toutinette
Member
+2|6698|Canada
VS OR AGAINST?
REALLY

If no death penalty, when people come out, they go rampage but if there is death penalty, it woud be carnage!
discuss:
.:ronin:.|Patton
Respekct dad i love u always
+946|7247|Marathon, Florida Keys
why should we pay for the care of murders, rapists, and child molesters in jail? Get rid of them all.
https://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g117/patton1337/stats.jpg
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6843|North Carolina
Um...  I'm guessing English is his second language....

Anyway, like most things, it's conditional.  Sometimes, the death penalty is appropriate.  The main problem with it is that it is ridiculously expensive.
Cougar
Banned
+1,962|7202|Dallas

toutinette wrote:

VS OR AGAINST?
REALLY

If no death penalty, when people come out, they go rampage but if there is death penalty, it woud be carnage!
discuss:
i THINK IT WUD BE GOODER IF THEY JUST SENT EVRYONE INTIO THE OCEANS AND MADE MAKE THEM DROWNED,, INSTEAD OF HAVEING THEM INSIDE TEH PRISONS WERE THEY JUST EAT UP THE TAXPAYERES MONEYS AND EAT THERE FOOD, lol, THEY SHOULD JUST PUT THE BAD GUYS IN THE OCEANS AND THEN LET THEM DROWND,,!!!!!!

imho
m3thod
All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz
+2,197|7109|UK
fire em into space.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Dragonclaw
Member
+186|6743|Florida

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

why should we pay for the care of murders, rapists, and child molesters in jail? Get rid of them all.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6591|what

I'd rather see the bastards spend the rest of their pointless miserable lives in prison, getting raped in the showers and have the gaurds beat them frequently.

A bullet is too good for them.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|7068|Washington, DC

TheAussieReaper wrote:

I'd rather see the bastards spend the rest of their pointless miserable lives in prison, getting raped in the showers and have the gaurds beat them frequently.

A bullet is too good for them.
waste of money
Cleft
Member
+2|6575|Pacific Northwest
Someone did a presentation about this in speech class last year. If i recall it is more expensive to execute somebody than to jail them for life on average.
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7128|Tampa Bay Florida

Cleft wrote:

Someone did a presentation about this in speech class last year. If i recall it is more expensive to execute somebody than to jail them for life on average.
Yes, true.

My dad represents death penalty inmates in Florida.  You would not believe the amount of shit that people don't know about the issue that would make them staunchly against the death penalty.
krazed
Admiral of the Bathtub
+619|7218|Great Brown North

Spearhead wrote:

Cleft wrote:

Someone did a presentation about this in speech class last year. If i recall it is more expensive to execute somebody than to jail them for life on average.
Yes, true.

My dad represents death penalty inmates in Florida.  You would not believe the amount of shit that people don't know about the issue that would make them staunchly against the death penalty.
examples? im interested
RAIMIUS
You with the face!
+244|7152|US
The death penalty is too expensive in the US.  Let 'em rot.
Kneegra
Don't rock no blings but my baseball cap
+21|6866|IN
why do the needles have to be sterilized? they're gonna die anyway...
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6883|The Land of Scott Walker
^^ He has a point there.
Drakef
Cheeseburger Logicist
+117|6800|Vancouver
I am morally against the death penalty.
Jibbles
Rifle Expert
+56|7067|Mexifornia, USA
Here, they're debating the death penalty because they don't know if the convicted felon feels pain when he is put to death via lethal injection. Since he has been sentenced to the death penalty already, and probably committed some horrendous crime, I'm no longer concerned with his well being or  comfort. What difference does it make if he "feels" OK when he dies? He's fuckin' dead! He no longer has the ability to care or protest, and if people are so concerned and not sure if they feel pain, well then by all means give it a try! The last thing we need to pay for is to try and "rehabilitate" some disgusting form of human life. He fucked up big time. Too fucking bad. It only encourages capital crimes to be committed, since these horrible criminals are treated as the victims, as soon as an attorney mentions "troubled childhood", sufficient punishment goes right out the door. I love our legal system...


BTW, Utah is the only state that has a firing squad as an option of death. There's a specific reason as to why. Karma for first person to correctly answer..
Roger Lesboules
Ah ben tabarnak!
+316|7015|Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Québec!

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

why should we pay for the care of murders, rapists, and child molesters in jail? Get rid of them all.
This man, speaks the words of wisdom!
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,992|7070|949

Roger Lesboules wrote:

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

why should we pay for the care of murders, rapists, and child molesters in jail? Get rid of them all.
This man, speaks the words of wisdom!
Because sometimes people that are looking at the death penalty for murder, rape and molestation are not guilty.

Death Penalty should be restricted for mass murderers and sociopathic murderers - People that cannot function in modern society.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7113|Canberra, AUS

Dragonclaw wrote:

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

why should we pay for the care of murders, rapists, and child molesters in jail? Get rid of them all.
You do realise that if often actually costs MORE to execute than to incarcerate someone (for life)?

Facts ftw.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6849|'Murka

Spark wrote:

Dragonclaw wrote:

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

why should we pay for the care of murders, rapists, and child molesters in jail? Get rid of them all.
You do realise that if often actually costs MORE to execute than to incarcerate someone (for life)?

Facts ftw.
It would be interesting to see some links supporting these facts. What costs are being included in this figure? Are they including the costs of appeals?

It is counter-intuitive that the actual act of execution (absent any of the surrounding legal costs) is more expensive than keeping someone alive for decades.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
PureFodder
Member
+225|6723
I seem to remember it's the 7,000 trials an appeals that every person on death row goes through before being killed as opposed to the far fewer that a typical life in prison, convict will go through.

The death penalty seems fairly pointless as it doesn't appear to have any effect on reducing crime. It sucks money and attention away from solving the problem of crime, focusing instead on the symptoms of it.
Funky_Finny
Banned
+456|6570|Carnoustie, Scotland

Cougar wrote:

toutinette wrote:

VS OR AGAINST?
REALLY

If no death penalty, when people come out, they go rampage but if there is death penalty, it woud be carnage!
discuss:
i THINK IT WUD BE GOODER IF THEY JUST SENT EVRYONE INTIO THE OCEANS AND MADE MAKE THEM DROWNED,, INSTEAD OF HAVEING THEM INSIDE TEH PRISONS WERE THEY JUST EAT UP THE TAXPAYERES MONEYS AND EAT THERE FOOD, lol, THEY SHOULD JUST PUT THE BAD GUYS IN THE OCEANS AND THEN LET THEM DROWND,,!!!!!!

imho
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6849|'Murka

PureFodder wrote:

I seem to remember it's the 7,000 trials an appeals that every person on death row goes through before being killed as opposed to the far fewer that a typical life in prison, convict will go through.

The death penalty seems fairly pointless as it doesn't appear to have any effect on reducing crime. It sucks money and attention away from solving the problem of crime, focusing instead on the symptoms of it.
I believe you've outlined one big reason why it isn't a deterrent...the prisoner is alive for years (if not decades) with unending appeals. Basically, they know that, even if sentenced to death, it's years and years off with a good possibility of not ever happening. At that point, there is no "death sentence", so how could it deter them?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
cheify0
Member
+2|6667|Philippines
rot in jail.....
Gawwad
My way or Haddaway!
+212|7123|Espoo, Finland

PureFodder wrote:

I seem to remember it's the 7,000 trials an appeals that every person on death row goes through before being killed as opposed to the far fewer that a typical life in prison, convict will go through.

The death penalty seems fairly pointless as it doesn't appear to have any effect on reducing crime. It sucks money and attention away from solving the problem of crime, focusing instead on the symptoms of it.
True.
The crimes that get you a death penalty are not the kind that punishment can prevent.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard