E^9.Guarnere
Member
+1|7116
i was looking at screenshots and it looks like for the spec-ops they get supressors on the main guns (http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/ … amp;page=2)
maby for us in a later patch or update?
wht are ur thoughts
lavadisk
I am a cat ¦ 3
+369|7256|Denver colorado
how bout no. i dont want noobs talking about how they are good on a freaking noob console

ps. i hate the 360

Last edited by lavadisk (2006-02-05 16:41:51)

usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7188

lavadisk wrote:

how bout no. i dont want noobs talking about how they are good on a freaking noob console
What the hell does that have to do with the question?
lavadisk
I am a cat ¦ 3
+369|7256|Denver colorado
acutally. it dosent have any thing to do with it

BUT. supressors are cool. but why have a supressor for your carbine when you have a silenced pistol?
kilroy0097
Kilroy Is Here!
+81|7270|Bryan/College Station, TX

lavadisk wrote:

acutally. it dosent have any thing to do with it

BUT. supressors are cool. but why have a supressor for your carbine when you have a silenced pistol?
Did you aspire to become like this or were simply born in this state?

Obviously so you have a faster rate of fire, longer shot range and do it all with a silencer. That's why you should have a silencer for your carbine including one on your pistol. Kind of defeats the point of being a covert unit if you wake up the neighborhood killing badguys.
"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis
nordicfireman
Member
+7|7099
has anyone played the 360 version? i played it for a couple minutes in a store and it looked like a completely different game...not sure if that's good or bad, or what it was that was so different. i just drove a tank around and shot at infantry, it was pretty hard to aim. so yeah, anyone have opinions on it?
sheggalism
Member
+16|7169|France
Battlefield 2 X360 version is NOT Battlefield 2 from PC, but Battlefield 2 Modern Combat from PS2 and Xbox !
nordicfireman
Member
+7|7099
oh, well i suppose that explains it then
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7143
thats modern combat, and i see green barets... rangers are better. xbox 360 graphics sux in real gaming, have u seen COD 2 on it? no AA for 360
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
psychotoxic187
Member
+11|7136

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

thats modern combat, and i see green barets... rangers are better. xbox 360 graphics sux in real gaming, have u seen COD 2 on it? no AA for 360
What a bunch of dribble. COD2 looks just as good on the 360, as it does for the PC. Some reviews have even said it looks better. Also, there is to AA for the 360. The graphics card used in it, is ahead of the current generation of ATI cards. It is based off the R600 series.
I2elik
Member
+12|7179|Perth, Western Australia

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

thats modern combat, and i see green barets... rangers are better. xbox 360 graphics sux in real gaming, have u seen COD 2 on it? no AA for 360
Now why would a next-gen console not use AA, it's using a freaking high end video card, along with 3 CPU's, oh yes, no AA at all.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard