BF2S Forums Why? (Arab nations angry at the creation of Israeli state after WW2)

Cerpin_Taxt wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

I feel this topic could get closed, coz some mods don't like Israel threads, even when the topic isn't about Israel.

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=81004

Courtesy of badhq.

I am also a forum search ho'[/url]

topal63 commanded the Amazonian Chicks with the big jubblies to masterfully punish their keyboard and thus resulted:

Fancy would troll through peoples past posts in an attempt to find either inconsistencies or things he considered retarded. And, then he would quote-post those in an attempt to childishly discredit someone (in every other thread they participated in). He did this a lot to IRONCHEF & Serge (ed) as I recall.

P.S. I doubt the search feature exists for the express purpose of past post trolling. It exists (IMO) so that duplicate threads are not created.

Last edited by m3thod (2007-07-20 12:25:15)

m3thod wrote:

Cerpin_Taxt wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

I feel this topic could get closed, coz some mods don't like Israel threads, even when the topic isn't about Israel.

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=81004

Courtesy of badhq.

I am also a forum search ho'[/url]

topal63 commanded the Amazonian Chicks with the big jubblies to masterfully punish their keyboard and thus resulted:

Fancy would troll through peoples past posts in an attempt to find either inconsistencies or things he considered retarded. And, then he would quote-post those in an attempt to childishly discredit someone (in every other thread they participated in). He did this a lot to IRONCHEF & Serge (ed) as I recall.

P.S. I doubt the search feature exists for the express purpose of past post trolling. It exists (IMO) so that duplicate threads are not created.

Off-topic. What an immature moron Fancy was.

nukchebi0 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

I see why. They definitely should have ensured a smoother, less disruptive relocation of Palestinian people.

Why on earth should the Palestinians have been relocated? If someone told you tomorrow that the UN decided your house and business was being given to a Mexican immigrant would you not regard yourself as having been done an injustice?

Yes. So are you saying that the Jews and Arabs should have coexisted peacefully within what is now Israel.

They had done for centuries. The Jewish immigration that was permitted under British administration following WWI fucked things up a bit. Prior to that it was part of the Ottoman empire.

CameronPoe wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Perhaps if the jews had stayed and not pussied out when the Romans started oppressing them this problem would not exist today. The Irish didn't just wholesale ditch Ireland when the Brits invaded.

The Jews didn't pussy out.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_rebellion

Ever heard of Masada? Ever heard of the jewish diaspora? Any idea why Europe had more than 6 million jews in it in the 1930s?

Ah but you see its not much different from how all the Irish ended up in America, they left because they had no food when the British cut off all other supplies of food after the potatoes went kaput. In a sense they could have stayed and fought to get at the wheat or something, so I'm not saying they are but does that make them pussies as well because they left?

Because instead of giving parts of Germany to the Jews they took parts from a country which had nothing to do with the extermination of the Jews and gave it to them, without even talking to the people who lived in that country.

You cant just take someones home and say its not urs anymore. it doesnt work like that. If they wanted to do something for the Jews cos of the holocaust, they shuda given them germany. Not give them control of land which wasnt theirs and without consent from the people living there.

ATG wrote:

except there were always Jews in Israel.

There were also always semites that did not follow Judaism (i.e., arabs).

Thats not compromise, thats a massacare. Are you american? Ah, i see you are. That explains it.

nukchebi0 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

nukchebi0 wrote:

I see why. They definitely should have ensured a smoother, less disruptive relocation of Palestinian people.

Why on earth should the Palestinians have been relocated? If someone told you tomorrow that the UN decided your house and business was being given to a Mexican immigrant would you not regard yourself as having been done an injustice?

Yes. So are you saying that the Jews and Arabs should have coexisted peacefully within what is now Israel.

That was the plan. The Jewish immigrants just didn't play fair.

There was a massive policy of deliberate economic deprivement (well documented), which alongside the lack of integration by the Jewish immigrants (things like Jews refusing to use Arab shops, Jewish doctors refusing to treat Arab patients, refusal to employ Arabs by the Jews except the most menial of tasks) which led to widespread resentment towards the Jewish immigrants.

Fearing this resentment the Jewish immigrants began conducting terror attacks against the Palestinian civilians (bombs in marketplaces were quite popular) and against the British administration, which took the side of the Palestinian people because the Jewish immigrants were not meeting their responsibilities to co-exist peacefully with the Palestinians - which was always a condition of the Balfour declaration. After the British issued the White Paper of 1939 imposing greater restrictions on Jewish immigration and attempting to calm the situation down, the Jewish immigrants became even more violent and the laws governing immigration were completely ignored, the British took measures to enforce the restrictions on immigration and the Jewish attempts to circumvent the British border control and naval blockades became known as Aliyah Bet.

Illegal immigrants came into the country with loads of money, bought all the good stuff (with loans from the centralised Jewish Agency), wouldn't integrate with the existing communities and treated them as inferior, bombed civilians, bombed the military, then declared themselves a nation and expelled loads of the people living there from their homes and killed many who refused to leave (ethnic cleansing). That's why a few people got quite pissed off at them.

Cerpin_Taxt wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

I feel this topic could get closed, coz some mods don't like Israel threads, even when the topic isn't about Israel.

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=81004

Courtesy of badhq.

Oh please...

Could it have been closed because you have made like 40 Israel threads!? (this list doesn't include any of your Israel threads from the past month...God only knows how long it would be if it did)

How to Achieve Peace for Dummies

47% of Americans Think Israel is Justified in Killing Civilians

The Real Job of the IDF

Does Israel want the rockets to stop?

Wouldn't You Hate Them Too if You Were Living There?

The Israeli SOLUTION to the Palestinian Problem

Jews Want Israel to Raise its Moral Standard

Should Olmert Resign?

Is this Fighting Terrorism or Supporting it?

Jerusalem Should Be Declared Capital of the World

It's All About Education

Is Retaliation the Solution?

A Nuke Would Be Nicer

Israel Used Palestinian Kids as Human Shields

Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Peace Settlement

Israel Nukes and the Refusal to Sign the NPT Go Unpunished

Palestinians: scapegoats for Hitler's Failures?

They steal your home: what would you do?

Israel Won't Deal with the New Palestinian Government

Winds of Change?

Israel leaving the Occupied Territories

I am Israel

Interesting Video About .s.a.l

Palestine & Israel Discussion Thread

247 People Gazassinated Since June

First Step to Achieve Peace: US Incredible Opportunity

Global Leaders Call for Action on Arab-Israeli Settlement

How Many More People Should Israel kill?

Isn't it outrageous?

Could Israel be anti-semite?

Is Israel fucking with the world?

Should Israel negotiate with Hezbollah?

How 'd you solve the conflict between Israel and muslin countries?

I think I'm gonna have to make a sticky where all the Israel threads get put in and it keeps grawnig by the day......

I'm not closing this thread because I don't agree with you.... I'm closing it because there are tons of same sort of subject on here... ( if it's not exactly the same, then it's very similar)


Thread Closed

As you can see Cerpin_Taxt has found you some threads that should keep you entertained for few weeks if not you can find more here

http://forums.bf2s.com/search.php?search_id=1948855844

Peace Boris

Wolphoenix wrote:

Thats not compromise, thats a massacare. Are you american? Ah, i see you are. That explains it.

How come?

Bertster7 wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

Wolphoenix wrote:

Thats not compromise, thats a massacare. Are you american? Ah, i see you are. That explains it.

How come?

I'd assume he means because of consistent US support for Israel despite any acts they may have committed that have been condemned by the rest of the world.

Either that or Americans perceived desire to bomb every Arab state into the stone age (which considering the post he was addressing seems more likely).

Ah I see, that's the way I feel sometimes though I'll admit, I'm not saying I really want that to happen or such, but y'know .

"Used to be" doesn't matter. America "used to be" the native american's. Britain "used to be" the celt's and the pict's. Israel "used to be" the jews, but it also "used to be" the caananites. A lot of places "used to" belong to someone else, but that holds no legal or political significance in the PRESENT. The argument that Israel "used to be" the jew's is mere propoganda created by the zionist jews as early as WWI.