U ARE kidding right?? Like thats ever gonna happen.
so just for the record, do you advocate staying out of the Darfur crisis because it's not our problem?CameronPoe wrote:
Afraid not. Otherwise people would be taking proper action in Zimbabwe, Myanmar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and numerous other places. I appreciate your sentiment but frankly it's BS.KnowMeByTrailOfDead wrote:
Humanity is the humans responsibility. Fostering genocide through inaction is reprehensible.CameronPoe wrote:
Not your fault. Not your responsibility. Vietnam is the Vietnamese' responsibility. Cambodia is the Cambodians' responsibility. Neither threatened the US.
The Tsunami of a few years ago didn't hit the US, so should we have even got involved?
So true....GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
hey, the same guys you consider terrorist, so do we. Just Turkey might over step their boundaries a bit with the rest of the Kurds...not like they have a history of it or anything_1_MAN-ARMY.17 wrote:
i dont care about Armenians i care about the damn terroristsGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
maybe they could go kill some more Armenians
They wouldn't do it these days though (not blatantly anyway). They're trying to be on best behaviour to get better relations with the west (and maybe EU membership).
I agree with you CaptainSpaulding71 +1. Its this attitude that let the Hitler get power.CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
so just for the record, do you advocate staying out of the Darfur crisis because it's not our problem?
The Tsunami of a few years ago didn't hit the US, so should we have even got involved?
No it isn't. The point when people should've intervened with Hitler was when he annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia. Domestic issues, not our concern. Messing with them causes more problems than get solved.Harmor wrote:
I agree with you CaptainSpaulding71 +1. Its this attitude that let the Hitler get power.CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
so just for the record, do you advocate staying out of the Darfur crisis because it's not our problem?
The Tsunami of a few years ago didn't hit the US, so should we have even got involved?
Once shit spills over international borders - then it needs sorting out.
Thanks Bert for saving me the bother of repeating myself again.Bertster7 wrote:
No it isn't. The point when people should've intervened with Hitler was when he annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia. Domestic issues, not our concern. Messing with them causes more problems than get solved.Harmor wrote:
I agree with you CaptainSpaulding71 +1. Its this attitude that let the Hitler get power.CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:
so just for the record, do you advocate staying out of the Darfur crisis because it's not our problem?
The Tsunami of a few years ago didn't hit the US, so should we have even got involved?
Once shit spills over international borders - then it needs sorting out.
very good point and makes sense, but, wouldnt that have just started WW2 earlier?CameronPoe wrote:
Thanks Bert for saving me the bother of repeating myself again.Bertster7 wrote:
No it isn't. The point when people should've intervened with Hitler was when he annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia. Domestic issues, not our concern. Messing with them causes more problems than get solved.Harmor wrote:
I agree with you CaptainSpaulding71 +1. Its this attitude that let the Hitler get power.
Once shit spills over international borders - then it needs sorting out.
Well it should have started when Germany annexed Austria (or at the very least when they annexed the Sudetenland), I think most people would agree with that.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
very good point and makes sense, but, wouldnt that have just started WW2 earlier?
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-07-05 15:36:27)
Wouldn't that have been a good thing?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
very good point and makes sense, but, wouldnt that have just started WW2 earlier?CameronPoe wrote:
Thanks Bert for saving me the bother of repeating myself again.Bertster7 wrote:
No it isn't. The point when people should've intervened with Hitler was when he annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia. Domestic issues, not our concern. Messing with them causes more problems than get solved.
Once shit spills over international borders - then it needs sorting out.
Would've ruined the whole Blitzkreig idea.
so do you go to the doctor to get a tetanus shot good for five years or wait until you step on a nail and hope for the best?Bertster7 wrote:
Wouldn't that have been a good thing?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
very good point and makes sense, but, wouldnt that have just started WW2 earlier?CameronPoe wrote:
Thanks Bert for saving me the bother of repeating myself again.
Would've ruined the whole Blitzkreig idea.