While many Dems have been making statements about the dangers of Iraq having WMD's for a long time before and after 9/11, they didn't invade Iraq. GWB did. Are those who made those statements as guilty as GWB? Would Clinton have invaded Iraq if he was in charge when 9/11 took place? Would Gore? Is it the same thing saying it than doing it?
Pages: 1
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Dems making statements about Iraq Vs. GWB having his own private War
Poll
Is It The Same? Read before answering.
| Yes, both sides suck | 37% | 37% - 6 | ||||
| No, the Dems were tricked like Hillary said | 6% | 6% - 1 | ||||
| No, the Dems just made some statements | 12% | 12% - 2 | ||||
| No, the Dems are smarter and wouldn't have invaded | 6% | 6% - 1 | ||||
| No, the Dems don't have the balls to invade | 18% | 18% - 3 | ||||
| Other | 18% | 18% - 3 | ||||
| Total: 16 | ||||||
Actions speak louder than words.
Posting videos of politicans ranting is never a good idea....
Posting videos of politicans ranting is never a good idea....
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Both sides suck option for me, don't trust anybody in power, who knows what was and has been said behind closed doors, we only get a faction of the truth from the news.
I, of course voted the only yes option.
Democrats are all for wars, as long as they are their wars.
Democrats are all for wars, as long as they are their wars.
Maybe they'd have realised there was no connection between 9/11 and Iraq. And they might have demanded a tougher stance on terrorism from the Saudi and Pakistani Governments!
- I voted "other".
- I voted "other".
Last edited by Jepeto87 (2007-08-07 10:05:00)
Maybe on here that statement is correct, our words do not mean shit.m3thod wrote:
Actions speak louder than words.
Pages: 1
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Dems making statements about Iraq Vs. GWB having his own private War