ReDevilJR
Member
+106|6822
Hey, anyone else see this? Is it worth it to upgrade your library once theirs is all set up?

I personally encode my music through Windows Media Player @ 128kbps, I think it's fine.

Would one hear better audio if you were to have a surround sound setup? (@ Apple's 256kbps/Regular 256kbps) Because I can't really too much of a difference for 2.1 Audio...

BTW, I'm not really an Audiophile...

Last edited by ReDevilJR (2007-06-01 17:56:41)

Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7072|132 and Bush

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39957

Apple has had privacy issues before so this doesn't surprise me.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
The#1Spot
Member
+105|7011|byah
actually 80kbps or 96 does just as well
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|7101|Washington, DC

Kmarion wrote:

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39957

Apple has had privacy issues before so this doesn't surprise me.
Simple solution: Don't do things that are illegal like sending files around P2P...

If there are songs you listen to I guess it's worth it. I don't see the point right now; I could upgrade maybe two songs for DRM-free which doesn't matter since i have an iPod and for a negligible audio quality increase.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7072|132 and Bush

Hurricane wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39957

Apple has had privacy issues before so this doesn't surprise me.
Simple solution: Don't do things that are illegal like sending files around P2P...

If there are songs you listen to I guess it's worth it. I don't see the point right now; I could upgrade maybe two songs for DRM-free which doesn't matter since i have an iPod and for a negligible audio quality increase.
Embedding your itunes account and email? It's not what you do with it, it's what someone else does with your music.

It doesn't much matter though.
Xbone Stormsurgezz

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard