Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6884|The Land of Scott Walker
http://www.suntimes.com/lifestyles/heal … 25.article

Scientists say they have reprogrammed human skin cells so they behave like embryonic stem cells. If the work overcomes hurdles, the breakthrough could benefit science without the controversy that has dogged stem cell research. The work appeared in two prestigious journals, Cell and Science.

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20071124/fob1.asp

In an advance that could solve many of the ethical and technical issues involved in stem cell research, two groups of scientists have independently converted human skin cells directly into stem cells without creating or destroying embryos. "We are now in a position to be able to generate patient- and disease-specific stem cells without using human eggs or embryos," Shinya Yamanaka, leader of one of the research teams at Kyoto University in Japan, said in an e-mail interview.

Preliminary tests show that the newly created cells can develop into nerve cells, heart cells, or any other kind of cell in the body. Previously, only stem cells taken from early embryos had this kind of flexibility, called pluripotency. Scientists have suggested that such embryonic stem cells could be used for learning about genetic diseases, testing new drugs on cells grown in the lab, or growing healthy cells for therapeutic transplantation. 
Producing embryonic stem cells has become controversial, however, because the process destroys the embryo.  "[Our] whole procedure doesn't involve any embryo," says Junying Yu, leader of the other research group, at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. "This approach is certainly going to get rid of this [ethical] problem."

The new technique wouldn't be suitable for medical therapies because it uses viruses to inject genes into the cells' DNA. Such viruses insert the genes at random locations, sometimes causing mutations that can lead to cancer. Several research groups are working on other ways to deliver genes into the cells, and developing safer techniques to do so shouldn't be difficult, observes Jeanne F. Loring, a stem cell researcher at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, Calif.  Both research groups used human skin cells called fibroblasts, chosen because they grow rapidly and are easy to obtain. Yamanaka's group used skin cells taken from a woman's face, and Yu's team used cells from a newborn's foreskin. Acquiring fibroblasts from a patient would require only shallow penetration of the skin.

The research teams each grew samples containing hundreds of thousands of skin cells in a dish, and then used viruses to carry genes into the cells. These genes are active in embryonic stem cells but switched off in skin cells. Each team used a different combination of four genes, but two of the genes—OCT4 and SOX2—were common to both experiments. The genes work by controlling the activity of many others. 
After 12 to 25 days, the injected genes had transformed some of the skin cells into cells with all of the key characteristics of embryonic stem cells, the teams report in upcoming issues of Cell and Science.  "If you didn't know where they came from, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between these [cells] and true human embryonic stem cells," Yu says.  The experiments each produced between 10 and 35 converted cells, called induced pluripotent stem cells. So a single skin sample can produce several stem cell lines.  "This will be the way people" make stem cells, concludes Loring.
---------
Thoughts?

Edit: Ok, I'll change the question.  Do you think this will stop embryonic stem cell research?

Last edited by Stingray24 (2007-11-25 08:42:11)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6844|North Carolina
If we can adapt adult cells easily to the same capabilities as embryonic ones, then yes.  I wouldn't see any reason why embryonic research would continue here.

One thing to keep in mind though is that embryonic stem cell research is not as big of a controversy in other countries.  Singapore is a good example of a country where research continues onward in this field without any big conflicts.

As long as there is a controversy involved in this research and many other fields of science here, we will slowly lose much of the biotechnological edge we have to countries more concerned about pragmatism than so-called ethics.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6884|The Land of Scott Walker
After all the controversy over this subject, no more comments?  Interesting . . .
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|7104|NT, like Mick Dundee

Never saw how embryonic stem cell research was offensive to people's ethics to be honest.

I mean, it's far, far, far better ethically than say masturbating or wet dreams. Or having a period. Aren't they all 'murder' too? At least stem cell research had a point.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Cougar
Banned
+1,962|7203|Dallas

Flecco wrote:

Never saw how embryonic stem cell research was offensive to people's ethics to be honest.

I mean, it's far, far, far better ethically than say masturbating or wet dreams. Or having a period. Aren't they all 'murder' too? At least stem cell research had a point.
Masturbation has a point.


It keeps people from raping other, weaker, and much hotter people.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard