Dude, you're still not making any sense. I think you're backed up into a corner and trying to find a way out, and its not really working.dayarath wrote:
Allright then last sentence ;TheDarkRaven wrote:
Okay, apologies about misplacing your faith (got the impression - sorry).dayarath wrote:
Firstly you said my religion, no I'm not a christian, my whole point was along that believing there is a god is more logical than saying logic is the answer to everything (atheism)
I brought jezus to the light where I meant people probably malformed the religion.
Maybe I should it in a different context for you then let's say "if jezus ever had existed"
There is no solid proof for jezus' existance except for a few roman documents talking about "christ" which was apparently nailed to the cross, moreover I wonder who they nailed to the cross if jezus didn't exist, because surely somebody had been.
The thing you did was pick out that thing which actually totally didn't matter to the whole discussion, I got annoyed.
You've put your argument in a pretzel-knot there! To summarise and paraphrase: "The most logical thing is to say that logic isn't the answer to everything."
So... surely that is not answering itself and is thus false?
I really can't be arsed with this now; your argument contains more holes than Swiss cheese.
I don't say all of science is false, I say atheism isn't really logic to assume being truth (saying logic is the only way) <which I found ironic> because logic doesn't seem to be the answer, meaning atheism has quite a flaw there.
Maybe next time I should write down a wall of text properly to make it bullet proof :p anyway apology from my side aswell for acting a bit like a prick
Last edited by Spearhead (2007-12-03 14:02:49)