Do high ranks necessarily make good players?

2007-06-29 15:03:50

#1

AtomicMoose: Member; +18|6664

Yeah. So pretty much as the title says. Does a player of a huge rank necessarily own the world, or have you just walked into the same noob who gets 10 points a round every round for 4 years and is now God-Master-General of the internet, but still plays like a smacktard? Discuss.

P.S. I couldn't find any similar topic but if someone points one out to me, I'll get rid of this.

2007-06-29 15:05:32

#2

Lucien: Fantasma Parastasie; +1,451|6917

*face-to-desk action*

2007-06-29 15:05:34

#3

The_killer2: hai; +36|6440|North Carolina

No i have flew with generals and colonels who couldn't even use the tv missile.

2007-06-29 15:06:36

#4

RAVENMkXV: Member; +9|6480|Florida

lol idk to me this seems so obvious. the answer is NO. ive seen some 4 star generals taht just
plain suck. people could also just make 2nd account...like my friend Blades who is like a Sgt. with
a 22.1 ratio as aviator. Rank means nothin, BF2 is gettin old and its quite ez to just make a 2nd account
or just whore ur stats. Ex. medic whores have no freakin skill in inf. combat or even when it comes to air to air
combat

2007-06-29 15:06:59

#5

JoshCooper: Member; +20|6593|Stoke

i think in general a high rank will mean a better player just becuase they have the experience nd hopfuly sum common sense bt as ive seen there r also some smaktard high ranks bt tht mite jst be becuase they tink they have a high rank so can be a smaktard

2007-06-29 15:07:38

#6

Trigger_Happy_92: Uses the TV missle too much; +394|6914

Matt^ wrote:
No i have flew with generals and colonels who couldn't even use the tv missile.

2007-06-29 15:08:34

#7

Apoc-SAS: rebmeM; +39|6652|Scotland

The best players i have played against in armor, heli's, infantry and jets have been lower ranks than me but generally the higher ranks are better. Obviously through experience.

2007-06-29 15:09:30

#8

Balok77: Member; +28|6412

In my clan most of the player on about 60,000 points play better than the ones with 150,000, rank does not always reflect skill

2007-06-29 15:13:34

#9

WinterWayfarer: Combat Medic; +21|6516|Spacetime

Rank is basically just how many hours someone has played. Experience in the game comes with time so I guess you could say that higher ranks may be more skillful than recent starters.

2007-06-29 15:19:10

#10

iPoon.be: Internet Poon; +145|6793|Belgium

From a certain point on, you can expect a player to know how to play bf2. Generals arent generally (no pun intended) better than sgt. majors: either they have learned to play the game by 50k points, or they just suck.

2007-06-29 15:20:37

#11

farmerfez: o wut?; +78|6794

JoshCooper wrote:
i think in general a high rank will mean a better player just becuase they have the experience nd hopfuly sum common sense bt as ive seen there r also some smaktard high ranks bt tht mite jst be becuase they tink they have a high rank so can be a smaktard

english please?

2007-06-29 15:20:38

#12

Dr.Red-Eye: fanneh; +64|6958|Ireland

SargeV1.4 wrote:
*face-to-desk action*

wow ur so cool

2007-06-29 15:20:38

#13

Jamesey: I HATE you; +26|6419|Scotland!

Ex. medic whores have no freakin skill in inf. combat

LOL

Your most used kit is medic, which you're not that good at. And you're not allowed to beg for karma in your sig. gg

Last edited by Jamesey (2007-06-29 15:21:53)

2007-06-29 15:29:46

#14

{uscm}Jyden: You likey leaky?; +433|6943|In You Endo- Stoke

It depends what they have been doing to achieve there high rank.

Some of the top players just stuck at one thing,say medic whore on karkand.

Rank means to me time spent playing the game,there we always be people shit at something.. or just having and off day.

2007-06-29 15:36:26

#15

3lmo: Don't Hassel the Hoff; +345|6567|The | Netherlands

Yes.

2007-06-29 15:43:00

#16

JamesGold: Member; +18|6720

People with higher ranks, in nearly all cases, are better players (point wise). And how else are we going to judge a player's skill if it's not by points? Just look at the scoreboard some time - the team with the shinier rank symbols wins. Sure, someone can start another account, but that's not the heart of the question here. Those who start another account with experience on their previous one should have both the stats on both the accounts added up.

2007-06-29 15:43:17

#17

BeerzGod: Hooray Beer!; +94|6834|United States

Rank honestly means nothing. Rank usually just shows how long the person has been playing and how many points they have accumulated. At the same time, however, higher ranks usually mean the player is a bit better than lower ranked people, but that is certainly not always the case. Some people just don't get the hang of the game, and while they may have the highest rank, in reality, they are mediocre at best. I personally will team with higher ranked people more so than lower ranked because they SHOULD be better... having played the game long enough to reach that rank... they should have a lot more experience. But I think it's about 50/50.

2007-06-29 15:46:47

#18

Ottomania: Troll has returned.; +62|6785|Istanbul-Turkey

as a general myself when I give a break playing bf2 I play very bad. who plays continuously is better.

2007-06-29 15:50:44

#19

Lucien: Fantasma Parastasie; +1,451|6917

Dr.Red-Eye wrote:
SargeV1.4 wrote:
*face-to-desk action*
wow ur so cool

why thank you. You are mildly chilled too. care for a cookie?

2007-06-29 15:55:36

#20

Dr_3V|L: Member; +51|6989|Twente, The Netherlands

Reading stuff like this before going to sleep is so calming, for various comic reasons.

2007-06-29 15:56:11

#21

daddyofdeath: A REAL Combat Engineer in the house; +187|6517|UK Bradford W,Yorks. Age 27

Of course they do. They are skilled in most all aspects of weaponry/tactics/teamwork of the game. Practice=high rank and points/ Its simple, get the rank get the skill get the respect.

2007-06-29 15:59:56

#22

SteikeTa: Member; +153|7012|Norway/Norwegen/ Norge/Noruega

Rank means everything. Everyone who is under me in rank is worse. It is so true. And this has been discussed before. A lot of times I believe.

2007-06-29 16:02:33

#23

irishtop: Hopscotch Champion; +11|6427|Houston, Texas

well since high rank is a vague statement what do most consider a high rank like above 2nd leuitenant, captain, colonel or w/e.

2007-06-29 16:08:33

#24

loonitic: ...is a potty mouth; +286|6799|Valhalla

Some are some aren't. I have flown with some Generals that are fucking awesome pilots and against some that are pure toss. A few weeks ago I was fighting with a 3 star gen on some infantry only and I had to revive him 15 times in row because he was just a little wank and could not kill anybody

2007-06-29 16:08:41

#25

daddyofdeath: A REAL Combat Engineer in the house; +187|6517|UK Bradford W,Yorks. Age 27

It truly does mean play more then rank up and own. Some low rankers plus high rankers definitely use hax to get high scores. This part of gameplay is shit. But the majority of high rankers really do play the game well.

BF2S Forums Do high ranks necessarily make good players?

Matt^ wrote:

JoshCooper wrote:

SargeV1.4 wrote:

Dr.Red-Eye wrote:

SargeV1.4 wrote:

Board footer