CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
i've been to Israel twice (once in '98 and once just a few months ago). i've been also to west bank (well - driven through it and this was in the earlier trip). Honestly, it looked like New jersey to me at that time - just a bunch of farms. I'm sure if i was to go into the towns it would be different - granted. What i did notice is that many of the areas that the Israelis have settled, the area actually improves. I'm not convinced that this happened in the previous 1000 years with nomadic palestinians running around.
Whether what was once a desert is now an oasis under Israeli occupation is irrelevant in the context of international law and of what is right and wrong. It is not the Israelis land to do anything with. If the Palestinians want to waste their resources then that is their right. If you are seriously telling me that you thought the West Bank was like New Jersey then I find it hard to take you seriously. Do you have any idea what the GNP per capita is in Palestine? Do you realise that those roads you probably travelled on through the West Bank are forbidden to Palestinians and that they cut up the Palestinian road infrastructure making the West Bank into a patchwork of non-contiguous cantons. Commutes in Palestine can take 11 hours because of Israeli built roads and IDF roadblocks. How on earth is any state of Palestine going to prosper economically in such conditions - it isn't: and that is Israel's intention.
CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
what i have a big problem with is that instead of just sucking it up and playing along they fight. if the palestinians would instead just focus on stopping violence educating their kids in science/math/medicine instead of the koran at islamic universities, i'm sure they would improve their lives. Then - and here's the kicker - after a bunch of years of playing nice, improving their living conditions, i'm sure they could work out deals with government to have a two state solution. instead, they are committed to a one state solution - ie, palestine not israel.
I'm Irish. The Irish didn't suck it up and play along while the Brits ravaged our country and tried to destroy us, our language and our culture. You need to engage the empathy section of your brain if you are gonna begin to understand the Palestinian point of view - a point of view based of being driven off their land, out of their homes, of artillery shells, internment without charge or trial, extra-judicial killings and much, much more. Palestinians are very well educated as far as I could see. I had a degree holder treat me to a tour of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem in the West Bank for a pittance of a tip because a) he had no hope of getting proper work and b) he needed food on his plate. While I was there the Israelis had a cordon of tanks around the town and a curfew in place after dark.
Fatah are committed to a TWO-STATE solution. Hamas is the current problem, along with the hard right wing Kadima/Likud governments of Israel.
CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
Cameron, i appreciate your comments it's just that i simply disagree with them. i think you over-react a bit with the ghetto comments on the palestinian situation when in fact it is they who caused this in first place. I have some palestinian friends who are Israeli citizens and live a great life over there. They are educated and 'play along' i guess you could say. they are not militant and lead very productive lives. maybe this hits upon a good point (education level).
I disagree with the they 'caused this in [the] first place' - in agreement with international opinion at the UN re 1967 but in disagreement with them on sanctioning a state of Israel in 1948. I now agree that Israel should exist, a state defined by 1948 borders (in accordance with international law) but I do not concede that the Arabs started it. The Zionist movement and the British government/random members of the international community started this. If anywhere the Jews should have been given eastern Germany (modern day western Poland) as a state.
CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
I believe the ones who have difficult time are from the lands that Israel took in 1967 or 1973 wars and are actually Jordanians. So again, i pose the question, why doesn't Jordan or Lebanon take these poor people in and help out? it would crush their infrastructures to have to care for all these indigent people. So, they use it as a thorn in the side of Israel. Israel is in a life-or-death battle with the rest of the middle east. That's the way i see it.
There is a point that we will respectfully agree to disagree upon. I don't hold to the view that Palestinians are Jordanians. They were part of Ottoman-era administrative region of Palestine, Jordanians are from the other side of the river. Jordan can't help out because they sold themselves down the river by accepting peace with Israel, same goes for Egypt. The refugees in Jordan and all over the middle east have their homes in Palestine. They want to go back home. I accept that that is no longer feasible but I believe Israel should pay them reparations for the inconvenience and cost to them (similar to German reparations to the Jewish after WWII).
You're right Israel is in a life-or-death situation in the middle east. To be honest I'm surprised it's lasted so long. When some rogue group
inevitably gets their hands on a serious WMD it'll be curtains for Israel (and most likely the rest of the middle east too).
CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
Regarding the security wall, it's just one possible solution. If you have tons of people moving in/out of a region that are smuggling arms and probably other things, how might you suggest you control this flow for protection sake? Of course, we should strive to prevent the situation in first place and that's our idealistic goal , however the practical goal might be short-term safety. If not a wall, what else?
I'm not saying 'No Wall' - I'm saying 'Build the wall on your own internationally recognised land'. It's a land grab, pure and simple. It certainly isn't working towards 'peace and reconciliation'.
CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
We face similar thing of sorts over here in US with mexico. I'd love for all the hard working immigrants to come to our country and contribute however more often than not they become a drain on our resources and my paycheck in form of social services we pay out to these people (my taxes). It's unfortunate they they are often lower skilled workers. believe me i would not be complaining if they all knew c++ or could code php, etc. as it is, they don't and come here to make a buck doing what they can. i see their drive as good but the fact that it is unchecked is the problem. who else might be coming across that wishes us ill will? maybe a few terrorist cells? mexican gangs? the list goes on and on. I'm not happy with my own choice of President on his handling of the border issue and it's become a hot topic over here of late. My belief is that we should deploy some national guard troops on border to help police the area.
I have said many times on this forum that the US shows woeful disregard for its southern border and if a wall is what it takes to fix it then so be it.