Poll

The Arab World will support...

Fatah, because a moderate stance wiill bring peace47%47% - 22
Hamas, because they perceive Fatah as Traitors52%52% - 24
Total: 46
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7045|132 and Bush

sergeriver wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Who are the traitors, Hamas or Fatah?  Should either of them get support other than humanitarian?
This whole thread came up while reading The Economist, where they suggested that those Arab leaders getting along with the US and Israel could be perceived by the rest of the Arab World as traitors, therefore the poll options.  Don't think of them with your logic, think what Arab people could think of them.  Like The Economist said a freedom fighter martyr sells more than a traitor.
I do try to see it from other perspectives. I try to get my news/stories from a variety of outlets. Such as this site  http://www.fromoccupiedpalestine.org/ Dragging innocents out in the street and executing them in front of their families is no freedom fighter. It's murder anyway you dress it up. Of course after the fact you hear...

" He insisted all had been released but admitted some summary executions happened during the fighting without authorisation.

'Hamas does not do that, but during the battle some men who were very hated for killing Hamas members were executed by the family members of their victims. We have put a stop to that, for it is wrong. Now any Fatah leader can return and will be safe.'"

A freedom fighter with remorse? Their executions actions must not have been that noble.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7202|Argentina

Kmarion wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Who are the traitors, Hamas or Fatah?  Should either of them get support other than humanitarian?
This whole thread came up while reading The Economist, where they suggested that those Arab leaders getting along with the US and Israel could be perceived by the rest of the Arab World as traitors, therefore the poll options.  Don't think of them with your logic, think what Arab people could think of them.  Like The Economist said a freedom fighter martyr sells more than a traitor.
I do try to see it from other perspectives. I try to get my news/stories from a variety of outlets. Such as this site  http://www.fromoccupiedpalestine.org/ Dragging innocents out in the street and executing them in front of their families is no freedom fighter. It's murder anyway you dress it up. Of course after the fact you hear...

" He insisted all had been released but admitted some summary executions happened during the fighting without authorisation.

'Hamas does not do that, but during the battle some men who were very hated for killing Hamas members were executed by the family members of their victims. We have put a stop to that, for it is wrong. Now any Fatah leader can return and will be safe.'"

A freedom fighter with remorse? Their executions actions must not have been that noble.
Hey, I don't support Hamas.  I just made the poll.  The Arabs may perceive them as freedom fighters, not us.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7045|132 and Bush

And the rest of us beat our heads against the wall trying to understand it .
Xbone Stormsurgezz
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7202|Argentina

Kmarion wrote:

And the rest of us beat our heads against the wall trying to understand it .
The world is way fucked up.
san4
The Mas
+311|7133|NYC, a place to live

sergeriver wrote:

There's a difference.  Palestine is the biggest concentration camp in the whole world.
It is the only "concentration camp" in the history of the world from which the inmates are free to contact the outside world, possess weapons, receive foreign aid, elect their own government, go to school, etc., etc. Not to mention that they can leave--not their first choice but not an option typically available to "concentration camp" inmates.
san4
The Mas
+311|7133|NYC, a place to live

sergeriver wrote:

Will the Arab World support Fatah?  Or will they perceive Fatah as traitors dealing with "the enemy" a.k.a. the West?
How can an Arab leader be friend with the Western nations without being labeled as a traitor by the rest of the Arab World?  Is it possible?
Is the radical freedom fighter image selling more than the moderate one among Arabs?
I have enough respect for the Palestinians to believe they will support any group that presents a realistic path to a decent peace. What the rest of the Arab world thinks is a different story...their agenda isn't necessarily to benefit the Palestinians.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7119|Canberra, AUS

too_money2007 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

too_money2007 wrote:

Anyways, I know you're upset that we have it so good over here.
But not quite so good as we have it here in Ireland...

too_money2007 wrote:

It's not my fault the middle east, and other 3rd world countries, haven't done anything in their history to make their lives better.
Wow. I never realised that! You learn something new everyday. I never realised stating the obvious could be so enlightening.

too_money2007 wrote:

They'd rather squabble over land rights in a conflict that is older than Jesus riding a dinosaur, than to just shut the fuck up and move on with their lives.
You're kind of exposing your ignorance of what is actually the issue in Palestine. It's a territorial dispute - land theft - not a religious dispute. It just so happens that the main protagonists can be characterised as either muslim or jewish.

too_money2007 wrote:

But, I can't blame them. Their parents brainwashed them into believing in some kind of God, which makes them insane. But, their parents aren't to blame, as each generation has done the same.
Try reading about the history of Palestine, 1900 to 1948. Then get back to me.

too_money2007 wrote:

Cam, I know you think you're a fking god here or something, but get a clue.
Given that I don't believe in the existence of a higher being I find it rather odd that you would suggest I thought of myself as a deity.

too_money2007 wrote:

Sit at your desk for the electric company and provide power to the masses, as that's all you're good for, other than inciting shit on a video gam
e forum, trying to impress 12 year olds with your stupid logic.
So what are you doing then?

too_money2007 wrote:

"I travel to other countries a lot, take lots of pictures to show people, so that makes me COOL!!" -CameronPoe (direct quote... it's out there).
Wow. I can make up quotes too. "I wish my mother would stop changing her lipstick, my dick's like a rainbow." -too_money2007 (direct quote... it's out there).
Thank you for proving my point that you HAVE to be right every time. You care entirely too much about the opinions of people on these forums. Also, do I detect a bit of anti-semitism? Yeah, I think you hate the Jews too, eh?
What... the... fuck...?

