No I'm not actually, I said some, cos they did? Are you me? Do you know what effect they had on me? no.jord wrote:
...You over exaggerating or what?bennisboy wrote:
. Some bars i went in made my eyes sting due to the amount of smoke.
...no. shit is pretty harsh in smaller roomsjord wrote:
...You over exaggerating or what?bennisboy wrote:
. Some bars i went in made my eyes sting due to the amount of smoke.
Calm yourself down, I asked if you were over exaggerating. I didn't say you were, nor did I say you were lying.bennisboy wrote:
No I'm not actually, I said some, cos they did? Are you me? Do you know what effect they had on me? no.jord wrote:
...You over exaggerating or what?bennisboy wrote:
. Some bars i went in made my eyes sting due to the amount of smoke.
So kindly stop accusing me of lying
if he dosent smoke, no not really :\ ive had that happen too... which is why the smoking ban in bars has made their business pick up (in my area at least)jord wrote:
...You over exaggerating or what?bennisboy wrote:
. Some bars i went in made my eyes sting due to the amount of smoke.
I don't smoke either, I've just never really cared about people smoking near, nor have my friends. I'd rather have a meal without half my family standing outside for half the time.krazed wrote:
if he dosent smoke, no not really :\ ive had that happen too... which is why the smoking ban in bars has made their business pick up (in my area at least)jord wrote:
...You over exaggerating or what?bennisboy wrote:
. Some bars i went in made my eyes sting due to the amount of smoke.
Last edited by jord (2007-11-28 17:59:09)
And the cozy hospital bedSgt.Gene wrote:
I used to be really anti smoking when I was like 13 lol...
Im 16 now and smokin every day lol. I love the smell and taste
Ryan wrote:
Disgusting.
Mmmmm....those 403 poisons must be tasty, I do love rat poison!Sgt.Gene wrote:
I used to be really anti smoking when I was like 13 lol...
I'm 16 now and smokin every day lol. I love the smell and taste
yes... i enjoy all 403 of them.Reddhedd wrote:
Mmmmm....those 403 poisons must be tasty, I do love rat poison!Sgt.Gene wrote:
I used to be really anti smoking when I was like 13 lol...
I'm 16 now and smokin every day lol. I love the smell and taste
Read OP, then go somewhere else.Reddhedd wrote:
Mmmmm....those 403 poisons must be tasty, I do love rat poison!Sgt.Gene wrote:
I used to be really anti smoking when I was like 13 lol...
I'm 16 now and smokin every day lol. I love the smell and taste
me neither, it's not wiseMarlboroman82 wrote:
I don't smoke
They aren't treated like second class citizens, they are just asked not to smoke in public places. I personally don't want to go out to dinner with my family and have people blowing smoke at us while we are trying to enjoy our meal. Just because someone wants to smoke doesn't mean they should have the right to do it where ever they want. Just get used to the bans and restrictions, they aren't going anywhere and nor should they.Fosterthelegend wrote:
Never smoked, never plan on doing so, but I fully support smokers, I dont understand why they have to be treated like second class citizens sometimes. They are pretty much the only minority group which it seems 'ok' to discriminate against.
Secondly I hate the smoking ban, there is just so many problems with it. It also closed down one of my locals a month ago.
It should be up to the owner. Then smokers and people who don't mind can go to restaurants that allow it and people who hate smokers can go to a no smoking one. Should be totally up to the owner.d3athwi5h4 wrote:
They aren't treated like second class citizens, they are just asked not to smoke in public places. I personally don't want to go out to dinner with my family and have people blowing smoke at us while we are trying to enjoy our meal. Just because someone wants to smoke doesn't mean they should have the right to do it where ever they want. Just get used to the bans and restrictions, they aren't going anywhere and nor should they.Fosterthelegend wrote:
Never smoked, never plan on doing so, but I fully support smokers, I dont understand why they have to be treated like second class citizens sometimes. They are pretty much the only minority group which it seems 'ok' to discriminate against.
Secondly I hate the smoking ban, there is just so many problems with it. It also closed down one of my locals a month ago.
Definately. That's what gets me annoyed. If a pub/restaurant thought that banning smoking would make them more money then they would have pre-ban, and quite a few did (especially restaurants, and I can understand that). But in pubs, and especially country pubs, quite often the majority of people are smokers. Even in town pubs, if they thought banning smoking would bring in more money they would have done it ban or no ban. I don't understand why the government has to make up landlord's minds for them.jord wrote:
It should be up to the owner. Then smokers and people who don't mind can go to restaurants that allow it and people who hate smokers can go to a no smoking one. Should be totally up to the owner.d3athwi5h4 wrote:
They aren't treated like second class citizens, they are just asked not to smoke in public places. I personally don't want to go out to dinner with my family and have people blowing smoke at us while we are trying to enjoy our meal. Just because someone wants to smoke doesn't mean they should have the right to do it where ever they want. Just get used to the bans and restrictions, they aren't going anywhere and nor should they.Fosterthelegend wrote:
Never smoked, never plan on doing so, but I fully support smokers, I dont understand why they have to be treated like second class citizens sometimes. They are pretty much the only minority group which it seems 'ok' to discriminate against.
Secondly I hate the smoking ban, there is just so many problems with it. It also closed down one of my locals a month ago.
Its not just about the customers/landlord, people that are employed there shouldn't have to lose their job because the landlord doesn't mind if people smoke in their pub.Fosterthelegend wrote:
Definately. That's what gets me annoyed. If a pub/restaurant thought that banning smoking would make them more money then they would have pre-ban, and quite a few did (especially restaurants, and I can understand that). But in pubs, and especially country pubs, quite often the majority of people are smokers. Even in town pubs, if they thought banning smoking would bring in more money they would have done it ban or no ban. I don't understand why the government has to make up landlord's minds for them.
I went to a country pub for a meal last week and for half the time my family was outside. I might take up smoking then I'm not the only one sat inside anymore. Salute the landlords not giving into the ban and taking the fines.Fosterthelegend wrote:
Definately. That's what gets me annoyed. If a pub/restaurant thought that banning smoking would make them more money then they would have pre-ban, and quite a few did (especially restaurants, and I can understand that). But in pubs, and especially country pubs, quite often the majority of people are smokers. Even in town pubs, if they thought banning smoking would bring in more money they would have done it ban or no ban. I don't understand why the government has to make up landlord's minds for them.jord wrote:
It should be up to the owner. Then smokers and people who don't mind can go to restaurants that allow it and people who hate smokers can go to a no smoking one. Should be totally up to the owner.d3athwi5h4 wrote:
They aren't treated like second class citizens, they are just asked not to smoke in public places. I personally don't want to go out to dinner with my family and have people blowing smoke at us while we are trying to enjoy our meal. Just because someone wants to smoke doesn't mean they should have the right to do it where ever they want. Just get used to the bans and restrictions, they aren't going anywhere and nor should they.
1)To be fair when you applied for a job in a pub a year ago you would take into account that it is quite likely to get a bit smokeyMr.Surgeons wrote:
Its not just about the customers/landlord, people that are employed there shouldn't have to lose their job because the landlord doesn't mind if people smoke in their pub.Fosterthelegend wrote:
Definately. That's what gets me annoyed. If a pub/restaurant thought that banning smoking would make them more money then they would have pre-ban, and quite a few did (especially restaurants, and I can understand that). But in pubs, and especially country pubs, quite often the majority of people are smokers. Even in town pubs, if they thought banning smoking would bring in more money they would have done it ban or no ban. I don't understand why the government has to make up landlord's minds for them.
Last edited by Fosterthelegend (2007-11-29 09:06:56)