Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7138

http://content.zdnet.com/2346-9595_22-67546-1.html

Pictured here in a recent training exercise is the program's Class I unmanned aerial vehicle; the UAV is intended to help dismounted soldiers with reconnaissance, surveillance and target acquisition.

SUGV controlled by 360 controlpad: http://content.zdnet.com/2346-9595_22-67546-9.html

Edit: Damn, how do you link images?  LOL, dislexia on the title.

Last edited by Ilocano (2007-07-02 16:53:58)

Mr.Dooomed
Find your center.
+752|6799

that little thing wont stand up to an AK-47 so /fail.
Nature is a powerful force. Those who seek to subdue nature, never do so permanently.
ReDevilJR
Member
+106|6822

Im_Dooomed wrote:

that little thing wont stand up to an AK-47 so /fail.
No US Soldier Deaths. That's the reason why... Not putting humans at risk...
Twist
Too old to be doing this sh*t
+103|6994|Little blue planet, milky way
First of all.... That thing'll NEVER fly... No wings or rotors means no way to keep it up, and if a soldier is needed to throw it into the air everytime you need a picture, I'd much prefer an awacs or a UCAV overhead... Or even a HUMINT resource on ground.

However. ReDevilJR is right about the "no soldier deaths". 70 years ago wars were fought overseas and noone knew anything except that now the troops had takken el alamein (or whatever), and usually people didn't know THAT untill days or even WEEKS later. Today war is transmitted on open air. Live TV straight from the front line, sometimes straight from the soldiers night cams, or the missles nosecam. INSTANT information. And while people today may not be as easily riled as they were 70 years ago. That tough hide that comes from watching too much death on TV doesn't mean that people dont care if it's their neighbour, friend, son, daughter, sister, mother, father, cousin or even a casual aquaintance of your wifes hairdressers' cousins' boss's mechanics son.
People CARE about their own getting killed. And modern day combat is being transmitted straight to our TV set over breakfast. So the governments of today will have to find a way to avoid casualties. One is to avoid armed conflict, however, this isn't feasible. So the other choice is to avoid direct combat. But in situations where you need a ground pressence, soldiers are (still) required.

However, there's so many nice and automated fighting systems in existance. And the ONLY reason they're not used is because these systems do NOT differentiate between a friendly and an unfriendly target if it's not transmitting an IFF. So why dont we just insert drones to fight every single war, and let god sort them out ? Simple, it's not going to look good on the morning news either that one country has just commited genocide in another country. If it was that simple, then the problem might as well have been solved with a nuclear bomb or two.

In essense: Soldiers die because people want their morning news over breakfast, and no amount of gadgets will fix that in the next 50 years.
MAGUIRE93
High Angle Hell
+182|6665|Schofield Barracks
me+360 controller+lil robot with gun=pwn
some_random_panda
Flamesuit essential
+454|6862

Twist wrote:

First of all.... That thing'll NEVER fly... No wings or rotors means no way to keep it up, and if a soldier is needed to throw it into the air everytime you need a picture, I'd much prefer an awacs or a UCAV overhead... Or even a HUMINT resource on ground.
How do you know it can't fly?  There could be rotors internally, and you wouldn't need wings if you balanced them correctly.
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7138

Twist wrote:

... and no amount of gadgets will fix that in the next 50 years.
True.  But if it can reduce deaths, so much the better.

Check out the second pics yellow text : "keep clear of fan".  Definitely looks like a fan to me.  Durability and noise are probably issues at this point though.

Last edited by Ilocano (2007-07-02 17:23:07)

Machine_Madness
Madness has now come over me
+20|6908|Brisbane, Australia

MAGUIRE93 wrote:

me+360 controller+lil robot with gun=pwn
what happens when you go against an enemy like that?




I like the this whole unmanned thing for military technology.....but if the enemy has this capability.....it would be a war of just robots.
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7314|Alberta, Canada

Machine_Madness wrote:

I like the this whole unmanned thing for military technology.....but if the enemy has this capability.....it would be a war of just robots.
Exactly. And then eventually, the enemy will locate our position of control by UAV and then blow us up by some nuclear robot.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard