Poll

.40S&W vs .45ACP A personal choice?

.40 all the way. More bullets.43%43% - 52
.45 Why have more bullets? Only need to hit once.56%56% - 68
Total: 120
imortal
Member
+240|7137|Austin, TX
I am at having a problem with a decision.  I am buying a new pistol, as my fiance is inheriting my old Glock 23 .40 caliber.  Over the last 14 years, I have jumped between a glock .40 and a 1911 in .45, and now I am poised at an impasse.  My wrist can't handle the angle the Glock grip is set at, and I need something smaller than a 1911 for carry.  I looked and I looked, and I am finally settling on the Smith & Wesson Military and Police pistol (M&P).  My problem is picking between the .40 and the .45.  The .40 has a 15 round magazine, the .45 a 10 round.  The .45 is a couple oz heavier, and about a 1/2 inch longer.  That is the extent of the difference.

So, looking for opinions.  I am not saying I will go with what you all vote for, but I will think on it.

The S&W M&P .40 http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/ … y_rn=15711

The S&W M&P .45 http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/ … y_rn=15711
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6919|Chicago, IL
.40, both have enough stopping power, so you really only need to consider the number of rounds and the recoil, and the .40 wins in both
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|7041|Mountains of NC

.40 cap. of a 9mm but the stopping power of .45




out of everything on the market why did you boil down to S&W MP , just curious
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
imortal
Member
+240|7137|Austin, TX

SEREMAKER wrote:

out of everything on the market why did you boil down to S&W MP , just curious
believe me, it was a suprise.  I used to work in a couple shooting ranges when I was younger, and gathered a great deal of knowledge and opinions when I was there.  Chief among them was that S&W may make great revolvers, but their autos were crap.  But things change.  I took a grand look at the field, and this was my basic reasoning:

I want a polymer frame auto.  Needs to be light enough to carry for long periods of time.
I want at LEAST a .40, since I do not trust a 9mm with a one-shot stop.
Had to be Duty-sized, but small enough to still carry concealed.

Taurus 24/7 PT Pro- the rubber on the grip seems to not hold up under rigourous use.
Glock- grip angle too far for my wrist to handle anymore.
1911- full size too big, too heavy, to carry as I want. (yes, this is an opinion; so don't blast me how you all carry it just fine.)
SIGArms- never liked Sigs, and I do not want a decocker.
Baretta- I despise slide mounted safeties.
Browning- has a nice pistol, but I do not want a shiny showpiece.  I want it in black to reduce glares.
H&K- too big, quite expensive, grips just do not feel right.
Ruger- also with the slide-mounted safeties.
Spingfield Armory- the XD grip was the opposite of glock; was almost straight up and down; also felt bad on my wrist.
Smith & Wesson- the Sigma is crap, but the M&P is.... hey, that is not bad.  Grip feels just right.  Is a natural pointer for me.  That feels nice...

I will admit that it is subjective.  I do not claim they are the best model on the market or anything.  There are a lot of high quality firearms out there.  Just find one that does the job you want it to, feels right to you, and that you can afford.

Last edited by imortal (2007-06-23 10:05:24)

chittydog
less busy
+586|7308|Kubra, Damn it!

imortal wrote:

I am buying a new pistol, as my fiance is inheriting my old Glock 23 .40 caliber.
I don't know your gender, but am assuming your male since most of us here are. A "fiance" is a man you're going to marry. A woman you're going to marry is a "fiancee".

Back on topic, get the .40. Chances are (if you're lucky), the only time you'll ever fire it is at the range where the bigger clip is nice. If you have to use it in defense, one good shot is all you'll really need anyway. Actually, the bigger clip would be handy there too, just in case.
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6867|The Gem Saloon
have you looked into any kimbers?

i know that you said you found the gun you want, just throwing out another option.
ya, full size 1911s look like a school bus on my hip, but kimber has some VERY nice compact lines, and hell some of them are even double stacks.

anyway, i love .45s....always have, always will. proven stopping power that is only matched closely by the .357 sig round...and they have been kicking ass for damn near a century now.

i use IQ tac rounds when im carrying.

https://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/parkercustoms/uzi021.jpg


good luck and make sure you post some pics

Last edited by Parker (2007-06-23 10:27:39)

Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6918|The Land of Scott Walker

imortal wrote:

Smith & Wesson- the Sigma is crap, but the M&P is.... hey, that is not bad.  Grip feels just right.  Is a natural pointer for me.  That feels nice...
When I was looking at purchasing a pistol, I was told to buy what felt right.  I ended up purchasing a H&K USP and liked it but had to sell it several years later when I needed some money.  When I purchase a pistol again, it will probably be one of the Springfield XD line.  Natural pointer for me, which I feel is the most important thing.  My cousin has the .40 and he has 2 pistols in 1 after purchasing the 9mm parts which will fit the .40 frame.  I have yet to shoot a .40 so I don't have an opinion of my own, but I know I love the .45.  From what I've heard, the .40 is a great choice for a carry weapon.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6695|Escea

Get a deagle in .44.
Or one of these things http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg120-e.htm
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6867|The Gem Saloon

M.O.A.B wrote:

Get a deagle in .44.
Or one of these things http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg120-e.htm
first, if anyone decided to own anything from magnum research, im pretty sure it would be a .50.
second, he needs a CARRY gun.
third, he already said he doesnt like SIGs.
TGMaverick
Member
+16|6703
.40 for a couple of reasons

1) more capacity
2) less recoil, meaning you can stay on target longer.

If you ever have to fire at a live human being in self defense, you're not going to just shoot once.  More than likely, you're going to pull off quite a few rounds at your attacker.  Less recoil means more of a chance of staying on-target, and less chance of shooting wide and missing.
11sog_raider
a gaurdian of life
+112|6931|behind my rifle
what are you using this for? personal protection? or just target range shooting? if personal protection, i would go with the 45.
i wouldnt know that much about .40's, i have a .357 magnum, does fine
imortal
Member
+240|7137|Austin, TX

chittydog wrote:

imortal wrote:

I am buying a new pistol, as my fiance is inheriting my old Glock 23 .40 caliber.
I don't know your gender, but am assuming your male since most of us here are. A "fiance" is a man you're going to marry. A woman you're going to marry is a "fiancee".

Back on topic, get the .40. Chances are (if you're lucky), the only time you'll ever fire it is at the range where the bigger clip is nice. If you have to use it in defense, one good shot is all you'll really need anyway. Actually, the bigger clip would be handy there too, just in case.
well, fiance with one of those funny accent agu thingies the french love using, but my keyboard can't handle that.  Yup, was a guy last time I checked- hang on...  yup, still a male. 

I know.  I was just coming of gun buying age when the .45 v. 'wondernine' fight was in full swing.  The .40 came to pass and settled that argument- well, along with the Crime Bill and its 10 round magazine cap.  But I have still heard some fun stories from cop buddies with the .40 not always putting someone down.  A LOT better than the 9mm, don't get me wrong.  I will not carry anything smaller than a 9mm for serious defense, but the .40 is still the bottom of the acceptable list.  The .45 is pretty near the top of that list.

Recoil is a very real think to think about, especially if I am thinking of a polymer frame .45ACP.  The .40 would really improve time for and provide better accuracy for follow up shots.
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6867|The Gem Saloon
when you have tactical loads, the .40 might as well be a .45 as far as ballistics go.
i mean, you are arent going to have the same velocity and wieght, but it will still do big time damage.
if your heart is set on the .40, just find some really nice ammo.
imortal
Member
+240|7137|Austin, TX

Parker wrote:

have you looked into any kimbers?

i know that you said you found the gun you want, just throwing out another option.
ya, full size 1911s look like a school bus on my hip, but kimber has some VERY nice compact lines, and hell some of them are even double stacks.

anyway, i love .45s....always have, always will. proven stopping power that is only matched closely by the .357 sig round...and they have been kicking ass for damn near a century now.

i use IQ tac rounds when im carrying.

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/ … uzi021.jpg


good luck and make sure you post some pics
Yeah, used to own a Kimber, till I had to sell it for the cash.  Let's see, since I have been old enough to purchase pistols, I have had:

Ruger P89 9mm
Glock 22 .40
Firestorm .40
Ruger GP100 .357Mag
Browning HP 9mm
Colt 1991 .45ACP
H&K P7M9 9mm
Webly No. 1 Mk 6 (converted to .45ACP)
S&W 65 .357Mag
Glock 22 .40 (yes, again)
Kimber 1911 Eclipse 2 .45ACP

...and still currently own:
Ruger 22-45 .22LR
GLock 23 .40

At least, I THINK that is all of them.  I have been buying pistols since 1993.  Usually trade them in for the new ones, so my collection was always a rotating one.

Oh, and I currently carry Speer Gold Dot rounds when I carry, and Glaser Safety slugs (blue) for home defense.

Last edited by imortal (2007-06-23 11:52:26)

imortal
Member
+240|7137|Austin, TX

11sog_raider wrote:

what are you using this for? personal protection? or just target range shooting? if personal protection, i would go with the 45.
i wouldnt know that much about .40's, i have a .357 magnum, does fine
One of my current jobs is as a Commisioned Security guard, so need it for duty carry.
Need it for concealed carry for personal time.
Need it for home defense.
Need it for training and blowing off steam at the range.
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6867|The Gem Saloon
wow man, that is/was quite the collection....very impressive.

i just have the kimber, my wife carries a S&W chief tricked out (titanium, hammer removed, trigger, laser grip) and i keep a mossberg 500 20ga pistol for the house. (my best buy ever)

im lucky enough to make good friends where i sell my knives, and get to play with stuff like this : http://s47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/ … uzi009.flv


unfortunately between computers, guns, my dog, xbox etc.....i wont be spending anymore on firearms anytime soon. in fact my wife and i had a big discussion about it a couple nights ago. so if i want to keep my other hobbies, i cant get anymore guns for awhile.

anyway, good luck with your decision.
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7122

Hmmm... not that I know a great deal about guns, but I figure a .40 is big enough to stop most stuff, and the less recoil and more rounds would make it more suitable for protecting yourself. If it comes down to you having to use it, which I hope it doesn't, I'd rather have a few more bullets. 10 isn't really a lot.
RAIMIUS
You with the face!
+244|7187|US
I heard somewhere that the average shooting (not sure if this was defense/protection or all shootings) involve less than 5 rounds.

I like the idea of stopping power-.45
But .40 is cheaper to practice with and still is a potent round.

Have you considered the "Pro" line of Kimbers?  The CDP Pro (aluminum frame) seems very popular for carry use.

Last edited by RAIMIUS (2007-06-23 16:52:25)

Skorpy-chan
Member
+127|6818|Twyford, UK
1. .45 was good enough for the US army for god knows how long, why not for you?

2. Due to my wikiresearch, I'd suggest going for a 10mm auto. On a low-power load, you can get the .40 equivalency with almost the clip size of a 9mm, and if you go for the really packed loads, you can top .44 magnum rounds.
Only downside is the lack of manufacturer support and the need for handloading the really big rounds.

3. I still don't get why you people feel the need to carry handguns around. I mean, it's an incredibly inneficient way of killing someone in a hurry, very easy to hurt yourself with, expensive, and liable to get you arrested in some states.
A nice 12-gauge is a far better option, with the ability to blow chunks out of people at short range, or out up to SMG ranges with slugs. And with something that size, you're sure to only haul it out when REALLY needed.
trackstarr
Member
+18|7174|Swing and a miss
.45

never can go wrong with a .45

NEVER
imortal
Member
+240|7137|Austin, TX

Skorpy-chan wrote:

1. .45 was good enough for the US army for god knows how long, why not for you?

2. Due to my wikiresearch, I'd suggest going for a 10mm auto. On a low-power load, you can get the .40 equivalency with almost the clip size of a 9mm, and if you go for the really packed loads, you can top .44 magnum rounds.
Only downside is the lack of manufacturer support and the need for handloading the really big rounds.

3. I still don't get why you people feel the need to carry handguns around. I mean, it's an incredibly inneficient way of killing someone in a hurry, very easy to hurt yourself with, expensive, and liable to get you arrested in some states.
A nice 12-gauge is a far better option, with the ability to blow chunks out of people at short range, or out up to SMG ranges with slugs. And with something that size, you're sure to only haul it out when REALLY needed.
1. Cannot disagree, just want to keep considering it for a bit.

2.  I remember when the 10mm came out.  Was a very hot round, and puts a lot of stress on the frame.  Also, the round is longer than a .45, which makes for some akward grips.  Also, they found that the full power 10mm had... disapointing terminal effects.  They actually got it to perform better at a lower velocity, then cut the casing size and called it the .40 S&W.

3.  Your third point.  Hmmmm.  Well, you are from the UK, and so you are used to your society and its culture and customs.  I grew up around guns.  I have also seen crime.  Crime can happen anywhere, anytime.  It is best to be prepared at all times.  An inneficient way of killing someone in a hurry?  Well, you are not wrong about that.  But it does a remarkable job in stopping a threat with a quickness.

Unlike what some overly enthusiatic people would have you believe, the purpose of a self-defense pistol is not to kill your target, but to end that persons ability to be a threat to you or others.  In practice, that means put them on the ground an unable to continue the fight.  A handgun of sufficient caliber is quite adequit for that task.  Since this may very well involve taking a life, the act of carrying a weapon for personal protection is not one to be taken lightly.  You have to understand what the concequences of your actions could mean, and you have to be willing to accept the concequences for those actions.  But you also have to feel the responsibility to care for your own safety, as well as the safety of your loved ones and even just the people around you.

The police are not always there, nor do we want them to be, Americans being who we are.  And criminals, almost by definition, try to conduct their activities when the police are not around to catch them.  So it is up to the individual to protect themselves from criminals.  The police arrive later.  They clean up the mess.  They investigate.  They hunt and track criminals.  They will stop crime when they see it.  And they do a great job of it.  But until you find me a police force that can have a 2 second response time to any infraction, victims are on their own.  I have no intention of being a victim.  Ever.

Oh, and there are still areas in the US where dangerous animals roam.  Especially when suburbs are pushing into their territory, and long association with humans has erroded their fear of us.

As to the legality, I live in the state of Texas, where concealed carry is legal, provided you have a permit.  You have to go to a pretty serious class  for training, and your permit is on file with the state police.  There are also 2 interesting items to note about Texas.  This year, the state legislation has passed numerous laws protecting the lawful gun bearer; this shows where our state govermetn stands, at least.  And the second is a piece of information that was passed to me, but which I have not confirmed myself; that since Texas passed the Concealed Carry Law, no CCL permit carrier has been convicted of a single gun crime.

Oh, and here in the US, many of our states have passed a concealed carry law.  Every time such a law is passed, EVERY TIME, without exception, violent crime against persons has dropped significantly.
Skorpy-chan
Member
+127|6818|Twyford, UK
I don't doubt the crime, but why a handgun? I mean, you slip while drawing it, you risk blowing your toes off. You miss, you risk killing someone else entirely.
Surely something like a tazer would be more useful or effective.
(I'm not debating politics, merely the practicality and sensibility of carrying around a dispenser of hot lead. Politics is boring.)
JG1567JG
Member
+110|7061|United States of America

imortal wrote:

I am at having a problem with a decision.  I am buying a new pistol, as my fiance is inheriting my old Glock 23 .40 caliber.  Over the last 14 years, I have jumped between a glock .40 and a 1911 in .45, and now I am poised at an impasse.  My wrist can't handle the angle the Glock grip is set at, and I need something smaller than a 1911 for carry.  I looked and I looked, and I am finally settling on the Smith & Wesson Military and Police pistol (M&P).  My problem is picking between the .40 and the .45.  The .40 has a 15 round magazine, the .45 a 10 round.  The .45 is a couple oz heavier, and about a 1/2 inch longer.  That is the extent of the difference.

So, looking for opinions.  I am not saying I will go with what you all vote for, but I will think on it.

The S&W M&P .40 http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/ … y_rn=15711

The S&W M&P .45 http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/ … y_rn=15711
Since you are giving your Glock 23 to your fiance you might want to go with the .40 cal. so when you go to the range you can buy your ammo in bulk.  It might save you a little money if you shoot very much.
RedTwizzler
I do it for the lulz.
+124|7010|Chicago
I say go .40. It'll allow you to buy ammo in bulk for ranges and shit, and if you ever have to use it in self-defense, it'll still be effective - the average gun-toting kid in a gang isn't gonna be wearing a kevlar vest. A .40 will still stop/drop instantly.
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|7103|Washington, DC

I'd say .45, the more the merrier - but I don't know shit about guns Hell, go all out and get a revolver, those things are badass.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard