Female Airman Punished for Threesome

2007-05-28 02:08:00

#1

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,073|7218|PNW

I have no idea if I was beaten to this or not, but a cursory search revealed nothing, so here goes:

SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, Germany — A Spangdahlem-based airman was sentenced Monday to four months confinement for her part in a sexual act with two other airmen.

Article cont'd....

Related link: http://www.dosomethingamazing.com/?or=afh

Act of (yeah, we don't know but it might be) rape or an incitement for mass recruitment?

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-05-28 02:38:45)

2007-05-28 02:17:32

#2

Major.League.Infidel: Make Love and War; +303|6925|Communist Republic of CA, USA

If consent wasn't given, then it's rape. Just because your some flyboy (flygirl) that got drunk and horny doesn't mean you can screw anyone you want. On a side note, I did laugh at the picture of the two F-15's refueling off the Tanker. Funny Comparison

2007-05-28 02:19:17

#3

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6852|North Carolina

Yep... where do I sign up indeed...

2007-05-28 02:20:58

#4

wachtler83: Member; +22|7033|Columbus,Ohio

wait did it say she raped them wtf

2007-05-28 02:22:05

#5

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,073|7218|PNW

Major.League.Infidel wrote:
If consent wasn't given, then it's rape. Just because your some flyboy (flygirl) that got drunk and horny doesn't mean you can screw anyone you want. On a side note, I did laugh at the picture of the two F-15's refueling off the Tanker. Funny Comparison

Indeed, but the staff sergeant didn't testify. Oh well, gives the lawfficers something to haggle about.

2007-05-28 02:22:46

#6

Major.League.Infidel: Make Love and War; +303|6925|Communist Republic of CA, USA

Rains and Airman Christopher D. Hicks are the only airmen charged in the incident because the Air Force lawyers said the staff sergeant was too drunk to give consent.

Sounds like Rape to me. Sure, Hicks and Rains didn't rape each other (or did they...?) but if they got their SSgt too drunk to respond, that's rape in my book.

2007-05-28 02:29:11

#7

~FuzZz~: .yag era uoy fi siht deaR; +422|6769|Orrstrayleea

Arrgghh....two guys and only one girl? it would have been ok with me if it was two girls and one guy

2007-05-28 02:32:50

#8

blisteringsilence: I'd rather hunt with Cheney than ride with Kennedy; +83|7148|Little Rock, Arkansas

Pea....Tear.....Griffen wrote:
Arrgghh....two guys and only one girl? it would have been ok with me if it was two girls and one guy

It was two girls and one guy.

And the law is that if you're too drunk to give consent, it's rape. That's the way it works. Sucks for her, but that's the chance you take when you rolls the dice.

2007-05-28 02:33:12

#9

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,073|7218|PNW

Pea....Tear.....Griffen wrote:
Arrgghh....two guys and only one girl? it would have been ok with me if it was two girls and one guy

From a quick skim of the article, I was under the impression that it was two girls and a guy. They don't call them "airwomen" if they're female.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-05-28 02:33:30)

2007-05-28 02:35:54

#10

T.Pike: 99 Problems . . .; +187|6729|Pennsyltucky

I can't believe no on stated the obvious.

This thread is WORTLESS without Pics !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-05-28 02:37:29

#11

T.Pike: 99 Problems . . .; +187|6729|Pennsyltucky

unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Pea....Tear.....Griffen wrote:
Arrgghh....two guys and only one girl? it would have been ok with me if it was two girls and one guy
From a quick skim of the article, I was under the impression that it was two girls and a guy. They don't call them "airwomen" if they're female.

Nope. 2 females & one male. Apparently a woman CAN be an AIRMAN 1st class.

What's trippy is the female NOT being chrged is a freakin' staff Sgt!

You would hope a non-commissioned officer would be held to a higher standard.

2007-05-28 02:37:39

#12

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,073|7218|PNW

T.Pike wrote:
I can't believe no on stated the obvious.

This thread is WORTLESS without Pics !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y76/unnamednewbie13/lead_070523c.jpg

updated op

[edit]Votes indicate that more people are interested in taking part in the Air Force experience than are concerned over the article. Which military branch will next follow suit?[/edit]

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-05-28 02:43:32)

2007-05-28 02:38:56

#13

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7008

I find it a little interesting that all three were drunk and yet you're all jumping to the defense of one of them.

2007-05-28 02:41:07

#14

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6852|North Carolina

Bubbalo wrote:
I find it a little interesting that all three were drunk and yet you're all jumping to the defense of one of them.

Good point... This really is a murky situation, since levels of drunkenness aren't very easy to define without video evidence or a lot of witnesses.

2007-05-28 02:44:10

#15

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,073|7218|PNW

Turquoise wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
I find it a little interesting that all three were drunk and yet you're all jumping to the defense of one of them.
Good point... This really is a murky situation, since levels of drunkenness aren't very easy to define without video evidence or a lot of witnesses.

The lawfficers seem to know a lot about what happened.

2007-05-28 02:46:37

#16

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|7008

Turquoise wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
I find it a little interesting that all three were drunk and yet you're all jumping to the defense of one of them.
Good point... This really is a murky situation, since levels of drunkenness aren't very easy to define without video evidence or a lot of witnesses.

I suppose what I'm saying is that a sober person can say: that person is too drunk to give consent. A drunk person, however, can't necessarily be expected to make that sort of judgement (though if the person outright refuses drunkenness is no excuse).

2007-05-28 02:46:58

#17

some_random_panda: Flamesuit essential; +454|6837

Turquoise wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
I find it a little interesting that all three were drunk and yet you're all jumping to the defense of one of them.
Good point... This really is a murky situation, since levels of drunkenness aren't very easy to define without video evidence or a lot of witnesses.

Whoa, video evidence? What video evidence?

*hides camera*

2007-05-28 02:49:47

#18

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6852|North Carolina

Bubbalo wrote:
Turquoise wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
I find it a little interesting that all three were drunk and yet you're all jumping to the defense of one of them.
Good point... This really is a murky situation, since levels of drunkenness aren't very easy to define without video evidence or a lot of witnesses.
I suppose what I'm saying is that a sober person can say: that person is too drunk to give consent. A drunk person, however, can't necessarily be expected to make that sort of judgement (though if the person outright refuses drunkenness is no excuse).

Yet another angle I didn't think of.... That's true as well...

2007-05-29 06:15:57

#19

konfusion: mostly afk; +480|6997|CH/BR - in UK

Define rape... This just looks like a stupid mistake - the kind you tend to make when drunk...

-konfusion

2007-05-29 07:27:44

#20

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|7163

Wow a chick raping a chick. Awesome.

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2007-05-29 01:49:24

#21

Varegg: Support fanatic :-); +2,206|7257|Nårvei

Did you read the article yourself ??

Is says she raped a drunk female soldier with the aid of a male soldier, so convicting a rapist is a waste of dollars ??

Wait behind the line ..............................................................

2007-05-29 02:15:41

#22

Hunter/Jumper: Member; +117|6801

sounds like a video

2007-05-29 03:23:23

#23

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|7096

This is where ATG's quote of "if there ever was a thread that needed pic's, this is it" comes into play.

And remember kids, if they're unconscious, they can't say no!

2007-05-29 03:33:08

#24

=TBG=Zoton: my mum says i'm cool; +22|7101|Australia

ghettoperson wrote:
And remember kids, if they're unconscious, they can't say no!

rofl excellent point there. everyone should take that into consideration

2007-05-29 05:54:07

#25

Skorpy-chan: Member; +127|6792|Twyford, UK

Oh, it's this one again, with the incredibly appropriate stock image.

3-way mid-air refuelling in an article about rape and sodomy charges.

Yes.	25%	25% - 11
No.	31%	31% - 14
Where do I sign up?	43%	43% - 19
Total: 44

BF2S Forums Female Airman Punished for Threesome

Poll

Major.League.Infidel wrote:

Pea....Tear.....Griffen wrote:

Pea....Tear.....Griffen wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Pea....Tear.....Griffen wrote:

T.Pike wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Board footer