Wouldn't it be neat to have a missile unlock for the AT kit? I was thinking something similar to the RPG-7 of SF, where no guiding is necessary, just shoot off, take cover and hope it hits something.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- New Anti-Tank missile unlock, hold the SMGs (idea)
wouldnt that be worse tho? lol spose u could make it higher powered
you know you can shoot the missile without guiding it? Just don't zoom in
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
eryx's are like RPGs because if you just zoom in, fire, and don't hold the fire key it won't wire guide automatically like the SRAW
I thought it was still guided when shot from the hip. Because whenever I try to take down a tank unzoomed, I strafe to cover, and the missile seems to follow my movement.max wrote:
you know you can shoot the missile without guiding it? Just don't zoom in
switch to the smg or Dao, and it wontCyrax-Sektor wrote:
I thought it was still guided when shot from the hip. Because whenever I try to take down a tank unzoomed, I strafe to cover, and the missile seems to follow my movement.max wrote:
you know you can shoot the missile without guiding it? Just don't zoom in
u can still guide itmax wrote:
you know you can shoot the missile without guiding it? Just don't zoom in
missiles from the SRAW and Eryx are guided regardless if they are shot from the hip or not.
RPG-7 for life.. any1 here ever gotten 3 guys in 1 rocket? I have a cpl of times Muhhahaha cuz im so uberskilled
RPG-7 FTW.
Fire and forget and reloads faster.
Fire and forget and reloads faster.
An AT-4/M-136 or SMAW would be nice for USMC, and the Chinese could have this thing, the FHJ-84,
And old school recoiless rifle would be nice, dont think any have been made since anti-rockets came of age, but theyed serve a dual pourpose, anti tank, and antiinfantry, albeit slow firing and heavy recoil, but when targeting a tank you would getting the lock on tone, leaving no chance to deploy smoke and excape.
Would be nice with a new unlock for air defence.
Planes and helis are to powerful in BF2 so give all Anti Tankers a few Air rockets too.
Would be nice to have against all those spawn killing helipilots!
Planes and helis are to powerful in BF2 so give all Anti Tankers a few Air rockets too.
Would be nice to have against all those spawn killing helipilots!
I'll see that and raise you two barrels.M.O.A.B wrote:
An AT-4/M-136 or SMAW would be nice for USMC, and the Chinese could have this thing, the FHJ-84,
http://bbs.sg169.com/user/user_file/1/f … 133808.jpg
M202A1 FLASH 66mm (x4). Rockets are filled with what is basically napalm.
How about a mortar, its not really an AT weapon, but still cool.
USMC should have an unlock AT-4
they have it in PR its so fun to shoot
they have it in PR its so fun to shoot
Yeah, well, you guys keep dreaming about AT weapon unlocks because Dice doesn't really care about BF2 anymore.
What do you want? The games 2 years old and dieing, be glad EA supported it as long as they have, after BF2 came out all support for BFV dropped literally the next day.firebolt5 wrote:
Yeah, well, you guys keep dreaming about AT weapon unlocks because Dice doesn't really care about BF2 anymore.
I seriously miss the mortar, loved it 1942/BFV sad it didnt make the transition over to BF2.daffytag wrote:
How about a mortar, its not really an AT weapon, but still cool.
Last edited by r2zoo (2007-07-25 07:20:39)
Oh yes we need that, only ever seen one used in the movie Commando, awesome. Also I would like to see a man-portable FIM-92 Stinger, I could have really used one on Wake the other day.k30dxedle wrote:
I'll see that and raise you two barrels.M.O.A.B wrote:
An AT-4/M-136 or SMAW would be nice for USMC, and the Chinese could have this thing, the FHJ-84,
http://bbs.sg169.com/user/user_file/1/f … 133808.jpg
http://www.bellum.nu/armoury/M202A1.jpg
M202A1 FLASH 66mm (x4). Rockets are filled with what is basically napalm.
Last edited by M.O.A.B (2007-07-25 07:27:08)
Classic manoeuvre on warlord. Actually hit someone once. Funny as fuck.Cyrax-Sektor wrote:
just shoot off, take cover and hope it hits something.
But yeah, the RPg idea is good, however EA never listens to consumers, except those of relatives...
I would like to see the RPG-7 or a Stinger as an unlock. For obvious reasons. I far prefer the RPG over medium-short range than the vanilla equivalent.
Reloads far faster, flies faster, no lock on tone etc.
And i dont even need to say why i'd like a handheld Stinger.
Reloads far faster, flies faster, no lock on tone etc.
And i dont even need to say why i'd like a handheld Stinger.
POE2, the new version has them now. So great. I love it. Absolutely fabulous for defending a flag without getting a brick of lead shoved up your ass. Takes a little bit of getting used to but still. I honestly think POE2 is better than BF2. It has more maps (or at least the same amount) as BF2 and all the expansions put together. Way more realistic. Looks better. They've added things light thunder and lightning to a map, they now have they're version of Wake with SAM's(?) on the carrier (basically mini UAV's filled with high explosives you launch from carrier), finally, mobile artillery to battlefield, and ,of course, mortars. Anyone else think its better? With the exception, of course, to the fact that a lot of the servers are german which gives me high ping all the way from Cali.r2zoo wrote:
What do you want? The games 2 years old and dieing, be glad EA supported it as long as they have, after BF2 came out all support for BFV dropped literally the next day.firebolt5 wrote:
Yeah, well, you guys keep dreaming about AT weapon unlocks because Dice doesn't really care about BF2 anymore.I seriously miss the mortar, loved it 1942/BFV sad it didn't make the transition over to BF2.daffytag wrote:
How about a mortar, its not really an AT weapon, but still cool.
No you would not like one. Damn DICE would nerf that shit so much from all the complaining 8-year-olds getting shot out of there precious J-10's that they think they have U83R 1337 $k!77$ in. It would take 4 missiles, at least, to kill something.TheGiantSE wrote:
Would be nice with a new unlock for air defence.
Planes and helis are to powerful in BF2 so give all Anti Tankers a few Air rockets too.
Would be nice to have against all those spawn killing helipilots!
Woohoo !k30dxedle wrote:
I'll see that and raise you two barrels.M.O.A.B wrote:
An AT-4/M-136 or SMAW would be nice for USMC, and the Chinese could have this thing, the FHJ-84,
http://bbs.sg169.com/user/user_file/1/f … 133808.jpg
http://www.bellum.nu/armoury/M202A1.jpg
M202A1 FLASH 66mm (x4). Rockets are filled with what is basically napalm.
Commando man !!
Winnar.aj0404 wrote:
missiles from the SRAW and Eryx are guided regardless if they are shot from the hip or not.
This response wins THE#LORD#OF#SRAWs seal of approval.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- New Anti-Tank missile unlock, hold the SMGs (idea)