Protecus
Prophet of Certain Certainties
+28|6964
Four men that were framed by the FBI and sentenced to life in jail finally had their sentences commuted and received a settlement from the government for $101.7 million. Unfortunately, they had already spend 30 years in jail, having been convicted in 1965. Two of the men survived to see their freedom granted. The other two had died in prison.

According to court documents, the FBI actively supported perjury (knowingly lying in court under oath) and even assisted in framing the four men. They then purposefully withheld information that would have proved their innocence. The FBI officially chalked them up as "acceptable collateral damage".

While this makes me furious to the point of incapacitation, it brings up an interesting point.

At the time, the FBI was in the process of trying to take down the mob bosses of country. While four innocent men were convicted of murder and lost 3 Decades of their lives, they justified it as the cost of helping the greater good.

In an age where we are constantly asked to sacrifice our civil liberties in the name of a safer country, some given by the very constitution our society is built upon, at what point is enough, enough? Where is the line drawn, where we give up so much that the very thing we have fought so hard to protect, a free society and the ability to enjoy individual freedom, no longer exists?

Now that is a $101 million question
golgoj4
Member
+51|7216|North Hollywood
This clearly crosses the line. Knowingly framing innocent people has no place in a a democracy. I don't see how this helped anyone.
Luigi
Sniper Whore
+97|6621|Wisconsin

golgoj4 wrote:

This clearly crosses the line. Knowingly framing innocent people has no place in a a democracy. I don't see how this helped anyone.
Couldn't say it better
Protecus
Prophet of Certain Certainties
+28|6964

golgoj4 wrote:

This clearly crosses the line. Knowingly framing innocent people has no place in a a democracy. I don't see how this helped anyone.
I didn't include it in the OP, but the FBI had framed the men to protect a known hitman from the courts because he was an informant to the mob. Even though the hitman had done the killing, the four innocent men had taken the rap. So while this could be argued as possibly making the country a safer place, again, where is the moral line.

"Enemy Combatants" come to mind....

Last edited by Protecus (2007-07-26 12:53:12)

maxwell777
Member
+27|6708|Doncaster, UK
Off subject... but I'm liking your sig Protecus!
Protecus
Prophet of Certain Certainties
+28|6964
Ha ha, thanks. I'm into it.

Last edited by Protecus (2007-07-26 13:01:21)

TrollmeaT
Aspiring Objectivist
+492|7114|Colorado
truely sickening.
DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+796|7127|United States of America
Still, that's $847,500 from each year in prison for each of the four.
Bull3t
stephen brule
+83|6744
That's Horrible.
Maj.Do
Member
+85|7194|good old CA
that is just wrong.  framing 4 innocent people to protect a single informant?
What is wrong with the CIA/FBI nowadays
Protecus
Prophet of Certain Certainties
+28|6964

DesertFox- wrote:

Still, that's $847,500 from each year in prison for each of the four.
Oh yea, totally worth it.

Especially for the two that died.
pirana6
Go Cougs!
+697|6733|Washington St.
I'm sorry but no amount of money can buy me 30 (40?) years of my life. None.

Time is the one thing you can't buy.
PureFodder
Member
+225|6727
Good job they didn't get a death penalty.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7204

Protecus wrote:

In an age where we are constantly asked to sacrifice our civil liberties in the name of a safer country, some given by the very constitution our society is built upon, at what point is enough, enough? Where is the line drawn, where we give up so much that the very thing we have fought so hard to protect, a free society and the ability to enjoy individual freedom, no longer exists?

Now that is a $101 million question
First: This was 1965.

Second: I would want more money if I were them.

Third: It is fucked up.

Fourth: If you think you live in a free society..................
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6942|so randum

pirana6 wrote:

Time is the one thing you can't buy.
Couldn't agree more tbh
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7093|USA

Protecus wrote:

Four men that were framed by the FBI and sentenced to life in jail finally had their sentences commuted and received a settlement from the government for $101.7 million. Unfortunately, they had already spend 30 years in jail, having been convicted in 1965. Two of the men survived to see their freedom granted. The other two had died in prison.

According to court documents, the FBI actively supported perjury (knowingly lying in court under oath) and even assisted in framing the four men. They then purposefully withheld information that would have proved their innocence. The FBI officially chalked them up as "acceptable collateral damage".

While this makes me furious to the point of incapacitation, it brings up an interesting point.

At the time, the FBI was in the process of trying to take down the mob bosses of country. While four innocent men were convicted of murder and lost 3 Decades of their lives, they justified it as the cost of helping the greater good.

In an age where we are constantly asked to sacrifice our civil liberties in the name of a safer country, some given by the very constitution our society is built upon, at what point is enough, enough? Where is the line drawn, where we give up so much that the very thing we have fought so hard to protect, a free society and the ability to enjoy individual freedom, no longer exists?

Now that is a $101 million question
Although I find this reprehensible, please tell me EXACTLY, what sacrifices YOU have made, or what the govt. has done that has affected YOU specifically, in their efforts to gather intel.
Protecus
Prophet of Certain Certainties
+28|6964

usmarine2005 wrote:

Protecus wrote:

In an age where we are constantly asked to sacrifice our civil liberties in the name of a safer country, some given by the very constitution our society is built upon, at what point is enough, enough? Where is the line drawn, where we give up so much that the very thing we have fought so hard to protect, a free society and the ability to enjoy individual freedom, no longer exists?

Now that is a $101 million question
First: This was 1965.

Second: I would want more money if I were them.

Third: It is fucked up.

Fourth: If you think you live in a free society..................
1) Yes, it was 1965. But it seems some things never change. Only now they don't even bother trying to cover it up, they just lock people away without even a trial or explanation.

2) Yes, 101 million isn't even close to 30 years lost

3) QFT

4) Thats the battle flag that is constantly being waved, which is the irony. Every day we are reminded that it is freedom that we are fighting for.

Unfortunately, it's possible that we are being rallied to defend an ideal that no longer exists.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7204

Protecus wrote:

Unfortunately, it's possible that we are being rallied to defend an ideal that no longer exists.
What about all the people who were killed by mob bosses?  What about their freedom?  What about the people being extorted by the mob?  What about their freedom?

It is a thin line for them to walk and sometimes they cross it.  It is the world we live in.  Once people stop doing bad things, bad things like this wouldn't happen anymore.
Protecus
Prophet of Certain Certainties
+28|6964

lowing wrote:

Protecus wrote:

Four men that were framed by the FBI and sentenced to life in jail finally had their sentences commuted and received a settlement from the government for $101.7 million. Unfortunately, they had already spend 30 years in jail, having been convicted in 1965. Two of the men survived to see their freedom granted. The other two had died in prison.

According to court documents, the FBI actively supported perjury (knowingly lying in court under oath) and even assisted in framing the four men. They then purposefully withheld information that would have proved their innocence. The FBI officially chalked them up as "acceptable collateral damage".

While this makes me furious to the point of incapacitation, it brings up an interesting point.

At the time, the FBI was in the process of trying to take down the mob bosses of country. While four innocent men were convicted of murder and lost 3 Decades of their lives, they justified it as the cost of helping the greater good.

In an age where we are constantly asked to sacrifice our civil liberties in the name of a safer country, some given by the very constitution our society is built upon, at what point is enough, enough? Where is the line drawn, where we give up so much that the very thing we have fought so hard to protect, a free society and the ability to enjoy individual freedom, no longer exists?

Now that is a $101 million question
Although I find this reprehensible, please tell me EXACTLY, what sacrifices YOU have made, or what the govt. has done that has affected YOU specifically, in their efforts to gather intel.
So I have to be affected personally to justify caring?

Essentially, I have to be completely selfish in order to have any say in the matter?

I have lost some of the rights guaranteed to me by the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments. No longer are they my unalienable rights. Now they are present at the convenience of the government.

But have I been falsely imprisoned, no.

Not yet
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7093|USA

Protecus wrote:

lowing wrote:

Protecus wrote:

Four men that were framed by the FBI and sentenced to life in jail finally had their sentences commuted and received a settlement from the government for $101.7 million. Unfortunately, they had already spend 30 years in jail, having been convicted in 1965. Two of the men survived to see their freedom granted. The other two had died in prison.

According to court documents, the FBI actively supported perjury (knowingly lying in court under oath) and even assisted in framing the four men. They then purposefully withheld information that would have proved their innocence. The FBI officially chalked them up as "acceptable collateral damage".

While this makes me furious to the point of incapacitation, it brings up an interesting point.

At the time, the FBI was in the process of trying to take down the mob bosses of country. While four innocent men were convicted of murder and lost 3 Decades of their lives, they justified it as the cost of helping the greater good.

In an age where we are constantly asked to sacrifice our civil liberties in the name of a safer country, some given by the very constitution our society is built upon, at what point is enough, enough? Where is the line drawn, where we give up so much that the very thing we have fought so hard to protect, a free society and the ability to enjoy individual freedom, no longer exists?

Now that is a $101 million question
Although I find this reprehensible, please tell me EXACTLY, what sacrifices YOU have made, or what the govt. has done that has affected YOU specifically, in their efforts to gather intel.
So I have to be affected personally to justify caring?

Essentially, I have to be completely selfish in order to have any say in the matter?

I have lost some of the rights guaranteed to me by the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments. No longer are they my unalienable rights. Now they are present at the convenience of the government.

But have I been falsely imprisoned, no.

Not yet
You said "WE were constantly asked to sacrifice our civil liberties in the name of a safer country". Well, I can not think of a single civil liberty that I have had to give up. So you tell me, what have you been asked to sacrifice? What sacrifices have you made? How has your life been affected by all of your unselfish sacrificing??

Last edited by lowing (2007-07-26 16:02:30)

DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+796|7127|United States of America

Protecus wrote:

DesertFox- wrote:

Still, that's $847,500 from each year in prison for each of the four.
Oh yea, totally worth it.

Especially for the two that died.
Hey, they probably weren't making that much on the outside. Nevertheless, they probably care more about their families and lives than what they could've been doing without that kind of scratch.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,072|7214|PNW

Protecus wrote:

they justified it as the cost of helping the greater good.
https://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y76/unnamednewbie13/tau.jpg
As is propah!

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard