henno13
A generally unremarkable member
+230|6612|Belfast
last time i checked,
the Source engine is far more advanced that the peice of terd which is known as the bf2 engine
how come i can put all settings* to high# and it can cause NO problems, restrictions etc. on the Source

but on bf2 all i can edit is Geometry,textures,texture filtiring and effects
and i have them all on high and i have no lag whatsoever

all this with a crappy ATI Radeon 9200 series and 1.5GB RAM

whats wrong?

*: AAS excluded
#: its the recomended setting

Last edited by henno13 (2007-07-21 00:56:31)

RDMC
Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!
+736|6828|Area 51
High settings with a 9200? O.o
Fenix14
scout rush kekeke ^___^
+116|6820|Brisbane, Aus

still don't get it....  what the heck are you on about?
some_random_panda
Flamesuit essential
+454|6654

He means why can we run Source games on all high settings but not BF2.
psH
Banned
+217|6647|Sydney
Maybe your meant to play Source? Like god is interfering?
Fenix14
scout rush kekeke ^___^
+116|6820|Brisbane, Aus

In that case...

BF2 and Source are 2 completely different games.

Source: Small maps that have high quality, the default settings when you install any source game are usually on High, any more than 12 players a side and you 'could' start getting lag. Plus it was out a few years before BF2 so you don't need much to run it well.

BF2: made for totally different gameplay, has 64 players, loads of vehicles, Huge maps, and can get quite detailed. You need 2 gig ram for starters if you even Hope to run BF2 on high quality.
TimmmmaaaaH
Damn, I... had something for this
+725|6703|Brisbane, Australia

some_random_panda wrote:

He means why can we run Source games on all high settings but not BF2.
I have always thought the source engine was pretty amazing (then again i have only played hl2).

To me it looks better than bf2, and performs a trillion times better.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/5e6a35c97adb20771c7b713312c0307c23a7a36a.png
Nappy
Apprentice
+151|6492|NSW, Australia

TimmmmaaaaH wrote:

some_random_panda wrote:

He means why can we run Source games on all high settings but not BF2.
I have always thought the source engine was pretty amazing (then again i have only played hl2).

To me it looks better than bf2, and performs a trillion times better.
thats why you get a decent computer...
i could run source on my pentium 2
Sgt.Gene
...
+215|7027

Fenix14 wrote:

In that case...

BF2 and Source are 2 completely different games.

Source: Small maps that have high quality, the default settings when you install any source game are usually on High, any more than 12 players a side and you 'could' start getting lag. Plus it was out a few years before BF2 so you don't need much to run it well.

BF2: made for totally different gameplay, has 64 players, loads of vehicles, Huge maps, and can get quite detailed. You need 2 gig ram for starters if you even Hope to run BF2 on high quality.
I run BF2 on all high with 1gb of RAM.

Am I special?
Surgeons
U shud proabbly f off u fat prik
+3,097|6753|Gogledd Cymru

Sgt.Gene wrote:

Fenix14 wrote:

In that case...

BF2 and Source are 2 completely different games.

Source: Small maps that have high quality, the default settings when you install any source game are usually on High, any more than 12 players a side and you 'could' start getting lag. Plus it was out a few years before BF2 so you don't need much to run it well.

BF2: made for totally different gameplay, has 64 players, loads of vehicles, Huge maps, and can get quite detailed. You need 2 gig ram for starters if you even Hope to run BF2 on high quality.
I run BF2 on all high with 1gb of RAM.

Am I special?
You know kmal, as do i we can bes speshuls together
elite.mafia
Banned
+122|6717|USA
I play source on all high and bf2 on all low... point being???
XRogerMellieX
Member
+8|6592

TimmmmaaaaH wrote:

some_random_panda wrote:

He means why can we run Source games on all high settings but not BF2.
I have always thought the source engine was pretty amazing (then again i have only played hl2).

To me it looks better than bf2, and performs a trillion times better.
play Insurgency (hl2 mod), it's possibly the hottest looking game on the market at the moment, and it's free!
ShadowFoX
I Hate Claymores
+109|6794
Because the BF2 engine was made by a bunch of tards and the Source engine was not made by a bunch of tards. And source is rather optimized while BF2 is not.
gene_pool
Banned
+519|6885|Gold coast, Aus.
Because source is better than this shit game?
elite.mafia
Banned
+122|6717|USA

gene_pool wrote:

Because source is better than this shit game?
QFT


s
Reiskis
Member
+6|6413|Bartlett Illinois
i play both games on all high whats your point?
Blehm98
conservative hatemonger
+150|6726|meh-land

gene_pool wrote:

Because source is better than this shit game?
1. I hate bf2
2. BF2 - Low settings FTW!!!  they look 100x better than the high graphics settings
DUnlimited
got any popo lolo intersting?
+1,160|6726|cuntshitlake

Blehm98 wrote:

gene_pool wrote:

Because source is better than this shit game?
1. I hate bf2
2. BF2 - Low settings FTW!!!  they look 100x better than the high graphics settings
no they don't look better, but they PLAY better. You see enemies much better on low settings. (all low, high resolution)

Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2007-07-21 10:25:17)

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard