Liberal-Sl@yer
Certified BF2S Asshole
+131|6899|The edge of sanity

CNN wrote:

Liberal efforts to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine are "completely on track," and Democrats intend to push for the measure by linking talk radio to "hate crimes," according to a conservative media analyst.

Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) has proposed an amendment to appropriations legislation to prevent the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from spending any money in 2008 to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine

Personally, I think this whole fairness doctrine is bullshit. They want to stop talk radio because conservatives own the airways. Fairness doctrine is codename for goverment control of free speech.

Discuss
blisteringsilence
I'd rather hunt with Cheney than ride with Kennedy
+83|7145|Little Rock, Arkansas
I agree with you completely. This, in my opinion, is an undue restriction on free speech. If you don't like what's being said, change the channel. If you aren't cool with that, start your own radio station.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6992|San Diego, CA, USA
OMG if that was true every post I made would be rebutted by CameronPoe!
jonsimon
Member
+224|6938
Yeah, that's crap. I don't like retards spouting shit on the airwaves, but that's why I don't listen to them. Sure, some hate crimes might find their motivation there, but so long as a radio show does not qualify as incitement to violence it does not violate free speech.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6992|San Diego, CA, USA
There's no point for the 'Unfairness' Doctrine because there are plenty of outlets now.  When the law was first introduced there was a very few outlets.

I think this comes on the heal of the success Talk Radio had in inspiring the base of the conservatives to stop the flawed Immigration Bill.

And the fact that Air America, a liberally based Talk Radio station, can't penetrate the market.
blisteringsilence
I'd rather hunt with Cheney than ride with Kennedy
+83|7145|Little Rock, Arkansas

jonsimon wrote:

Yeah, that's crap. I don't like retards spouting shit on the airwaves, but that's why I don't listen to them. Sure, some hate crimes might find their motivation there, but so long as a radio show does not qualify as incitement to violence it does not violate free speech.
But there's no such thing as a hate crime. You punish actions, not thoughts. All crimes have hate involved.
Miller
IT'S MILLER TIME!
+271|7199|United States of America

blisteringsilence wrote:

If you aren't cool with that, start your own radio station.
They do, then go bankrupt within two days.
Home
Section.80
+447|7291|Seattle, Washington, USA

Yeah, that impedes on free speech. You don't have to give information in a balanced manner if you don't want to. Besides, if this was put into effect, what would happen to "The Daily Show" and Fox "News"?
jonsimon
Member
+224|6938

blisteringsilence wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

Yeah, that's crap. I don't like retards spouting shit on the airwaves, but that's why I don't listen to them. Sure, some hate crimes might find their motivation there, but so long as a radio show does not qualify as incitement to violence it does not violate free speech.
But there's no such thing as a hate crime. You punish actions, not thoughts. All crimes have hate involved.
Not necessarily. Money is often a motivator independent of hate. Regardless though, we punish the means, not the motive.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6848|North Carolina
The "Fairness Doctrine" sounds about as fair as the "Fair Tax."  I understand the ideological principle behind this proposal, but it is definitely a violation of the First Amendment.

For what it's worth though...  it is very sad that what sells best in most media is material that is heavily slanted, whether it's a liberal, conservative, or some other bias.

People are often far more interested in commentary than facts....
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7205

Nobody wants to listen to liberals on the radio.  Why can't they just do something about it instead of crying?
RedTwizzler
I do it for the lulz.
+124|6980|Chicago

Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:

CNN wrote:

Liberal efforts to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine are "completely on track," and Democrats intend to push for the measure by linking talk radio to "hate crimes," according to a conservative media analyst.

Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) has proposed an amendment to appropriations legislation to prevent the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from spending any money in 2008 to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine

Personally, I think this whole fairness doctrine is bullshit. They want to stop talk radio because conservatives own the airways. Fairness doctrine is codename for goverment control of free speech.

Discuss
But the Patriot Act is cool.


-_-
CaptainSpaulding71
Member
+119|6800|CA, USA

usmarine2005 wrote:

Nobody wants to listen to liberals on the radio.  Why can't they just do something about it instead of crying?
why don't more people want to hear liberals on the radio?  why was Air America a colossal failure?  Is there a market for this stuff in Omaha or Bloomington or Springfield, Tuscon, Bend, Tallahassee?  I can see SF and LA perhaps.

Why are Hannity, Rush, Glen Beck, Michael Savage, etc doing so well? 

Unfortunately i haven't heard Air America (in its short life) but i have seen some other liberal leaning media and to me it just seems 'whiny'.  i hear alot of people complaining but not really offering concrete solutions that solve the problems.  Bitterness.  Seething hatred for Bush.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7205

CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Nobody wants to listen to liberals on the radio.  Why can't they just do something about it instead of crying?
why don't more people want to hear liberals on the radio?  why was Air America a colossal failure?  Is there a market for this stuff in Omaha or Bloomington or Springfield, Tuscon, Bend, Tallahassee?  I can see SF and LA perhaps.

Why are Hannity, Rush, Glen Beck, Michael Savage, etc doing so well? 

Unfortunately i haven't heard Air America (in its short life) but i have seen some other liberal leaning media and to me it just seems 'whiny'.  i hear alot of people complaining but not really offering concrete solutions that solve the problems.  Bitterness.  Seething hatred for Bush.
It's like I tell the people under me.  I do not want to hear bitching.  Bitching to me is "This fucking sucks" or "this is stupid" and that's it...no solution.

IF you think something is fucking stupid by all means say so, I want you to.  But give me a damn solution also.
CaptainSpaulding71
Member
+119|6800|CA, USA

usmarine2005 wrote:

CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Nobody wants to listen to liberals on the radio.  Why can't they just do something about it instead of crying?
why don't more people want to hear liberals on the radio?  why was Air America a colossal failure?  Is there a market for this stuff in Omaha or Bloomington or Springfield, Tuscon, Bend, Tallahassee?  I can see SF and LA perhaps.

Why are Hannity, Rush, Glen Beck, Michael Savage, etc doing so well? 

Unfortunately i haven't heard Air America (in its short life) but i have seen some other liberal leaning media and to me it just seems 'whiny'.  i hear alot of people complaining but not really offering concrete solutions that solve the problems.  Bitterness.  Seething hatred for Bush.
It's like I tell the people under me.  I do not want to hear bitching.  Bitching to me is "This fucking sucks" or "this is stupid" and that's it...no solution.

IF you think something is fucking stupid by all means say so, I want you to.  But give me a damn solution also.
Yes sir, my brother!  indeed.  actions speak louder than words.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6848|North Carolina

CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Nobody wants to listen to liberals on the radio.  Why can't they just do something about it instead of crying?
why don't more people want to hear liberals on the radio?  why was Air America a colossal failure?  Is there a market for this stuff in Omaha or Bloomington or Springfield, Tuscon, Bend, Tallahassee?  I can see SF and LA perhaps.

Why are Hannity, Rush, Glen Beck, Michael Savage, etc doing so well? 

Unfortunately i haven't heard Air America (in its short life) but i have seen some other liberal leaning media and to me it just seems 'whiny'.  i hear alot of people complaining but not really offering concrete solutions that solve the problems.  Bitterness.  Seething hatred for Bush.
*shrugs*  All I have to say is....  I'm liberal, and I have solutions.  So do many Democrats and moderates.  I would say that the markets you listed are the key though.  Talk Radio is generally aimed at suburbs and rural areas -- which are typically Republican territory.  Most liberals are urban, although there are some liberal suburbs out there.

Plus, entertainment on TV is generally liberal, because most screenwriters tend to be liberal.  Most movies are liberal because most directors are as well.

It's really just a difference in markets.  Conservatives have talk radio and talk TV, liberals have film and entertainment TV in general.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7205

So why doesn't America want to listen to liberal radio?

Don't give me that market BS Turq.  Sat radio, internet, pod cast, mp3, etc.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6848|North Carolina

usmarine2005 wrote:

So why doesn't America want to listen to liberal radio?

Don't give me that market BS Turq.  Sat radio, internet, pod cast, mp3, etc.
It's not BS, because it's proven by sales.  I honestly never listened to Air America, so I can't comment on its quality or lack thereof.

Yet...  that's also part of it.  I don't know many liberals who have an interest in talk radio.  If I want to hear liberal commentary, I listen to Olbermann or Bill Maher.  Or...  I watch a Michael Moore movie.

Also, the Daily Show is liberal as well, and The Colbert Report makes fun of conservatism.  So, as you can see, there is no need for a liberal market in talk radio.  There are plenty of alternatives.

In addition to this, there is the inherent assumption that all talk radio is conservative, so liberals aren't likely to look for a liberal talk radio program, which in turn, makes it difficult for a liberal show to survive.

So yes, it's totally about the market.
Blehm98
conservative hatemonger
+150|6907|meh-land

CaptainSpaulding71 wrote:

Unfortunately i haven't heard Air America (in its short life) but i have seen some other liberal leaning media and to me it just seems 'whiny'.  i hear alot of people complaining but not really offering concrete solutions that solve the problems.  Bitterness.  Seething hatred for Bush.
they've been around for a while, i had the mispleasure of accidentally tuning in once and hearing Jerry Springer doing his show, which, by some strange reversal of the universe, tries to do what Dr. Laura's show does lol...  Offering life advice...  please
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7205

Turquoise wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

So why doesn't America want to listen to liberal radio?

Don't give me that market BS Turq.  Sat radio, internet, pod cast, mp3, etc.
It's not BS, because it's proven by sales.  I honestly never listened to Air America, so I can't comment on its quality or lack thereof.

Yet...  that's also part of it.  I don't know many liberals who have an interest in talk radio.  If I want to hear liberal commentary, I listen to Olbermann or Bill Maher.  Or...  I watch a Michael Moore movie.

Also, the Daily Show is liberal as well, and The Colbert Report makes fun of conservatism.  So, as you can see, there is no need for a liberal market in talk radio.  There are plenty of alternatives.

In addition to this, there is the inherent assumption that all talk radio is conservative, so liberals aren't likely to look for a liberal talk radio program, which in turn, makes it difficult for a liberal show to survive.

So yes, it's totally about the market.
Just from my experience, I watch Countdown with Keith on MSNBC.  I have watched it for a while because it is way better than O'Rly or whatever crap is on CNN.  But I am starting not to watch it.  All he does is bash and bitch about FOX and Bill O.  That is how you lose viewers who do not have a "party."
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7205

And what do you mean by market Turq?  Most stations are in the city and get filtered to the burbs.  I can pick up Cleveland radio here in Columbus.  So I do not buy what you are saying.......or understand completely.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6848|North Carolina

usmarine2005 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

So why doesn't America want to listen to liberal radio?

Don't give me that market BS Turq.  Sat radio, internet, pod cast, mp3, etc.
It's not BS, because it's proven by sales.  I honestly never listened to Air America, so I can't comment on its quality or lack thereof.

Yet...  that's also part of it.  I don't know many liberals who have an interest in talk radio.  If I want to hear liberal commentary, I listen to Olbermann or Bill Maher.  Or...  I watch a Michael Moore movie.

Also, the Daily Show is liberal as well, and The Colbert Report makes fun of conservatism.  So, as you can see, there is no need for a liberal market in talk radio.  There are plenty of alternatives.

In addition to this, there is the inherent assumption that all talk radio is conservative, so liberals aren't likely to look for a liberal talk radio program, which in turn, makes it difficult for a liberal show to survive.

So yes, it's totally about the market.
Just from my experience, I watch Countdown with Keith on MSNBC.  I have watched it for a while because it is way better than O'Rly or whatever crap is on CNN.  But I am starting not to watch it.  All he does is bash and bitch about FOX and Bill O.  That is how you lose viewers who do not have a "party."
Keith Olbermann is obviously liberal, and he can be snide at times, but overall, he makes some good points.

But yes, his focus on only the wrongdoings of the right (and not of the left) undoubtedly turns off some people.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6848|North Carolina

usmarine2005 wrote:

And what do you mean by market Turq?  Most stations are in the city and get filtered to the burbs.  I can pick up Cleveland radio here in Columbus.  So I do not buy what you are saying.......or understand completely.
Well, think about this.  If it's already assumed that talk radio is conservative, then conservatives (urban, rural, or otherwise) will tune in to whatever show is in the area.  If viewership is high enough, ad revenue starts coming in.  If talk radio was already assumed to be liberal, the same would occur with the left.  It's only a matter of how conservatives got into this market before liberals, and they've done a good job of keeping their colleagues interested in listening.

As long as this conservative image prevails, liberals will turn their attention to other markets.  And as I said before, the liberal entertainment available on TV and film already sates this market thoroughly.

That's all it is man.  There's no big secret to this.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7205

But you pass it off as being "assumed."  I call it failure on the lib part, not assumption by the public.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6848|North Carolina

usmarine2005 wrote:

But you pass it off as being "assumed."  I call it failure on the lib part, not assumption by the public.
I see perception as one of the primary determinants of a product's success.  This is why advertising is so important.  I'd never even heard of Air America until it was well into its broadcasting.  It would seem that they didn't advertise well enough to draw in their market.

Now, it's quite possible that Franken, Garofalo, and co. just didn't provide interesting material either.  I wouldn't know, because again, I didn't listen to it.

But to say there isn't a market for liberal commentary is rather....  unobservant.  If that was true, then Michael Moore would be as poor as he dresses.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard