I don't see what was wrong with the title but ok...Scorpion0x17 wrote:
You in a bad mood today?Kmarion wrote:
I fixed your thread title. Click here to find out why.
karma requesting...Hurricane wrote:
I don't see what was wrong with the title but ok...Scorpion0x17 wrote:
You in a bad mood today?Kmarion wrote:
I fixed your thread title. Click here to find out why.
(and, no, I don't think deathunlimited was actually requesting karma either, if that's what you mean - I think he (deathunlimited) was pointing out that chicks in sigs are probably karma magnets (and therefore implicit karma requests) - hence my comment about kmarion being in a bad mood (plus he closed my (I thought rather funny) 'obsession' thread))
Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2007-07-07 18:43:36)
I just helped avoid the confusion. Surely you can see how "Give me Karma" in a title could be misinterpreted. All I did was adjust it.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
karma requesting...Hurricane wrote:
I don't see what was wrong with the title but ok...Scorpion0x17 wrote:
You in a bad mood today?
(and, no, I don't think deathunlimited was actually requesting karma either, if that's what you mean - I think he (deathunlimited) was pointing out that chicks in sigs are probably karma magnets (and therefore implicit karma requests) - hence my comment about kmarion being in a bad mood (plus he closed my (I thought rather funny) 'obsession' thread))
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Parentheses aren't very stylish these days.Kmarion wrote:
I just helped avoid the confusion. Surely you can see how "Give me Karma" in a title could be misinterpreted. All I did was adjust it.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
karma requesting...Hurricane wrote:
I don't see what was wrong with the title but ok...
(and, no, I don't think deathunlimited was actually requesting karma either, if that's what you mean - I think he (deathunlimited) was pointing out that chicks in sigs are probably karma magnets (and therefore implicit karma requests) - hence my comment about kmarion being in a bad mood (plus he closed my (I thought rather funny) 'obsession' thread))
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((what are you talking about???))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))Ryan wrote:
Parentheses aren't very stylish these days.Kmarion wrote:
I just helped avoid the confusion. Surely you can see how "Give me Karma" in a title could be misinterpreted. All I did was adjust it.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
karma requesting...
(and, no, I don't think deathunlimited was actually requesting karma either, if that's what you mean - I think he (deathunlimited) was pointing out that chicks in sigs are probably karma magnets (and therefore implicit karma requests) - hence my comment about kmarion being in a bad mood (plus he closed my (I thought rather funny) 'obsession' thread))
You know you guys can turn off sigs? That's what I do, nothing interesting in them, and they just slow down loading time.
Out of curiosity, Andoura, where did you get your sig? Is it someone you know personally? That pic certainly doesn't look like a professional model who knows she's being photographed, so it begs the question...
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh you will never knowkingofkolt wrote:
Out of curiosity, Andoura, where did you get your sig? Is it someone you know personally? That pic certainly doesn't look like a professional model who knows she's being photographed, so it begs the question...
i just have images in sigs turned off.
I know ...Andoura wrote:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh you will never knowkingofkolt wrote:
Out of curiosity, Andoura, where did you get your sig? Is it someone you know personally? That pic certainly doesn't look like a professional model who knows she's being photographed, so it begs the question...
edit: wait, crap ... you changed your sig (I just know where your last two came from).
Ah, I know what that means.Andoura wrote:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh you will never knowkingofkolt wrote:
Out of curiosity, Andoura, where did you get your sig? Is it someone you know personally? That pic certainly doesn't look like a professional model who knows she's being photographed, so it begs the question...
(It's his drunk passed-out sister.)
If that's true...Andoura....please adopt me.kingofkolt wrote:
Ah, I know what that means.Andoura wrote:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh you will never knowkingofkolt wrote:
Out of curiosity, Andoura, where did you get your sig? Is it someone you know personally? That pic certainly doesn't look like a professional model who knows she's being photographed, so it begs the question...
(It's his drunk passed-out sister.)
Honestly, I agree. Do I mind seeing an attractive girl wearing next to nothing? No, of course not.
However...we do get a lot of kids surfing these forums...and a lot of users check this website from work/school. I do think we need to be a bit less lenient when it comes to naked girls in signatures, but it's near impossible to draw the line...what do you say? No nudity is the rule now...but just because a girl has her nipples pshopped out doesn't make it ok...at least not in my opinion.
However...we do get a lot of kids surfing these forums...and a lot of users check this website from work/school. I do think we need to be a bit less lenient when it comes to naked girls in signatures, but it's near impossible to draw the line...what do you say? No nudity is the rule now...but just because a girl has her nipples pshopped out doesn't make it ok...at least not in my opinion.
Noop its not my sister loooolxBlackPantherx wrote:
If that's true...Andoura....please adopt me.kingofkolt wrote:
Ah, I know what that means.Andoura wrote:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh you will never know
(It's his drunk passed-out sister.)
Best friend's sister?Andoura wrote:
Noop its not my sister loooolxBlackPantherx wrote:
If that's true...Andoura....please adopt me.kingofkolt wrote:
Ah, I know what that means.
(It's his drunk passed-out sister.)
But then how will I recognize who has something worth reading? Seriously, I identify folks by their sigs nowadays. Looking to the left side of my screen takes so much work (since my screen is six miles by five miles (width x height)maestrium wrote:
You know you guys can turn off sigs? That's what I do, nothing interesting in them, and they just slow down loading time.
A bunch of GUYS on a game forum should NOT have hot CHICKS in their signatures because that would be totally GAY.
nooopppppUndetected_Killer wrote:
Best friend's sister?Andoura wrote:
Noop its not my sister loooolxBlackPantherx wrote:
If that's true...Andoura....please adopt me.
mkay, I was being sarcastic anyways. You can see this hasn't been padding to meKmarion wrote:
I fixed your thread title. Click here to find out why.
Anyways. I agree with the guy who said earlier (not word to word): "I don't mind the chicks like the one in Andoura's sig, but the oiled chicks in tight bikinis are too much here"
And I won't turn the sig images off because I want to see other sig images duh.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
:-p
Last edited by [LCI]squeakyfleece (2007-07-07 23:08:05)
^^^ That is hawt, i think i wet me self
Its a stupid way of acting like your a "man's man." If you put a half-naked girl in your sig you MUST be cool. Not to mention you'll be almost guaranteed to get karma from every 11 year old boy who sees it.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Why put a half naked chick in sig. To beg for karma, or for a more specific reason? If there is a reason, please tell me.
Am I the only one who thinks those sigs don't belong here.
My gf doesn't even believe this is a gaming community.
Last edited by Velker (2007-07-07 23:38:26)
it really does not make it look like a better place. most of the women (i can't even call them that because most of them are made of plastic now) are completely ugly, have been plasticized at every part of their body. GET REAL when you go out, i bet you rarely see that (unless there is some 'celebrity') and there is no point in even seeing that. you go out with a girl because she looks nice and you think it might cool to go out, not because she is a celebrity or got a $100000 boob job.xBlackPantherx wrote:
Too much oil and they just slip right off....LT.Victim wrote:
QFTLtMarcus wrote:
no, it doesn't...
but it DOES make bf2s a more interesting place, it cheers the forums up imo.
for example, andourra's sig is fine by me but i don't like oiled up babes with tiny bikini's (on bf2s that is ^^)
i would love to see these signatures removed. it's embarrassing, it really is.
I heard from Ty during an old discussion about this, my old sig was the BORDERLINE. No one can make it a little more nudity than that.ThomasMorgan wrote:
Honestly, I agree. Do I mind seeing an attractive girl wearing next to nothing? No, of course not.
However...we do get a lot of kids surfing these forums...and a lot of users check this website from work/school. I do think we need to be a bit less lenient when it comes to naked girls in signatures, but it's near impossible to draw the line...what do you say? No nudity is the rule now...but just because a girl has her nipples pshopped out doesn't make it ok...at least not in my opinion.
I dont see the problem, if you're veiwing from work/school then there's an option that lets you turn sigs on/off, and i reckon some of the sigs with chicks in them are awesome