buLLet_t00th
Mr. Boombastic
+178|6915|Stealth City, UK

ReDevilJR wrote:

Even if you get a P35 Board http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6813128048 that supports DDR2/3 and 45nm processors. It does NOT support SLI if you have future plans in that. And they do not appear to be as good as the 680i's for OC'ing (From what I've heard)
True, but he didn't say anything about SLi.

In general, without OC'n coming into the picture just yet, the P35 beats the 680i. With OC'n the P35 is a lot more stable, they both support 1333 FSB so thats a good thing, but 680i isn't amazingly better at OC'n.
Mong0ose
Will it blend?
+24|6959|UK

buLLet_t00th wrote:

Mong0ose wrote:

buLLet_t00th wrote:

I think this thread shows why Leet came up with the idea of 'Tech people'.
lmao
Its becasue of you and your fucking lame knowledge.

Does it make you sad that somebody knows something that you don't? Are you going to go cry to your mummy?

Kids on the internet!

joker8baller wrote:

How hard to overclock?
Its easy to OC. You can get an easy high OC on the E6850, but harder to do it on the Quad without decent cooling.
mature response, well done there

i've just read one review online so my knowledge is now on a par with bullet tooth

E6850 is the better option for gaming
joker8baller
Member
+68|7139
I'm not getting any more cooling that what comes with my case.

COOLER MASTER Stacker 830 Evolution... Will I be fine?

Anyways, can't find the 6850 anywhere ><

I won't be doing SLI.

Last edited by joker8baller (2007-07-22 13:28:46)

buLLet_t00th
Mr. Boombastic
+178|6915|Stealth City, UK

Mong0ose wrote:

buLLet_t00th wrote:

Mong0ose wrote:


lmao
Its becasue of you and your fucking lame knowledge.

Does it make you sad that somebody knows something that you don't? Are you going to go cry to your mummy?

Kids on the internet!

joker8baller wrote:

How hard to overclock?
Its easy to OC. You can get an easy high OC on the E6850, but harder to do it on the Quad without decent cooling.
mature response, well done there

i've just read one review online so my knowledge is now on a par with bullet tooth

E6850 is the better option for gaming
Could you explain why then?
buLLet_t00th
Mr. Boombastic
+178|6915|Stealth City, UK

joker8baller wrote:

I'm not getting any more cooling that what comes with my case.

COOLER MASTER Stacker 830 Evolution... Will I be fine?

Anyways, can't find the 6850 anywhere ><

I won't be doing SLI.
Well get the P35 board you said before, get the E6850 (when and if you can find it) and that case is the one I have, try and resist the people who say you should get the Antec 900.
ig
This topic seems to have no actual posts
+1,199|6995
so wait, sli doesnt work with the p35?
buLLet_t00th
Mr. Boombastic
+178|6915|Stealth City, UK

ig wrote:

so wait, sli doesnt work with the p35?
Nope, just ATi Crossfire.
joker8baller
Member
+68|7139
Roger. P35, and a E6850. Should I overclock the 6850?
buLLet_t00th
Mr. Boombastic
+178|6915|Stealth City, UK

joker8baller wrote:

Roger. P35, and a E6850. Should I overclock the 6850?
It should be enough straight out of the box. Cooling is going to be the major problem if you do decide to OC, but a decent cooler isn't too much money and is a lot better than the stock one.
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|7022|UK

joker8baller wrote:

Roger. P35, and a E6850. Should I overclock the 6850?
Sure, but 3GHZ not enough for you like ?

Martyn
joker8baller
Member
+68|7139
Gotcha. Ty for help.
ig
This topic seems to have no actual posts
+1,199|6995
so whats the best motherboard if im gonna get either the q6600 or e6850 and i might want sli in the future. i will play crysis when it comes out, if its good, and i play bf2 right now. i mainly just game and surf the internet so keep that in mind.
buLLet_t00th
Mr. Boombastic
+178|6915|Stealth City, UK

ig wrote:

so whats the best motherboard if im gonna get either the q6600 or e6850 and i might want sli in the future. i will play crysis when it comes out, if its good, and i play bf2 right now. i mainly just game and surf the internet so keep that in mind.
Obviously has to be a Nvidia chipset. The E6850 definetly needs the 680i version, but the Q6600 will work with 680i and everything up from 650i.
gvers
Bad at BF:BC2
+109|7145|The Real World

At the end of the day you can't future proof anything you buy the best you can afford that is available now. There are always new processors, boards, memory and graphics cards on the horizon. So most of this thread is a waste of space

Last edited by gvers (2007-07-22 14:27:24)

Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|7022|UK

E6850, and clock the hell out of it

Martyn
Smithereener
Member
+138|6788|California
Holy crap, I'm no tech expert, but all this (near)flaming is pretty ridiculous.

1. Regarding the E6850 and the Q6600, they're both the same price/relatively similar price, so I don't understand why it's stupid to get the Q6600 if it's got more multitasking potential. Just because they play only games? Who knows, maybe they'll want to make a video of themselves playing or something. Or other processor heavy tasks. Plus, having clock speeds over 3Ghz is pretty much just another way of increasing your e-peen for normal users right? (Then again, this is coming from a guy that barely ever upgrades. Only makes major changes due to lack of funding. )

2. I thought there was no such thing as futureproof, or am I wrong? Yet all these arguments talk about futureproofing, anyone care to elaborate please?

3. Making mistakes is a part of learning. But you need to have an good attitude about it to get anything out of making mistakes. So, for the ones here that say STFU or GTFO (exaggerations, don't worry) due to advice you think is somewhat bad, calm down. And for the ones that keep laughing off other advice/viewpoints, maybe try listening to some of that advice for future reference or something, don't just keep making flamebait.

Anyway, last time I checked newegg didn't have the E6850, so that kind of narrows down your choice. (Unless you found some other place that has the E6850 in stock)
buLLet_t00th
Mr. Boombastic
+178|6915|Stealth City, UK

Smithereener wrote:

Holy crap, I'm no tech expert, but all this (near)flaming is pretty ridiculous.

1. Regarding the E6850 and the Q6600, they're both the same price/relatively similar price, so I don't understand why it's stupid to get the Q6600 if it's got more multitasking potential. Just because they play only games? Who knows, maybe they'll want to make a video of themselves playing or something. Or other processor heavy tasks. Plus, having clock speeds over 3Ghz is pretty much just another way of increasing your e-peen for normal users right? (Then again, this is coming from a guy that barely ever upgrades. Only makes major changes due to lack of funding. )

2. I thought there was no such thing as futureproof, or am I wrong? Yet all these arguments talk about futureproofing, anyone care to elaborate please?

3. Making mistakes is a part of learning. But you need to have an good attitude about it to get anything out of making mistakes. So, for the ones here that say STFU or GTFO (exaggerations, don't worry) due to advice you think is somewhat bad, calm down. And for the ones that keep laughing off other advice/viewpoints, maybe try listening to some of that advice for future reference or something, don't just keep making flamebait.

Anyway, last time I checked newegg didn't have the E6850, so that kind of narrows down your choice. (Unless you found some other place that has the E6850 in stock)
(As this is obviously aimed at me) What you're saying here is totally true. When I talked about futureproof, its in relation to the Mobo, getting a P35 over a 680i is in his interest as one will work with the upcoming 45nm CPU's and one wont.

For what he wants to do, the E6850 is better at it than the Q6600 so in my opinion (and thats all it is) I'd get that over the Quad.

I wouldn't be suprised if tommorrow or in the coming weeks the E6850 will be available in the US.

So I don't hold anything against you, I just found it annoying and not very helpful that people (mong00se) shoot their mouthes off about stuff they have no interest in, let alone any knowlege!

Edit: Anyway....I'm off to bed because I've got a shit early start at work tommorrow. Peace!

Last edited by buLLet_t00th (2007-07-22 14:54:28)

Smithereener
Member
+138|6788|California

buLLet_t00th wrote:

Smithereener wrote:

Holy crap, I'm no tech expert, but all this (near)flaming is pretty ridiculous.

1. Regarding the E6850 and the Q6600, they're both the same price/relatively similar price, so I don't understand why it's stupid to get the Q6600 if it's got more multitasking potential. Just because they play only games? Who knows, maybe they'll want to make a video of themselves playing or something. Or other processor heavy tasks. Plus, having clock speeds over 3Ghz is pretty much just another way of increasing your e-peen for normal users right? (Then again, this is coming from a guy that barely ever upgrades. Only makes major changes due to lack of funding. )

2. I thought there was no such thing as futureproof, or am I wrong? Yet all these arguments talk about futureproofing, anyone care to elaborate please?

3. Making mistakes is a part of learning. But you need to have an good attitude about it to get anything out of making mistakes. So, for the ones here that say STFU or GTFO (exaggerations, don't worry) due to advice you think is somewhat bad, calm down. And for the ones that keep laughing off other advice/viewpoints, maybe try listening to some of that advice for future reference or something, don't just keep making flamebait.

Anyway, last time I checked newegg didn't have the E6850, so that kind of narrows down your choice. (Unless you found some other place that has the E6850 in stock)
(As this is obviously aimed at me) What you're saying here is totally true. When I talked about futureproof, its in relation to the Mobo, getting a P35 over a 680i is in his interest as one will work with the upcoming 45nm CPU's and one wont.

For what he wants to do, the E6850 is better at it than the Q6600 so in my opinion (and thats all it is) I'd get that over the Quad.

I wouldn't be suprised if tommorrow or in the coming weeks the E6850 will be available in the US.

So I don't hold anything against you, I just found it annoying and not very helpful that people (mong00se) shoot their mouthes off about stuff they have no interest in, let alone any knowlege!

Edit: Anyway....I'm off to bed because I've got a shit early start at work tommorrow. Peace!
I'd be lying if I said some of the references weren't made towards you, but part of it goes to mong00se and a few others. (Sorry if you thought I was blaming you for something) I know a fair amount of stuff regarding tech (mostly monkey see, monkey do-esque), but probably not enough. I don't mind seeing that one person strongly believes in something but when people start flinging poo at each other, it does get somewhat annoying, because pretty soon the whole thread becomes an "you're an idiot" type thing and I don't get anything out of it.

I can see where the E6850 arguments are coming from so I honestly am not sure, but using my spectacular caveman logic (4>2 dhurrr), I'd think the Q6600 was better overall.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7054|SE London

I really think you'd be a lot better off with a Q6600 than an E6850. They have much more power when it counts. Older applications will, on the whole, run very nicely on either CPU, but newer stuff, heavily optimised for multiple cores, will run better on the Q6600.

There are certainly areas in which the 6850 will outperform the Q6600, most in fact, but the quad core will be a lot faster on applications that are optimised for it. New versions of most CPU intensive applications will run better on quad cores and many older programs will run identically on both.

Since you want it for gaming and CPU intensive games are now becomng optimised for quad cores, the quad core would be the better choice. To get an idea of the potential benefits just look at the differing performance in gaming benchmarks that do utilise all four cores, like 3DMark06 - where I assume the Q6600 beats the E6850 by a fair amount.

Games that are not highly CPU intensive, which accounts for the vast majority of them, will not need to be optimised for quad cores, based on the assumption they will run perfectly well on any available quad core CPU without utilising all the cores.

Last edited by Bertster7 (2007-07-22 15:09:16)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard