I wonder if Bush has a "Peace Advisor".
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2007-11-24 15:19:47)
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2007-11-24 15:19:47)
Yeah, land of the freeSEREMAKER wrote:
I think all males should do a required 2 years in service or 4 years in college
It must be one of those two.RECONDO67 wrote:
why college?
too scared or you think you are superior ?
Last edited by mikkel (2007-11-24 16:52:08)
The most terrifying part of that statement is the fact that there probably wouldn't be as much protesting as one would expect.SEREMAKER wrote:
if it goes into effect, I can't wait to see the protests
*breaks out tear gas ...................................................... with a grin*
Last edited by CommieChipmunk (2007-11-24 21:03:03)
In other news, im with seremaker. maybe not a combat role, but some sort of required service for at least 2 years.FEOS wrote:
All Lute's saying is that it's not "off the table." But then neither are nukes. Neither one is likely before Jan 09.
The administration is just saying that they are examining all options...one of which is starting up the draft. That doesn't mean they are seriously considering it, nor that the House or Senate would vote it through should it get recommended.
Calm down, take a step back from the ledge and go ahead and get ready for the high school dance.
Last edited by golgoj4 (2007-11-24 19:40:52)
conscription? Never in the United States.golgoj4 wrote:
In other news, im with seremaker. maybe not a combat role, but some sort of required service for at least 2 years.FEOS wrote:
All Lute's saying is that it's not "off the table." But then neither are nukes. Neither one is likely before Jan 09.
The administration is just saying that they are examining all options...one of which is starting up the draft. That doesn't mean they are seriously considering it, nor that the House or Senate would vote it through should it get recommended.
Calm down, take a step back from the ledge and go ahead and get ready for the high school dance.
yeah i know. im the life of the partystryyker wrote:
conscription? Never in the United States.golgoj4 wrote:
In other news, im with seremaker. maybe not a combat role, but some sort of required service for at least 2 years.FEOS wrote:
All Lute's saying is that it's not "off the table." But then neither are nukes. Neither one is likely before Jan 09.
The administration is just saying that they are examining all options...one of which is starting up the draft. That doesn't mean they are seriously considering it, nor that the House or Senate would vote it through should it get recommended.
Calm down, take a step back from the ledge and go ahead and get ready for the high school dance.
Supposedly, Canada will now put out a lot more effort to deport draft dodgers and deserters than they did before. They signed some kind of agreement with our government.Mitch wrote:
Everyone would move to Canada/Mexico to avoid it, then they would be Draft dodgers and wouldnt they be forced to live there because if they came back isnt it like Severe punishment?
I kinda remember it was something harsh like Life in prison or the death penalty