  Mason I like you more and more everyday.

Last edited by oChaos.Haze (2007-05-24 13:11:04)

2007-05-24 15:25:39
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7290|Alberta, Canada

Why are IED's against the laws of war?
2007-05-24 15:33:27
Magpie
international welder....Douchebag Dude, <3 ur mom
+257|6973|Milkystania, yurop

Ryan wrote:

But imagine if you were in his position right now.

You are appointed the position of President of the United States of America.
September 11th rolls around, and you must do something to save your country.
You declare war on Iraq and begin dumping the troops in there.
It was afghanistan first and america had the world behind them , but when the douche decided to invade iraq say that they had WMD and was able to use it. Yeah how did he save america by invading iraq? fuck him lying bastard

 

Pages: 1 … 3 4 5

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard