Poll

What Does This Mean to You?

A step in the good direction40%40% - 21
A confession that deserves impeachment30%30% - 16
Other28%28% - 15
Total: 52
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7094|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

You mean I can not go through these posts and dig up where you said the London bombing was comitted because England was in IRAQ??!! Betcha I can.

Also can we add these countries backto the list of no terrorist activity now since you just said "ANY non-muslim nation might be threatened by Islamic terrorism?"

In another thread you ask:

"Answer me this: why don't Islamic extremists attack any of the following countries?"

- Japan
- South Korea
- South Africa
- Brazil
- Chile
- Argentina
- Panama
- Ireland
- China
- Romania
- Bulgaria
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Sweden
- Norway
- Finland
- Iceland
- Portugal
- Costa Rica
- Mexico
- Belize
- Cuba
- Venezuela
- Nicaragua
- Paraguay
- Uruguay
- Ecuador
- Bolivia
- El Salvador
- Jamaica

So which is it Cam? Is the world at war against Islamic extremism, or isn't it?
Certain western countries are bearing the brunt of islamic extremist terrorism, mainly those supporting Israel or oppressive regimes in the middle east. Can you answer me why none of those countries listed have been affected?

PS The 7/7 bombing, one particular act of terrorism, was in retaliation for the Iraq war - as stated in their suicide videos.
Sooooooooooooooo where does Italy fit in all of a sudden??

As for the countries listed, as I stated before, they simply have not gotten in the way of the terrorists yet. Or are you going to imply that as soon as the terrorists find a reason to attack one of these countries they will not because of their rational nature and willingness to talk?

Last edited by lowing (2007-07-21 18:02:13)

CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6998

lowing wrote:

Sooooooooooooooo where does Italy fit in all of a sudden??

As for the countries listed, as I stated before, they simply have not gotten in the way of the terrorists yet. Or are you going to imply that as soon as the terrorists find a reason to attack one of these countries they will not because of their rational nature and willingness to talk?
Italy had troops in Iraq. That's probably the main reason they were singled out.

I can't possibly envisage an Islamic-extremist terror attack on a Latin American country. Why do they seem to be targeting mainly the US, UK, Spain, Italy and Australia? There must be a common link there somewhere....
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7094|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Sooooooooooooooo where does Italy fit in all of a sudden??

As for the countries listed, as I stated before, they simply have not gotten in the way of the terrorists yet. Or are you going to imply that as soon as the terrorists find a reason to attack one of these countries they will not because of their rational nature and willingness to talk?
Italy had troops in Iraq. That's probably the main reason they were singled out.

I can't possibly envisage an Islamic-extremist terror attack on a Latin American country. Why do they seem to be targeting mainly the US, UK, Spain, Italy and Australia? There must be a common link there somewhere....
Oh so Islamic extremists are using GOOD reasons to blow up civilians now? I kinda am leaning toward the flavor of the week scenario. The second ANY country regardless of global significance does something that the terrorists do not agree with, they will be attacked. Or do you think not?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6998

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Sooooooooooooooo where does Italy fit in all of a sudden??

As for the countries listed, as I stated before, they simply have not gotten in the way of the terrorists yet. Or are you going to imply that as soon as the terrorists find a reason to attack one of these countries they will not because of their rational nature and willingness to talk?
Italy had troops in Iraq. That's probably the main reason they were singled out.

I can't possibly envisage an Islamic-extremist terror attack on a Latin American country. Why do they seem to be targeting mainly the US, UK, Spain, Italy and Australia? There must be a common link there somewhere....
Oh so Islamic extremists are using GOOD reasons to blow up civilians now? I kinda am leaning toward the flavor of the week scenario. The second ANY country regardless of global significance does something that the terrorists do not agree with, they will be attacked. Or do you think not?
It certainly seems that way. But why should any of those nations want to pry or interfere with the internal politics of far flung foreign nations? The only foreign nations anyone should concern themselves with are those openly threatening you. If you haven't been threatened then why on earth would you go out of your way to make sure that you do get threatened?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7094|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


Italy had troops in Iraq. That's probably the main reason they were singled out.

I can't possibly envisage an Islamic-extremist terror attack on a Latin American country. Why do they seem to be targeting mainly the US, UK, Spain, Italy and Australia? There must be a common link there somewhere....
Oh so Islamic extremists are using GOOD reasons to blow up civilians now? I kinda am leaning toward the flavor of the week scenario. The second ANY country regardless of global significance does something that the terrorists do not agree with, they will be attacked. Or do you think not?
It certainly seems that way. But why should any of those nations want to pry or interfere with the internal politics of far flung foreign nations? The only foreign nations anyone should concern themselves with are those openly threatening you. If you haven't been threatened then why on earth would you go out of your way to make sure that you do get threatened?
You wouldn't but what I am suggesting is, the terrorists decide, NOT the countries, what a threat is. So unless you hurry up and appease the terrorists and what THEY consider a threat, you are destined for attacks. yes or no?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6998

lowing wrote:

You wouldn't but what I am suggesting is, the terrorists decide, NOT the countries, what a threat is. So unless you hurry up and appease the terrorists and what THEY consider a threat, you are destined for attacks. yes or no?
If that is the case then why have little or no western nations, those that never indulged in economic imperialism in the middle east, been the target of attacks? Why is that?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7094|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

You wouldn't but what I am suggesting is, the terrorists decide, NOT the countries, what a threat is. So unless you hurry up and appease the terrorists and what THEY consider a threat, you are destined for attacks. yes or no?
If that is the case then why have little or no western nations, those that never indulged in economic imperialism in the middle east, been the target of attacks? Why is that?
little or no indulgence in the ME? Well, I sure hope none of the countries you are speaking of drive cars or fly airplanes that use ME oil. If so, I think that makes them accomplices to anything that happens there.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6998

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

You wouldn't but what I am suggesting is, the terrorists decide, NOT the countries, what a threat is. So unless you hurry up and appease the terrorists and what THEY consider a threat, you are destined for attacks. yes or no?
If that is the case then why have little or no western nations, those that never indulged in economic imperialism in the middle east, been the target of attacks? Why is that?
little or no indulgence in the ME? Well, I sure hope none of the countries you are speaking of drive cars or fly airplanes that use ME oil. If so, I think that makes them accomplices to anything that happens there.
We buy the oil lowing, we don't have the governments who prop up the corrupt and abhorrent regimes in the region so that our corporations can drill for, pump and distribute their oil, charging massive royalties making sure the people on the ground don't see a red cent.
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|7107|NT, like Mick Dundee

*grabs popcorn*
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
UGADawgs
Member
+13|6764|South Carolina, US

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


If that is the case then why have little or no western nations, those that never indulged in economic imperialism in the middle east, been the target of attacks? Why is that?
little or no indulgence in the ME? Well, I sure hope none of the countries you are speaking of drive cars or fly airplanes that use ME oil. If so, I think that makes them accomplices to anything that happens there.
We buy the oil lowing, we don't have the governments who prop up the corrupt and abhorrent regimes in the region so that our corporations can drill for, pump and distribute their oil, charging massive royalties making sure the people on the ground don't see a red cent.
Last time I checked the cash situation was pretty good for citizens in Dubai, Oman, Bahrain, etc....
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6998

UGADawgs wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

little or no indulgence in the ME? Well, I sure hope none of the countries you are speaking of drive cars or fly airplanes that use ME oil. If so, I think that makes them accomplices to anything that happens there.
We buy the oil lowing, we don't have the governments who prop up the corrupt and abhorrent regimes in the region so that our corporations can drill for, pump and distribute their oil, charging massive royalties making sure the people on the ground don't see a red cent.
Last time I checked the cash situation was pretty good for citizens in Dubai, Oman, Bahrain, etc....
And what about in Iraq and Saudi Arabia - the major producers? Not so sure about Oman either...

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-07-21 19:36:27)

The_Mac
Member
+96|6668
Yay! What next? Legalizing giving terrorists breakfast in bed!

Maybe Bushy boo should do that too. Cater to liberal and terrorist scum alike! hip hooray?
l41e
Member
+677|7091

SealXo wrote:

The United States is pussing out, we need torturing, we need the flame thrower, and we need mustard gas. isnt it funny, since the flame throw was disbanned and we stopped torturing we havnt won a war?

If i was caught by the opposition, i would expect to be tortured.

EDIT:If the enemy is torturing your men, torture theres.
I don't recall us winning Vietnam.

https://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/6/6e/250px-Marineflametank1968.jpg
Havok
Nymphomaniac Treatment Specialist
+302|7117|Florida, United States

Now correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't torture already banned in the USA?  What makes you think they won't lie again?
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6991|San Diego, CA, USA
Way too late for PR.  Forceful interrogation techniques that do no cause permanent harm/scarring should be a tool that we should be able to use if and when our President finds it necessary (i.e. information that could save lives).
DeathBecomesYu
Member
+171|6622

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

You mean I can not go through these posts and dig up where you said the London bombing was comitted because England was in IRAQ??!! Betcha I can.

Also can we add these countries backto the list of no terrorist activity now since you just said "ANY non-muslim nation might be threatened by Islamic terrorism?"

In another thread you ask:

"Answer me this: why don't Islamic extremists attack any of the following countries?"

- Japan
- South Korea
- South Africa
- Brazil
- Chile
- Argentina
- Panama
- Ireland
- China
- Romania
- Bulgaria
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Sweden
- Norway
- Finland
- Iceland
- Portugal
- Costa Rica
- Mexico
- Belize
- Cuba
- Venezuela
- Nicaragua
- Paraguay
- Uruguay
- Ecuador
- Bolivia
- El Salvador
- Jamaica

So which is it Cam? Is the world at war against Islamic extremism, or isn't it?
Certain western countries are bearing the brunt of islamic extremist terrorism, mainly those supporting Israel or oppressive regimes in the middle east. Can you answer me why none of those countries listed have been affected?

PS The 7/7 bombing, one particular act of terrorism, was in retaliation for the Iraq war - as stated in their suicide videos.
That is easy Cam.....look at the history of the world. Hitler spread Germany and its Nazi ideology throughout Europe and almost defeated Russis. But of course it didn't reach the west (America, South America). Think about it for a moment. Even though the Nazi ideology didn't reach all over the globe....it was STILL a threat to us ALL.

During the Cold war. Communism spread throughout Eastern Europe and to many countries around southern Asia. Even though it didn't reach our shores...it STILL was a threat to the world. All you have to understand is that just because Radical Islam hasn't knocked on our door step YET...it is STILL a threat to us all. Do not forget a lot of countries outside the ME and Europe are facing Islamic movements and terror attacks. Many of those countries have nothing to do with Iraq. NOTHING!!!!! For example Indonesia, Phillipines, areas in Southern China and countries in Africa.

People need to stop blaming the war on Iraq for an Ideology that already existed and will exist long after we leave. The radical Islamic Ideology is a global movement. It hasn't reached too much outside of Europe and the ME but if you really look closely...it is starting to go beyond those areas into countries in Africa, Asia, Europe..etc..  It is just like any other sweeping Ideology that was a threat in the past.

How is this ideology movement any different. Yes, they are more difficult to target and fight because they don't have a border or uniforms. But they do have support and backing from countries who want to spread Radical Islam. Communism was similar in ways because countries like Russia and China armed and supported communist movements into South Korea, Vietnam and the west fought back. If we hadn't, communism would have been much more expansive, but at least we took it as a threat to freedom and helped fight it back and eventually won. It was won by a variety of actions. War, secret and blatant, and of course political and covert. They all played a part.

Radical Islam is no different. It wants to spread itself to all parts of the world. If you don't believe that then don't come crying to me when your grand kids are forced to rock back and forth while reciting the Koran. It IS a movement that is spreading like many ideologies of the past and sooner or later countries and armies will have to unite or fall one by one as many countries did during WW2 and the communists expansion into Eastern Europe and southern Asia. The Radical Islamic movement is a threat to us ALL....doesn't matter if it is here nor in South America...it is a threat regardless...just like the past.

Just because we don't have a problem here YET....does not mean that we are not facing a threat to the world....WE ARE!! To ignore that would be extremely ignorant. At least America will be ready.

Last edited by DeathBecomesYu (2007-07-21 22:41:30)

CC-Marley
Member
+407|7271

lowing wrote:

Leave it to liberal apologists and appeasers to determine that torture of terrorists to extract info that could save tens of thousands of innocent civilians in a terrorist attack, is a bad thing.

These same liberals will also be the first in line to first celebrate a perceived Bush failure, then bitch, piss and moan at the failure of the US govt. for letting the attack happen without doing something about it.


God, I hate liberals
Didn't they also criticize Bush 41 for not going into Baghdad?
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|7107|NT, like Mick Dundee

@DeathBecomesYu...


If radical Islam is such a threat.....

WHY THE FUCK DOES THE USA STILL CONSIDER SAUDI ARABIA ONE OF ITS BIGGEST ALLIES?



The source of Islamic extremism as we know it...
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
DeathBecomesYu
Member
+171|6622

Flecco wrote:

@DeathBecomesYu...


If radical Islam is such a threat.....

WHY THE FUCK DOES THE USA STILL CONSIDER SAUDI ARABIA ONE OF ITS BIGGEST ALLIES?



The source of Islamic extremism as we know it...
ummmm....first, take a deep breathe...You will be okay, relax.....breathe in, breath out.

First, let's get one thing straight. One government is not the source of terrorism, that's just ignorant. The ideology is!! I am talking about the Radical Islamic Movement. If you don't know. The radical Islamic movement wants to take down the Saudi leadership. Especially Bin Laden. So don't get those confused. The Saudi government is not supporting or providing weapons to terrorists. They aren't training them either. The Saudi government is a target like many other governments. Do you not listen to the videos that Bin Laden and his crew put out? They don't like the Saudi government and they are on a mission to take it down. So what is your point?

Oh, you probably wonder how we didn't go into Saudi Arabia because most of the 9/11 high jackers were Saudi. If you don't know, Bin Laden purposely chose mostly Saudis in the hope that it would drive a wedge between the American government and the Saudi government. But it didn't work. Now, of course many terrorists are Saudis and in Iraq, there has been reports that most of the FOREIGN insurgent force is Saudi. The difference is that these guys are coming in on there own. They are NOT being supported, trained, armed by the Saudi government unlike Iran which IS supporting, arming and training its Kuuds forces to meddle in Iraq. There is a difference.

Now, does the Saudi leadership have corrupt elements....probably...but what government in the world DOESN'T. There is no reason not to have Saudi Arabia as an ally. It is another partner like Jordan, Israel..etc. in the Middle East. If there was evidence that the Saudi government was being 2 faced to us and supplying, training terrorists....I am sure the liberal media would be all over it. So your BOLD point doesn't hold any water because even though many Saudis are caught up in terrorism on their own...it doesn't mean that the Saudi government is the reason. Again, don't forget that the government of Saudi is on the list of targets for Al-qaida......so you tell me this.

WHY WOULD TERRORISTS GROUPS WANT TO TAKE DOWN THE SAUDI GOVERNMENT IF THE SAUDI GOVERNMENT IS INVOLVED WITH TERRORISM???

Wouldn't that defeat the purpose? Doesn't make sense does it.
PureFodder
Member
+225|6728

DeathBecomesYu wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

You mean I can not go through these posts and dig up where you said the London bombing was comitted because England was in IRAQ??!! Betcha I can.

Also can we add these countries backto the list of no terrorist activity now since you just said "ANY non-muslim nation might be threatened by Islamic terrorism?"

In another thread you ask:

"Answer me this: why don't Islamic extremists attack any of the following countries?"

- Japan
- South Korea
- South Africa
- Brazil
- Chile
- Argentina
- Panama
- Ireland
- China
- Romania
- Bulgaria
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Sweden
- Norway
- Finland
- Iceland
- Portugal
- Costa Rica
- Mexico
- Belize
- Cuba
- Venezuela
- Nicaragua
- Paraguay
- Uruguay
- Ecuador
- Bolivia
- El Salvador
- Jamaica

So which is it Cam? Is the world at war against Islamic extremism, or isn't it?
Certain western countries are bearing the brunt of islamic extremist terrorism, mainly those supporting Israel or oppressive regimes in the middle east. Can you answer me why none of those countries listed have been affected?

PS The 7/7 bombing, one particular act of terrorism, was in retaliation for the Iraq war - as stated in their suicide videos.
That is easy Cam.....look at the history of the world. Hitler spread Germany and its Nazi ideology throughout Europe and almost defeated Russis. But of course it didn't reach the west (America, South America). Think about it for a moment. Even though the Nazi ideology didn't reach all over the globe....it was STILL a threat to us ALL.

During the Cold war. Communism spread throughout Eastern Europe and to many countries around southern Asia. Even though it didn't reach our shores...it STILL was a threat to the world. All you have to understand is that just because Radical Islam hasn't knocked on our door step YET...it is STILL a threat to us all. Do not forget a lot of countries outside the ME and Europe are facing Islamic movements and terror attacks. Many of those countries have nothing to do with Iraq. NOTHING!!!!! For example Indonesia, Phillipines, areas in Southern China and countries in Africa.

People need to stop blaming the war on Iraq for an Ideology that already existed and will exist long after we leave. The radical Islamic Ideology is a global movement. It hasn't reached too much outside of Europe and the ME but if you really look closely...it is starting to go beyond those areas into countries in Africa, Asia, Europe..etc..  It is just like any other sweeping Ideology that was a threat in the past.

How is this ideology movement any different. Yes, they are more difficult to target and fight because they don't have a border or uniforms. But they do have support and backing from countries who want to spread Radical Islam. Communism was similar in ways because countries like Russia and China armed and supported communist movements into South Korea, Vietnam and the west fought back. If we hadn't, communism would have been much more expansive, but at least we took it as a threat to freedom and helped fight it back and eventually won. It was won by a variety of actions. War, secret and blatant, and of course political and covert. They all played a part.

Radical Islam is no different. It wants to spread itself to all parts of the world. If you don't believe that then don't come crying to me when your grand kids are forced to rock back and forth while reciting the Koran. It IS a movement that is spreading like many ideologies of the past and sooner or later countries and armies will have to unite or fall one by one as many countries did during WW2 and the communists expansion into Eastern Europe and southern Asia. The Radical Islamic movement is a threat to us ALL....doesn't matter if it is here nor in South America...it is a threat regardless...just like the past.

Just because we don't have a problem here YET....does not mean that we are not facing a threat to the world....WE ARE!! To ignore that would be extremely ignorant. At least America will be ready.
One of the ways that is typically used to get radical agendas pushed onto the masses is to give them a common enemy. The Nazis used the Jews, the Islamic extremists are using the USA, the 'great satan'. By invading Islamic countries, killing civillians and torturing people the US is doing a great job of actively fitting and confirming its own demonised image. If you don't want these people to hate you, don't keep on giving them reasons to hate you.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6998

DeathBecomesYu wrote:

That is easy Cam.....look at the history of the world. Hitler spread Germany and its Nazi ideology throughout Europe and almost defeated Russis. But of course it didn't reach the west (America, South America). Think about it for a moment. Even though the Nazi ideology didn't reach all over the globe....it was STILL a threat to us ALL.

During the Cold war. Communism spread throughout Eastern Europe and to many countries around southern Asia. Even though it didn't reach our shores...it STILL was a threat to the world. All you have to understand is that just because Radical Islam hasn't knocked on our door step YET...it is STILL a threat to us all. Do not forget a lot of countries outside the ME and Europe are facing Islamic movements and terror attacks. Many of those countries have nothing to do with Iraq. NOTHING!!!!! For example Indonesia, Phillipines, areas in Southern China and countries in Africa.

People need to stop blaming the war on Iraq for an Ideology that already existed and will exist long after we leave. The radical Islamic Ideology is a global movement. It hasn't reached too much outside of Europe and the ME but if you really look closely...it is starting to go beyond those areas into countries in Africa, Asia, Europe..etc..  It is just like any other sweeping Ideology that was a threat in the past.

How is this ideology movement any different. Yes, they are more difficult to target and fight because they don't have a border or uniforms. But they do have support and backing from countries who want to spread Radical Islam. Communism was similar in ways because countries like Russia and China armed and supported communist movements into South Korea, Vietnam and the west fought back. If we hadn't, communism would have been much more expansive, but at least we took it as a threat to freedom and helped fight it back and eventually won. It was won by a variety of actions. War, secret and blatant, and of course political and covert. They all played a part.

Radical Islam is no different. It wants to spread itself to all parts of the world. If you don't believe that then don't come crying to me when your grand kids are forced to rock back and forth while reciting the Koran. It IS a movement that is spreading like many ideologies of the past and sooner or later countries and armies will have to unite or fall one by one as many countries did during WW2 and the communists expansion into Eastern Europe and southern Asia. The Radical Islamic movement is a threat to us ALL....doesn't matter if it is here nor in South America...it is a threat regardless...just like the past.

Just because we don't have a problem here YET....does not mean that we are not facing a threat to the world....WE ARE!! To ignore that would be extremely ignorant. At least America will be ready.
Are radical Islamists going to charge the beaches at Delaware in amphibious landing craft? Are 'Al Panzer' spearheads of Islamic tanks going to be trundling across the bosphorus towards Europe? No. All they'll be doing is attempting to bomb civilians with isolated attacks, which will probably continue as long as there is a muslim left standing on this earth and a Pakistani madrasa nearby. USA is safe by virtue of its geography, all it needs to do to preserve itself is to improve domestic security and perhaps get that missile shield up and running: it's that simple.

What stopped Hitler was a complete and utter annihilation of his country. Collective punishment was deemed acceptable because he posed an existential threat to us all, was popular amongst his people and was using the apparatus of the state and its military to achieve this. No nation today poses such a threat or is anywhere near the US or Europe in terms of military prowess. If a sovereign nation tries anything on us they'll be blasted into next week. You also seem to forget that when it was necessary we came together to DEFEAT Hitler.

I think you forget also that the popularity of Hitler was borne out of desperation and a massively politically fractured Germany, buckling under the strain of the Versailles treaty. He was strong and delivered on promises of jobs, food on their tables and a renewed sense of pride. What radical Islam offers is an opportunity to commit suicide as long as you don't want an open coffin funeral. It offers nothing of benefit whatsoever. It will always only be a fringe movement. It couldn't possibly gather enough popular support inside a western nation to do any real damage, certainly not on the scale of Adolf Hitler: that's for sure. You cannot defeat the radical islam ideology in the same manner the Nazi movement was destroyed, unless of course you're advocating the genocide of every last one of the 1 billion or so muslims there are in this world today...

PS Communism did not spread in Europe - it was a quiet 'communism or else' word in their ear from the Soviet Union 'liberators'.

PPS Indonesia, the Phillipines and the countries you mention in Africa have very sizeable long-standing muslim minorities - and in the case of Indonesia: the largest population of muslims on earth. The movements in Africa and the Phillipines are independence movements, unsurprising given that Islam is not really compatible with Christian or Western-style government/civilisation. The issue in Indonesia is more serious but Indonesia is thousands of miles from either the US or Europe. To be honest, we supported that cunt General Suharto for so long that we're probably due for some retaliation against our interests there, not that I condone the methods they will no doubt employ.

PPS Lol at the grandkids comment. That is hilariously delusional. Ireland has a practically non-existent muslim community.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-07-22 05:12:43)

psychotoxic187
Member
+11|7152

PureFodder wrote:

DeathBecomesYu wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


Certain western countries are bearing the brunt of islamic extremist terrorism, mainly those supporting Israel or oppressive regimes in the middle east. Can you answer me why none of those countries listed have been affected?

PS The 7/7 bombing, one particular act of terrorism, was in retaliation for the Iraq war - as stated in their suicide videos.
That is easy Cam.....look at the history of the world. Hitler spread Germany and its Nazi ideology throughout Europe and almost defeated Russis. But of course it didn't reach the west (America, South America). Think about it for a moment. Even though the Nazi ideology didn't reach all over the globe....it was STILL a threat to us ALL.

During the Cold war. Communism spread throughout Eastern Europe and to many countries around southern Asia. Even though it didn't reach our shores...it STILL was a threat to the world. All you have to understand is that just because Radical Islam hasn't knocked on our door step YET...it is STILL a threat to us all. Do not forget a lot of countries outside the ME and Europe are facing Islamic movements and terror attacks. Many of those countries have nothing to do with Iraq. NOTHING!!!!! For example Indonesia, Phillipines, areas in Southern China and countries in Africa.

People need to stop blaming the war on Iraq for an Ideology that already existed and will exist long after we leave. The radical Islamic Ideology is a global movement. It hasn't reached too much outside of Europe and the ME but if you really look closely...it is starting to go beyond those areas into countries in Africa, Asia, Europe..etc..  It is just like any other sweeping Ideology that was a threat in the past.

How is this ideology movement any different. Yes, they are more difficult to target and fight because they don't have a border or uniforms. But they do have support and backing from countries who want to spread Radical Islam. Communism was similar in ways because countries like Russia and China armed and supported communist movements into South Korea, Vietnam and the west fought back. If we hadn't, communism would have been much more expansive, but at least we took it as a threat to freedom and helped fight it back and eventually won. It was won by a variety of actions. War, secret and blatant, and of course political and covert. They all played a part.

Radical Islam is no different. It wants to spread itself to all parts of the world. If you don't believe that then don't come crying to me when your grand kids are forced to rock back and forth while reciting the Koran. It IS a movement that is spreading like many ideologies of the past and sooner or later countries and armies will have to unite or fall one by one as many countries did during WW2 and the communists expansion into Eastern Europe and southern Asia. The Radical Islamic movement is a threat to us ALL....doesn't matter if it is here nor in South America...it is a threat regardless...just like the past.

Just because we don't have a problem here YET....does not mean that we are not facing a threat to the world....WE ARE!! To ignore that would be extremely ignorant. At least America will be ready.
One of the ways that is typically used to get radical agendas pushed onto the masses is to give them a common enemy. The Nazis used the Jews, the Islamic extremists are using the USA, the 'great satan'. By invading Islamic countries, killing civillians and torturing people the US is doing a great job of actively fitting and confirming its own demonised image. If you don't want these people to hate you, don't keep on giving them reasons to hate you.
Doesn't matter what we do, they will hate us anyway. They hate anyone who does not follow their own beliefs.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard