yes?djphetal wrote:
commie.S3v3N wrote:
This thread wins.
Last edited by CommieChipmunk (2007-08-03 14:48:45)
This person has a name.... And I think I know it....djphetal wrote:
so, we have usmarine posting an alleged highway to nowhere, when in fact it goes to Hawaii.
Hawaii
The Minnesota Twins
Construction Workers
Jews
Mexicans
Trannies
The Government.
This all leads to one person...
one... nameless... person.
(gasp) CDogMN!
Edit: LOL 2 posts up beat me to it
Last edited by Beyond_Parallax (2007-08-03 14:49:17)
I must go work. I am a Lead Activist for PETA. I will discuss some of your ideas with a few of my brilliant coworkers while we also save innocent animals, and when I return in a few hours I will bring you my one and final theory. It will probably be presented in a slide show with a crazy celebrity's voice over and vague facts and misinformation. In the meantime, no one drive over any bridges. It's not safe.
Now how in the shit did this make it to page 3?
come on give bush more credit. he wouldnt go from 9/11 to the bridge collapse. And if he did, the first things even mentioned about the bridge would have been terrorism. It was just time for the bridge to be replaced. Plus if it was bush, their would have been more deaths, more damage, and another reason to keep throwing our tax money at a war, no one gives a shit about but him. All we care about are our troops, and that they get back safe.
I thought he wanted him kicked of bfs2 im confused?djphetal wrote:
you're just jealous that he doesn't want YOU thrown in the slammer.SgtSlauther wrote:
omg this post alone should move this thread to the junk drawer.cryptofcolumbus wrote:
I hereby propose Gunslinger be kicked off BF2s for being the henchman of the United States government. You think you can bury our democratic movement without reprocussions? You will have a staring roll is LC2 sir, NO DOUBT ABOUT IT!
serious. if it wasnt an accident, bush would be responsible and be calling TERRORISM!! and throw more troops an money at the war. Which their not.Turquoise wrote:
common sense, perhaps?cryptofcolumbus wrote:
I am so serious. On an unserious note, why are they so quick to say it isn't terrorism?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
we're not really serious here, are we?
BF2s is the only free website on the internet. Thats why I've chosen to discuss the truth here. If you are kicked off this forum and are forced onto another its the exact same thing as going to jail. Your life will be under a mircoscope. We can do this guys! We must work together and ignore the real world.SgtSlauther wrote:
I thought he wanted him kicked of bfs2 im confused?djphetal wrote:
you're just jealous that he doesn't want YOU thrown in the slammer.SgtSlauther wrote:
omg this post alone should move this thread to the junk drawer.
Last edited by cryptofcolumbus (2007-08-03 14:53:25)
Chuck norris is a bitch, in fact hes my bitch=NHB=Shadow wrote:
I believe we are really serious.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
we're not really serious here, are we?
This is so serious, Chuck Norris wouldn't know what to do.
Sounds good. But I don't want to see a graph showing second by second bridge collapse information placed alongside a Cooked up graph of global CO2 levels over hundreds of years.dankassasin42o wrote:
come on give bush more credit. he wouldnt go from 9/11 to the bridge collapse. And if he did, the first things even mentioned about the bridge would have been terrorism. It was just time for the bridge to be replaced. Plus if it was bush, their would have been more deaths, more damage, and another reason to keep throwing our tax money at a war, no one gives a shit about but him. All we care about are our troops, and that they get back safe.
OMG! THE ENVIROMENT!!!!! YES~! YOU"RE BRILLIANT! I'M GONNA CALL MY FRIENDS AT ELF RIGHT NOW! TY SO MUCHBeyond_Parallax wrote:
Sounds good. But I don't want to see a graph showing second by second bridge collapse information placed alongside a Cooked up graph of global CO2 levels over hundreds of years.dankassasin42o wrote:
come on give bush more credit. he wouldnt go from 9/11 to the bridge collapse. And if he did, the first things even mentioned about the bridge would have been terrorism. It was just time for the bridge to be replaced. Plus if it was bush, their would have been more deaths, more damage, and another reason to keep throwing our tax money at a war, no one gives a shit about but him. All we care about are our troops, and that they get back safe.
This thread hurts my brain.
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
LOL don't mention it. while you're at it, call up the govt. of that island nation Vanatu. They might want to sue the ppl who built the bridge.cryptofcolumbus wrote:
OMG! THE ENVIROMENT!!!!! YES~! YOU"RE BRILLIANT! I'M GONNA CALL MY FRIENDS AT ELF RIGHT NOW! TY SO MUCHBeyond_Parallax wrote:
Sounds good. But I don't want to see a graph showing second by second bridge collapse information placed alongside a Cooked up graph of global CO2 levels over hundreds of years.dankassasin42o wrote:
come on give bush more credit. he wouldnt go from 9/11 to the bridge collapse. And if he did, the first things even mentioned about the bridge would have been terrorism. It was just time for the bridge to be replaced. Plus if it was bush, their would have been more deaths, more damage, and another reason to keep throwing our tax money at a war, no one gives a shit about but him. All we care about are our troops, and that they get back safe.
fuck
Im a henchman!
a label I dont mind
a label I dont mind
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2007-08-03 14:59:25)
QFT.usmarine2005 wrote:
fuck
I'm closing this now. Eat my shorts.
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
Alright Gunslinger, just for you, I'll re-open it. This has got to be one of the most retardedest conspiracy theories ever though, just for the record.
Carry on...
Carry on...
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
who is cryptofcolumbus? thats the real question.
Its not ikarti. I'll give you a clue who is though...Starts with O....GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
who is cryptofcolumbus? thats the real question.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Because it does not make sense as a terrorist target.cryptofcolumbus wrote:
I am so serious. On an unserious note, why are they so quick to say it isn't terrorism?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
we're not really serious here, are we?
IT wasnt..... come on... bush woulda been all over it, if it was. cuz first off. he would be responsible... 2nd with in 5mins of it collasping, there would have been a fabricated tape of bin laden claiming resposiblty to take blame off bush, just like 9/11 and within an hr after, there would have been another troop surge to iraq. to satisfy his war hunger...imortal wrote:
Because it does not make sense as a terrorist target.cryptofcolumbus wrote:
I am so serious. On an unserious note, why are they so quick to say it isn't terrorism?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
we're not really serious here, are we?
I am a combat engineer and there is such a thing called pallet strippers, that strip road surfaces to render a bridge unsafe.....makes me really fkn wonder. a pallet of pe4 /C4 can make a bridge fall!
ive watched it fall over an over, i didnt notice an explosives. Ive been a pryotechnician for 8 yrs. Taken 7 yrs of fire an explosives training. I know what to look for. But maybe im wrong...daddyofdeath wrote:
I am a combat engineer and there is such a thing called pallet strippers, that strip road surfaces to render a bridge unsafe.....makes me really fkn wonder. a pallet of pe4 /C4 can make a bridge fall!
Hmm.. i bet it were the Chinese.. or Russians.. preparing for an invasion! Watch out Seattle..
I said it before. I'll say it again.
Bridge Monster Hungry.
Bridge Monster Hungry.