"You argued your case, therefore I HAVE to be right."

This is a fucking debate forum. Of course he cares about the opinions of others.

And where do you get the anti-Semitism charge from? The only time he mentioned jews was in:

"It just so happens that the main protagonists can be characterised as either muslim or jewish."

Where on earth is the anti-semitism in that?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|7000

CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:

where did i mention or imply genocide?   i meant that part of the reason for suffering in that part of the world is their own regimes.  you can indeed change regimes without killing the population.
Sorry. Misread.

CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:

might their lives be better if they had an actual stake in their country's wealth?  Why else should they be pissed off at the US and Israel?  Many of us in the west are so 'rich' in contrast to the average citizen in some of those countries.  why?  well, through hard work and the pull-up-by-bootstraps mentality we have here in the US.  you don't see a whole lot of that kind of attitude in the ME (outside of Israel).  if you did, i'm sure there would be more prosperity.  perhaps an Egyptian cell phone.  maybe a Saudi automobile.  but...no.
Instead of spreading out the large wealth sitting in the ground in those countries (which i argue should belong to the people), their govts keep the money for themselves, blame israel and the US for the public's problems (so the govt doesn't need to pay out those services) and the people for sure have a legitimate gripe here.  but...it's with the wrong people.  They should be complaining about their govt - not Israel or the US.

Further, these govts keep their people pretty ignorant to control them.  they do this by setting up maddrassas instead of setting up real universities and schools.  show me where in the Koran you can do torque or statics equations.  Show me in Koran where it says how to do titrations (chemistry) or triple integrals or Fast Fourier Transforms.  well, if you teach them to 'obey', 'obey' and 'obey' they don't get the idea to 'question' and take whatever their govt says to them as 'truth'.  isn't *that* subjugation...of the mind?

you avoided my main point on why these countries get a free pass for their treatment of their own people.  Why do these countries get a free pass for the way they treat women.  Why these countries get a free pass when it comes to multitudes of human rights abuses. 

You can cry all you want about 'but the US does the same stuff'.  ah...no.  no head cutting.  no honor killing.  no stoning (except at my old fraternity but that was differnt thing).  Some in Gitmo got better med care then they got in their home country.[/
Islamic culture is all about submission. Islam is 'submission to the will of allah'. The common psyche of the Islamic world is one of submission and reverence of those in charge. It is a very very different type of civilisation to the one we have in the west and I can't see how or why that would ever change. There is a lot to be said for their culture - it's far more fraternal than cut-throat capitalism for a start but is obviously easily abused by those who can capitalise on their subjects submissiveness.

Secular Iraq had a large middle class - doctors, lawyers, etc. That has been smashed in favour of characters like the Radical Sh'ia Cleric Moqtada Al Sadr, who now enjoys popular support there. Don't get me wrong, Saddam was a cunt, but if secularity can be smashed so easily it only leads me to believe that secularity is not really feasible in many middle eastern nations. The country that has come closest to best compromise between Islam and secularity is Iran. A democracy where women have the vote and universities produce a skilled and learned workforce but the tenets of Islam are respected. If America breaks Iran then you can forget about peace in the middle east forever, and you can forget about improving the international terrorism situation as a result. It would quite simply be game over. Iran represents the best half-way house model of government for all of the crackpot dictatorship ruined countries of the middle east. Change must come from within however. It cannot come from without. The politics of every country evolves around the actions of the people in that country and them alone otherwise you get forced, fragile, legitimacy-scarce government.

As for 'getting a free pass': the US gets a free pass on Guantanamo torture and illegal detainment centre, Ireland gets a free pass on pretending not to know the US is transporting abducted Afghans through our airports, France gets a free pass on discrimating against French citizens who happen to be second generation immigrants, Zimbabwe gets to starve its people to death, Myanmar gets to have keep the elected leader of the country under permanent house arrest - we all get free passes.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7119|Canberra, AUS
Hang on... what about Lebanon? UAE? Qatar? Or are they far too West-leaning to count?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7202|Argentina

san4 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

There's a difference.  Palestine is the biggest concentration camp in the whole world.
It is the only "concentration camp" in the history of the world from which the inmates are free to contact the outside world, possess weapons, receive foreign aid, elect their own government, go to school, etc., etc. Not to mention that they can leave--not their first choice but not an option typically available to "concentration camp" inmates.
Yeah, you are right.  The checkpoints thing, the IDF's patrolling, and the walls must be from a movie.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6667|Escea

Spark wrote:

Hang on... what about Lebanon? UAE? Qatar? Or are they far too West-leaning to count?
The UAE and Qatar have too much buisness with us, economic buisness of course.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|7000

Spark wrote:

Hang on... what about Lebanon? UAE? Qatar? Or are they far too West-leaning to count?
The UAE and Qatar are not democracies. When the oil runs out they'll return to infighting and self destruction. Lebanon is a democracy and look at the fucking state of it.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-06-27 07:18:51)

usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7206

CameronPoe wrote:

the US gets a free pass on Guantanamo torture and illegal detainment centre,
We do?  Could have fooled me.  Our own people want it closed for the most part, although closing it will not solve that problem.  But I do not see it as a free pass, it is just nobody can do anything about it.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|7006
So, nobody doing anything about it isn't a free pass how exactly?
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7206

Bubbalo wrote:

So, nobody doing anything about it isn't a free pass how exactly?
A free pass would imply it is ignored by the world and never talked about.  Now tell me that is the case.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7202|Argentina

usmarine2005 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

So, nobody doing anything about it isn't a free pass how exactly?
A free pass would imply it is ignored by the world and never talked about.  Now tell me that is the case.
A 5 day Hopper Pass for Disney?
=OBS= EstebanRey
Member
+256|6995|Oxford, England, UK, EU, Earth
Thankfully it is man that fails and not religion because if man followed religion to the letter we would live in a very horrid World.  People assume that the Bible only promotes good (by today's standards) but the old testament paints a murderous, callous and evil God who believes you can be killed for the smallest misdemeanours.
Mr.Dooomed
Find your center.
+752|6772

CameronPoe wrote:

Islamic culture is all about submission. Islam is 'submission to the will of allah'. The common psyche of the Islamic world is one of submission and reverence of those in charge. It is a very very different type of civilisation to the one we have in the west and I can't see how or why that would ever change. There is a lot to be said for their culture - it's far more fraternal than cut-throat capitalism for a start but is obviously easily abused by those who can capitalise on their subjects submissiveness.

Secular Iraq had a large middle class - doctors, lawyers, etc. That has been smashed in favour of characters like the Radical Sh'ia Cleric Moqtada Al Sadr, who now enjoys popular support there. Don't get me wrong, Saddam was a cunt, but if secularity can be smashed so easily it only leads me to believe that secularity is not really feasible in many middle eastern nations. The country that has come closest to best compromise between Islam and secularity is Iran. A democracy where women have the vote and universities produce a skilled and learned workforce but the tenets of Islam are respected. If America breaks Iran then you can forget about peace in the middle east forever, and you can forget about improving the international terrorism situation as a result. It would quite simply be game over. Iran represents the best half-way house model of government for all of the crackpot dictatorship ruined countries of the middle east. Change must come from within however. It cannot come from without. The politics of every country evolves around the actions of the people in that country and them alone otherwise you get forced, fragile, legitimacy-scarce government.

As for 'getting a free pass': the US gets a free pass on Guantanamo torture and illegal detainment centre, Ireland gets a free pass on pretending not to know the US is transporting abducted Afghans through our airports, France gets a free pass on discrimating against French citizens who happen to be second generation immigrants, Zimbabwe gets to starve its people to death, Myanmar gets to have keep the elected leader of the country under permanent house arrest - we all get free passes.
I've learned more about Islam and the state of the Middle East from you then I have from any other source I've cared to look in to. You have traveled to a lot of these Countries and you have spoken to a lot of people (Do you speak Arabic btw?) It's nice to hear your opinion on this situation and the many facts that you share with us. I really have sympathy for a lot of the Muslims situated in Palestine and the ones who are oppressed by Israel. It is a shame that the United States backs Israel.

I don't think Israel will ever become a dirty bomb waste land. Muslims WANT the land back, they don't want to destroy it, it is the third holiest place for all of Islam right? While Israel can be free to attack anybody around them cause its already a waste land as it is...I can see the Muslims dilemma..
Nature is a powerful force. Those who seek to subdue nature, never do so permanently.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7202|Argentina

Im_Dooomed wrote:

I don't think Israel will ever become a dirty bomb waste land. Muslims WANT the land back, they don't want to destroy it, it is the third holiest place for all of Islam right? While Israel can be free to attack anybody around them cause its already a waste land as it is...I can see the Muslims dilemma..
Jerusalem is, not the rest of Israel.  So, I wouldn't be so sure about someone trying to destroy Israel.  That could happen indeed.  And that wouldn't be the solution of course.  They need to think in a 2 - 3? states solution.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard