http://www.bestpricecameras.com/prodeta … ;display=2
or should i just purchase the body ($330) and a lens or two separately?
or should i just purchase the body ($330) and a lens or two separately?
because i want to take good pictures. i want to break into amateur photography, and you don't use a point and shoot for that.Andoura wrote:
Well do you rly need a camera like that???
Because for something aroud 200 and 300$ you could have a very good digital camera ...
Last edited by Ender2309 (2007-07-05 22:09:10)
sure there is. i can get the same camera body (just the physical camera, no lenses or gear or anything) from the same site for around 250 apparently. normally this camera retails for about 5-700 though, so I'm a bit worried it might be a scam. lenses and a memory card and case are going to run me up to about the same cost, if not more, which is why i'm asking.FarBeyondReality wrote:
Hm, seems quite nice for a camera tbh, im no expert tho.
But isnt there another camera with for ex. less features? Not about the lens, focus and mega pixels i was mainly thinking about the 2GB memory, tripods etc? would get it a bit cheaper but then again you might need those
Otherwise, since you're the editor for the newspaper I guess you'll be taking pics every now and then but are you gonna use it for like anything else? If not then wouldnt it be wiser to get a cheaper but still powerfull camera so you're not spending cash on something you wont use to the fullest?
Thats the things I was thinking, dunno if I helped or not ^^