hmmmm....
prove this wrong:
you can prove this statement wrong.
prove this wrong:
you can prove this statement wrong.
Proving this wrong ?:
My BF2 name is Lieutenant_Jensen .
My BF2 name is Lieutenant_Jensen .
BUT, Pi goes on forever, it never ends. Therefor, you can't accurately/technically multiply it but itself or something else.I0973 wrote:
x can be anything but x X x is still x^2xBlackPantherx wrote:
Not if "x" is Pi. I don't think.I0973 wrote:
so here is another one (correctly done)
(x+25)(x+3)= x^2 ( copy and pasting squared doesnt work: /) +28x+75
I already tried that but I remember someone proving me wrong, I forgot what though. lolLieutenant_Jensen wrote:
Proving this wrong ?:
My BF2 name is Lieutenant_Jensen .
if u notice on the score board everyones bf2 name actualy has 2 spaces behind it so ur name is really [ ]Lieutenant_JensenLieutenant_Jensen wrote:
Proving this wrong ?:
My BF2 name is Lieutenant_Jensen .
I'd rather just go for the whole, "Lieutenant Jensen" is just what you perceive. It's actually a bunch of 0's and 1's because its in Binary code.elite3444 wrote:
if u notice on the score board everyones bf2 name actually has 2 spaces behind it so ur name is really [ ]Lieutenant_JensenLieutenant_Jensen wrote:
Proving this wrong ?:
My BF2 name is Lieutenant_Jensen .
not really ... his bf name is still Lieutenet_Jensen you can not call someone space, space Lieutenant underscore Jensen so special character dont really count
but it is still his BF name. the name that he is called by in BF to people not to the computerxBlackPantherx wrote:
I'd rather just go for the whole, "Lieutenant Jensen" is just what you perceive. It's actually a bunch of 0's and 1's because its in Binary code.elite3444 wrote:
if u notice on the score board everyones bf2 name actually has 2 spaces behind it so ur name is really [ ]Lieutenant_JensenLieutenant_Jensen wrote:
Proving this wrong ?:
My BF2 name is Lieutenant_Jensen .
the sun will reach a point where it will run out of Hydrogen
Yes, but two things.I0973 wrote:
but it is still his BF name. the name that he is called by in BF to people not to the computerxBlackPantherx wrote:
I'd rather just go for the whole, "Lieutenant Jensen" is just what you perceive. It's actually a bunch of 0's and 1's because its in Binary code.elite3444 wrote:
if u notice on the score board everyones bf2 name actually has 2 spaces behind it so ur name is really [ ]Lieutenant_Jensen
1) People calling him Lieutenant Jensen just because he simply gave the COMPUTER the command on how many 0's and 1's to get what he perceives as Lieutenant Jensen. OTHER people type in a series of 0's and 1's commands to call him Lieutenant Jensen.
2) They are sending the message calling him Lieutenant Jensen to his computer HOPING that the person working the computer gets the message.
Ummm, I'll use some things used before.Balok77 wrote:
the sun will reach a point where it will run out of Hydrogen
1) This is wrong, you did not specify which sun. As far as we know there could be 'everlasting suns'.
2) This will not happen in any of our life times so you can not prove this to be a fact.
3) Hydrogen is just something you perceive as a single object when in fact it is many MANY things smaller than an atom which we still can not see (as far as I know).
4) Hmmmmm, not if we, as idiotic humans, create enough anti-matter that gets in the wrong hands and they make the sun "disappear" before it gets a chance to run out of hydrogen.
One of those should prove that wrong.
but someone could call him leutenant jenson in real life when they are talking about BF2 so that would be his BF2 name
thanks. its like saying leather jackets are made from cows.NooBesT wrote:
Yes it is.Bruce-SuperNub wrote:
Thats still not proving me wrong since you admitted wood does come from tree's.mkxiii wrote:
wood is not made out of trees, it is made out of part of a tree, not the whole thing, as would is not made out of leaves or fruit
You said that it comes out from tree's meaning whole tree which in fact isn't the case. Like mkxiii said not whole tree is used to make wood so therfore you are wrong.
mkxiii wrote:
thanks. its like saying leather jackets are made from cows.NooBesT wrote:
Yes it is.Bruce-SuperNub wrote:
Thats still not proving me wrong since you admitted wood does come from tree's.
You said that it comes out from tree's meaning whole tree which in fact isn't the case. Like mkxiii said not whole tree is used to make wood so therfore you are wrong.
duhhh
Due to popular demand:Lieutenant_Jensen wrote:
Proving this wrong ?:
My BF2 name is Lieutenant_Jensen .
In BF2 it's not written in bold letters, so therefore this statement is false.
I was thinking the same thing...his name isn't b]Lieutenant_Jensen[/b], it's Lieutenant_Jensen.NooBesT wrote:
Due to popular demand:Lieutenant_Jensen wrote:
Proving this wrong ?:
My BF2 name is Lieutenant_Jensen .
In BF2 it's not written in bold letters, so therefore this statement is false.
argh you should be able to turn off BBcode..
nice, obviously leather as wellrobthemadman wrote:
http://www.thelabrat.com/images/cow.jpgmkxiii wrote:
thanks. its like saying leather jackets are made from cows.NooBesT wrote:
Yes it is.
You said that it comes out from tree's meaning whole tree which in fact isn't the case. Like mkxiii said not whole tree is used to make wood so therfore you are wrong.
duhhh
So you can make assumptions from what i say because you found a way to prove it wrong? I said "wood comes from tree's" You said "only parts of tree's are used" thus, still making it come from tree's.
Last edited by Bruce-SuperNub (2007-07-01 07:45:50)
Bruce-SuperNub wrote:
because you found a way to prove it wrong.
But you implied that it came from everything in trees.Bruce-SuperNub wrote:
So you can make assumptions from what i say because you found a way to prove it wrong? I said "wood comes from tree's" You said "only parts of tree's are used" thus, still making it come from tree's.
World of Warcraft is not for noobs
Gotcha
Gotcha
I bet there's at least one non-noob in the millions who play World of Warcraft. Besides Blizzard didn't develop a game JUST for noobs. They made it for large scale audience so they would get more money.Whitey wrote:
World of Warcraft is not for noobs
Gotcha
Fine -.-
Again I claim-------------> Time does not stop....
I would love to if you can prove this wrong.
I would love to if you can prove this wrong.
ever drink?SmkenRez wrote:
Again I claim-------------> Time does not stop....
I would love to if you can prove this wrong.